↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU239+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:38:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.62s 2.62s
% Output   : Refutation 4.62s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   27
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  21 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  127 (  16 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  320 (  22   ~;   2   |;  27   &; 227   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  38  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  16 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   87 (   0   ^;  75   !;  12   ?;  87   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_decl,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

thf(reflexive_decl,type,
    reflexive: $i > $o ).

thf(in_decl,type,
    in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(relation_field_decl,type,
    relation_field: $i > $i ).

thf(ordered_pair_decl,type,
    ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(empty_decl,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

thf(set_union2_decl,type,
    set_union2: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(empty_set_decl,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

thf(unordered_pair_decl,type,
    unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(function_decl,type,
    function: $i > $o ).

thf(element_decl,type,
    element: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(one_to_one_decl,type,
    one_to_one: $i > $o ).

thf(relation_dom_decl,type,
    relation_dom: $i > $i ).

thf(relation_rng_decl,type,
    relation_rng: $i > $i ).

thf(singleton_decl,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

thf(is_reflexive_in_decl,type,
    is_reflexive_in: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( empty_set @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_boole) ).

thf(56,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( empty_set @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( B @ empty )
        & ( A != B )
        & ( A @ empty ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( B @ empty )
        & ( A != B )
        & ( A @ empty ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

thf(53,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ empty )
     => ~ ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) @ empty ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(64,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ empty )
     => ~ ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) @ empty ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(27,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ function )
      & ( A @ empty )
      & ( A @ relation ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_funct_1) ).

thf(113,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ function )
      & ( A @ empty )
      & ( A @ relation ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(21,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( B @ empty )
        & ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).

thf(91,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( ( B @ empty )
        & ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(24,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).

thf(99,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ empty )
     => ( A @ function ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_funct_1) ).

thf(62,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ empty )
     => ( A @ function ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ relation )
     => ( ( A @ relation_field )
        = ( A @ relation_rng @ ( A @ relation_dom @ set_union2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d6_relat_1) ).

thf(83,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ relation )
     => ( ( A @ relation_field )
        = ( A @ relation_rng @ ( A @ relation_dom @ set_union2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ set_union2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

thf(69,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ set_union2 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(25,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ relation )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( B @ ( A @ is_reflexive_in ) )
        <=> ! [C: $i] :
              ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
             => ( A @ ( C @ ( C @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_relat_2) ).

thf(101,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ relation )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
               => ( A @ ( C @ ( C @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
           => ( B @ ( A @ is_reflexive_in ) ) )
          & ( ( B @ ( A @ is_reflexive_in ) )
           => ! [C: $i] :
                ( ( B @ ( C @ in ) )
               => ( A @ ( C @ ( C @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ relation )
     => ( ( A @ reflexive )
      <=> ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( A @ relation_field @ ( B @ in ) )
           => ( A @ ( B @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l1_wellord1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ relation )
       => ( ( A @ reflexive )
        <=> ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( A @ relation_field @ ( B @ in ) )
             => ( A @ ( B @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ relation )
       => ( ( ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( A @ relation_field @ ( B @ in ) )
               => ( A @ ( B @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
           => ( A @ reflexive ) )
          & ( ( A @ reflexive )
           => ! [B: $i] :
                ( ( A @ relation_field @ ( B @ in ) )
               => ( A @ ( B @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(26,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ relation )
     => ( ( A @ reflexive )
      <=> ( A @ relation_field @ ( A @ is_reflexive_in ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_relat_2) ).

thf(109,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ relation )
     => ( ( ( A @ relation_field @ ( A @ is_reflexive_in ) )
         => ( A @ reflexive ) )
        & ( ( A @ reflexive )
         => ( A @ relation_field @ ( A @ is_reflexive_in ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ element ) )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
        | ( B @ empty ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).

thf(77,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ element ) )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
        | ( B @ empty ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(23,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
      = ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

thf(96,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
      = ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
      = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k2_xboole_0) ).

thf(59,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( A @ set_union2 ) )
      = A ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(28,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_zfmisc_1) ).

thf(118,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    empty_set @ empty,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).

thf(49,plain,
    empty_set @ empty,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(20,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ function )
        & ( A @ empty )
        & ( A @ relation ) )
     => ( ( A @ one_to_one )
        & ( A @ function )
        & ( A @ relation ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc2_funct_1) ).

thf(86,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ function )
        & ( A @ empty )
        & ( A @ relation ) )
     => ( ( A @ one_to_one )
        & ( A @ function )
        & ( A @ relation ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ empty )
     => ( A = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ empty )
     => ( A = empty_set ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).

thf(67,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ one_to_one )
      & ( A @ function )
      & ( A @ relation ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc3_funct_1) ).

thf(72,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ one_to_one )
      & ( A @ function )
      & ( A @ relation ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ empty )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ set_union2 ) @ empty ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc3_xboole_0) ).

thf(43,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ~ ( A @ empty )
     => ~ ( A @ ( B @ set_union2 ) @ empty ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ function )
      & ( A @ relation ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_funct_1) ).

thf(79,plain,
    ? [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ function )
      & ( A @ relation ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(22,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ element ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_subset) ).

thf(94,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ element ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(121,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,37,53,41,64,113,91,99,62,83,69,101,46,29,109,77,96,59,118,49,86,50,67,72,43,79,94]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU239+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/0.41  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:57:14 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.90/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.44/1.20  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (197ms). 
% 1.44/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.18/1.61  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.18/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.37/1.72  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 35 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.37/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 26 axioms (removed 9 axioms). 
% 2.57/1.84  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.57/1.85  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.57/1.85  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.62/2.61  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.62/2.61  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.62/2.61  % Time passed: 2055ms (effective reasoning time: 1387ms)
% 4.62/2.61  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.62/2.61  % Axioms used in derivation (26): fc1_zfmisc_1, t1_boole, rc3_funct_1, t6_boole, fc3_xboole_0, rc2_funct_1, t2_subset, idempotence_k2_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, fc1_xboole_0, d5_tarski, t1_subset, rc1_funct_1, fc2_xboole_0, d9_relat_2, commutativity_k2_xboole_0, t7_boole, cc1_funct_1, cc2_funct_1, existence_m1_subset_1, commutativity_k2_tarski, d1_relat_2, d6_relat_1, t8_boole, rc1_xboole_0
% 4.62/2.61  % No. of inferences in proof: 56
% 4.62/2.62  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2055 ms resp. 1387 ms w/o parsing
% 4.62/2.69  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.62/2.69  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------