↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU239+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:11:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.24s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  107 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  119 (  49   ~;  53   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(l1_wellord1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ( reflexive(X1)
      <=> ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,relation_field(X1))
           => in(ordered_pair(X2,X2),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l1_wellord1) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(d1_relat_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
        <=> ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,X2)
             => in(ordered_pair(X3,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_relat_2) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(d9_relat_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ( reflexive(X1)
      <=> is_reflexive_in(X1,relation_field(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_relat_2) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( relation(X1)
       => ( reflexive(X1)
        <=> ! [X2] :
              ( in(X2,relation_field(X1))
             => in(ordered_pair(X2,X2),X1) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l1_wellord1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X74] :
      ( relation(esk3_0)
      & ( in(esk4_0,relation_field(esk3_0))
        | ~ reflexive(esk3_0) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk4_0),esk3_0)
        | ~ reflexive(esk3_0) )
      & ( reflexive(esk3_0)
        | ~ in(X74,relation_field(esk3_0))
        | in(ordered_pair(X74,X74),esk3_0) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X59,X60] : ordered_pair(X59,X60) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X59,X60),singleton(X59)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X54,X55,X56,X57] :
      ( ( ~ is_reflexive_in(X54,X55)
        | ~ in(X56,X55)
        | in(ordered_pair(X56,X56),X54)
        | ~ relation(X54) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X54,X57),X57)
        | is_reflexive_in(X54,X57)
        | ~ relation(X54) )
      & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_2(X54,X57),esk1_2(X54,X57)),X54)
        | is_reflexive_in(X54,X57)
        | ~ relation(X54) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_relat_2])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( reflexive(esk3_0)
    | in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),esk3_0)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_field(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X50,X51] : unordered_pair(X50,X51) = unordered_pair(X51,X50),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X3,X3),X1)
    | ~ is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( reflexive(esk3_0)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),singleton(X1)),esk3_0)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_field(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk4_0,esk4_0),esk3_0)
    | ~ reflexive(esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X3),singleton(X3)),X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2)
    | ~ is_reflexive_in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X62] :
      ( ( ~ reflexive(X62)
        | is_reflexive_in(X62,relation_field(X62))
        | ~ relation(X62) )
      & ( ~ is_reflexive_in(X62,relation_field(X62))
        | reflexive(X62)
        | ~ relation(X62) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d9_relat_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk1_2(X1,X2))),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( reflexive(esk3_0)
    | in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),esk3_0)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_field(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( is_reflexive_in(esk3_0,X1)
    | in(esk1_2(esk3_0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ reflexive(esk3_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk4_0),singleton(esk4_0)),esk3_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),X2)
    | ~ is_reflexive_in(X2,X3)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( is_reflexive_in(X1,relation_field(X1))
    | ~ reflexive(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( is_reflexive_in(X1,X2)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk1_2(X1,X2)),unordered_pair(esk1_2(X1,X2),esk1_2(X1,X2))),X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( reflexive(esk3_0)
    | is_reflexive_in(esk3_0,relation_field(esk3_0))
    | in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk1_2(esk3_0,relation_field(esk3_0))),unordered_pair(esk1_2(esk3_0,relation_field(esk3_0)),esk1_2(esk3_0,relation_field(esk3_0)))),esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ reflexive(esk3_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk4_0),unordered_pair(esk4_0,esk4_0)),esk3_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),X2)
    | ~ reflexive(X2)
    | ~ relation(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_field(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk4_0,relation_field(esk3_0))
    | ~ reflexive(esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( reflexive(esk3_0)
    | is_reflexive_in(esk3_0,relation_field(esk3_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ reflexive(esk3_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_17])]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( reflexive(X1)
    | ~ is_reflexive_in(X1,relation_field(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    is_reflexive_in(esk3_0,relation_field(esk3_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_17])]),c_0_33]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SEU239+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:51:36 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.24/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.24/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.24/1.71  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------