↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU234+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:21 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 39.80s 40.06s
% Output   : Refutation 39.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : SEU234+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.10  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 20:11:48 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 39.80/40.06  
% 39.80/40.06  SPASS V 3.9 
% 39.80/40.06  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 39.80/40.06  % SZS status Theorem
% 39.80/40.06  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 39.80/40.06  SPASS derived 26911 clauses, backtracked 1712 clauses, performed 37 splits and kept 13963 clauses.
% 39.80/40.06  SPASS allocated 125915 KBytes.
% 39.80/40.06  SPASS spent	0:0:39.02 on the problem.
% 39.80/40.06  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 39.80/40.06  		0:00:05.71 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 39.80/40.06  		0:00:00.50 for inferences.
% 39.80/40.06  		0:00:00.46 for the backtracking.
% 39.80/40.06  		0:0:31.84 for the reduction.
% 39.80/40.06  
% 39.80/40.06  
% 39.80/40.06  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 33 :
% 39.80/40.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% 39.80/40.06  45[0:Inp] || ordinal(skc13)* -> .
% 39.80/40.06  53[0:Inp] ||  -> subset(u,u)*.
% 39.80/40.06  95[0:Inp] || in(u,skc13)* -> ordinal(u).
% 39.80/40.06  97[0:Inp] ||  -> epsilon_transitive(u) in(skf112(u),u)*.
% 39.80/40.06  98[0:Inp] || in(skf120(u),skf121(u))* -> .
% 39.80/40.06  99[0:Inp] ||  -> epsilon_connected(u) in(skf121(u),u)*.
% 39.80/40.06  100[0:Inp] ||  -> epsilon_connected(u) in(skf120(u),u)*.
% 39.80/40.06  111[0:Inp] || in(u,skc13)* -> subset(u,skc13).
% 39.80/40.06  119[0:Inp] || subset(skf112(u),u)*l -> epsilon_transitive(u).
% 39.80/40.06  137[0:Inp] || in(skf121(u),skf120(u))* -> epsilon_connected(u).
% 39.80/40.06  138[0:Inp] || equal(skf121(u),skf120(u))** -> epsilon_connected(u).
% 39.80/40.06  140[0:Inp] epsilon_connected(u) epsilon_transitive(u) ||  -> ordinal(u)*.
% 39.80/40.06  249[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)* subset(v,w)* -> subset(u,w)*.
% 39.80/40.06  346[0:Inp] ordinal(u) ordinal(v) ||  -> in(u,v)* equal(v,u) in(v,u)*.
% 39.80/40.06  567[0:Res:140.2,45.0] epsilon_connected(skc13) epsilon_transitive(skc13) ||  -> .
% 39.80/40.06  642[0:Res:100.1,95.0] ||  -> epsilon_connected(skc13) ordinal(skf120(skc13))*.
% 39.80/40.06  643[0:Res:99.1,95.0] ||  -> epsilon_connected(skc13) ordinal(skf121(skc13))*.
% 39.80/40.06  644[1:Spt:643.0] ||  -> epsilon_connected(skc13)*.
% 39.80/40.06  645[1:MRR:567.0,644.0] epsilon_transitive(skc13) ||  -> .
% 39.80/40.06  2934[0:Res:97.1,111.0] ||  -> epsilon_transitive(skc13) subset(skf112(skc13),skc13)*l.
% 39.80/40.06  2954[1:MRR:2934.0,645.0] ||  -> subset(skf112(skc13),skc13)*l.
% 39.80/40.06  2972[1:NCh:249.2,249.0,119.0,2954.0] || subset(skc13,skc13) -> epsilon_transitive(skc13)*.
% 39.80/40.06  2977[1:MRR:2972.0,2972.1,53.0,645.0] ||  -> .
% 39.80/40.06  2978[1:Spt:2977.0,643.0,644.0] || epsilon_connected(skc13)* -> .
% 39.80/40.06  2979[1:Spt:2977.0,643.1] ||  -> ordinal(skf121(skc13))*.
% 39.80/40.06  2980[1:MRR:642.0,2978.0] ||  -> ordinal(skf120(skc13))*.
% 39.80/40.06  2984[0:MRR:2934.1,119.0] ||  -> epsilon_transitive(skc13)*.
% 39.80/40.06  2985[0:MRR:567.1,2984.0] epsilon_connected(skc13) ||  -> .
% 39.80/40.06  9316[0:Res:346.4,137.0] ordinal(skf120(u)) ordinal(skf121(u)) ||  -> in(skf120(u),skf121(u))* equal(skf121(u),skf120(u)) epsilon_connected(u).
% 39.80/40.06  9344[0:MRR:9316.2,9316.3,98.0,138.0] ordinal(skf120(u)) ordinal(skf121(u)) ||  -> epsilon_connected(u)*.
% 39.80/40.06  32917[1:SoR:9344.0,2980.0] ordinal(skf121(skc13)) ||  -> epsilon_connected(skc13)*.
% 39.80/40.06  32950[1:SSi:32917.0,2979.0] ||  -> epsilon_connected(skc13)*.
% 39.80/40.06  32951[1:MRR:32950.0,2985.0] ||  -> .
% 39.80/40.06  % SZS output end Refutation
% 39.80/40.06  Formulae used in the proof : t31_ordinal1 reflexivity_r1_tarski d2_ordinal1 d3_ordinal1 rc2_ordinal1 t7_boole d4_ordinal1 t1_xboole_1 t24_ordinal1
% 39.80/40.06  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------