↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU239+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  127 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  137 (  52   ~;  59   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   0 sgn  26   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_relat_2,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ! [B] :
          ( is_reflexive_in(A,B)
        <=> ! [C] :
              ( in(C,B)
             => in(ordered_pair(C,C),A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d1_relat_2) ).

fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(d9_relat_2,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ( reflexive(A)
      <=> is_reflexive_in(A,relation_field(A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d9_relat_2) ).

fof(l1_wellord1,conjecture,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ( reflexive(A)
      <=> ! [B] :
            ( in(B,relation_field(A))
           => in(ordered_pair(B,B),A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l1_wellord1) ).

fof(l1_wellord1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( relation(A)
       => ( reflexive(A)
        <=> ! [B] :
              ( in(B,relation_field(A))
             => in(ordered_pair(B,B),A) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[l1_wellord1]) ).

fof(nnf_35,plain,
    ? [A] :
      ( ( ? [B] :
            ( ~ in(ordered_pair(B,B),A)
            & in(B,relation_field(A)) )
        | ~ reflexive(A) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( in(ordered_pair(X0,X0),A)
            | ~ in(X0,relation_field(A)) )
        | reflexive(A) )
      & relation(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l1_wellord1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_l1_wellord1_neg_sk,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(sK2,sK2),sK0)
        & in(sK2,relation_field(sK0)) )
      | ~ reflexive(sK0) )
    & ( ! [X0] :
          ( in(ordered_pair(X0,X0),sK0)
          | ~ in(X0,relation_field(sK0)) )
      | reflexive(sK0) )
    & relation(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK2)],[nnf_35]) ).

fof(sk_l1_wellord1_neg,plain,
    ( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(sK2,sK2),sK0)
      | ~ reflexive(sK0) )
    & ( in(sK2,relation_field(sK0))
      | ~ reflexive(sK0) )
    & ! [VAR_0] :
        ( in(ordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_0),sK0)
        | ~ in(VAR_0,relation_field(sK0))
        | reflexive(sK0) )
    & relation(sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_l1_wellord1_neg_sk]) ).

cnf(c_41,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l1_wellord1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    ( ~ is_reflexive_in(A,relation_field(A))
    | reflexive(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d9_relat_2]) ).

cnf(c_47,plain,
    ( is_reflexive_in(A,relation_field(A))
    | ~ reflexive(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d9_relat_2]) ).

fof(nnf_6,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ! [B] :
          ( ( ? [C] :
                ( ~ in(ordered_pair(C,C),A)
                & in(C,B) )
            | is_reflexive_in(A,B) )
          & ( ! [X0] :
                ( in(ordered_pair(X0,X0),A)
                | ~ in(X0,B) )
            | ~ is_reflexive_in(A,B) ) )
      | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_relat_2]) ).

fof(sk_d1_relat_2_sk,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ! [B] :
          ( ( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(sK1(A,B),sK1(A,B)),A)
              & in(sK1(A,B),B) )
            | is_reflexive_in(A,B) )
          & ( ! [X0] :
                ( in(ordered_pair(X0,X0),A)
                | ~ in(X0,B) )
            | ~ is_reflexive_in(A,B) ) )
      | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(C,sK1(A,B))],[nnf_6]) ).

fof(sk_d1_relat_2,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ in(ordered_pair(sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1),sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1)),VAR_0)
        | is_reflexive_in(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ relation(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( in(sK1(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | is_reflexive_in(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ relation(VAR_0) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( in(ordered_pair(VAR_2,VAR_2),VAR_0)
        | ~ in(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ is_reflexive_in(VAR_0,VAR_1)
        | ~ relation(VAR_0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_d1_relat_2_sk]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(sK1(A,B),sK1(A,B)),A)
    | is_reflexive_in(A,B)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d1_relat_2]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    ( in(sK1(A,B),B)
    | is_reflexive_in(A,B)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d1_relat_2]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair(C,C),A)
    | ~ in(C,B)
    | ~ is_reflexive_in(A,B)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_d1_relat_2]) ).

cnf(c_56,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(B,B),sK0)
    | ~ in(B,A)
    | ~ is_reflexive_in(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK1(sK0,A),A)
    | is_reflexive_in(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(sK1(sK0,A),sK1(sK0,A)),sK0)
    | is_reflexive_in(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
    ( is_reflexive_in(sK0,relation_field(sK0))
    | ~ reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_47,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_80,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ is_reflexive_in(sK0,relation_field(sK0))
    | reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_41]) ).

cnf(c_87,plain,
    ordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,B),singleton(A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_101,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(A,A),sK0)
    | ~ in(A,relation_field(sK0))
    | reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l1_wellord1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_102,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,A),singleton(A)),sK0)
    | ~ in(A,relation_field(sK0))
    | reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_101]) ).

cnf(c_103,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(sK2,relation_field(sK0))
    | ~ reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l1_wellord1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(ordered_pair(sK2,sK2),sK0)
    | ~ reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_l1_wellord1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_105,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK2,sK2),singleton(sK2)),sK0)
    | ~ reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_104]) ).

cnf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK1(sK0,A),sK1(sK0,A)),singleton(sK1(sK0,A))),sK0)
    | is_reflexive_in(sK0,A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_114,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(B,B),singleton(B)),sK0)
    | ~ in(B,A)
    | ~ is_reflexive_in(sK0,A) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    ( in(sK1(sK0,relation_field(sK0)),relation_field(sK0))
    | reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_60]) ).

cnf(c_398,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK1(sK0,relation_field(sK0)),sK1(sK0,relation_field(sK0))),singleton(sK1(sK0,relation_field(sK0)))),sK0)
    | reflexive(sK0)
    | reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_102]) ).

cnf(c_152,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK1(sK0,relation_field(sK0)),sK1(sK0,relation_field(sK0))),singleton(sK1(sK0,relation_field(sK0)))),sK0)
    | reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_398]) ).

cnf(c_347,plain,
    ( is_reflexive_in(sK0,relation_field(sK0))
    | reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_152,c_110]) ).

cnf(c_399,negated_conjecture,
    ( reflexive(sK0)
    | reflexive(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_347,c_80]) ).

cnf(c_366,negated_conjecture,
    reflexive(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_399]) ).

cnf(c_367,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK2,sK2),singleton(sK2)),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_366,c_105]) ).

cnf(c_368,negated_conjecture,
    in(sK2,relation_field(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_366,c_103]) ).

cnf(c_369,negated_conjecture,
    is_reflexive_in(sK0,relation_field(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_366,c_76]) ).

cnf(c_389,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(A,A),singleton(A)),sK0)
    | ~ in(A,relation_field(sK0)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_369,c_114]) ).

cnf(c_400,negated_conjecture,
    in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK2,sK2),singleton(sK2)),sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_389,c_368]) ).

cnf(c_397,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_367,c_400]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SEU239+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.30  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:56:49 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.31  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.03/0.31  % Process 204175 was started by sandbox on n012,
% 0.03/0.31  % Sat Sep 26 08:56:49 2026
% 0.03/0.31  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.03/0.31  
% 0.03/0.31  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.36  
% 0.09/0.36  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.36  
% 0.09/0.36  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.09/0.36  % Length of proof is 32.
% 0.09/0.36  % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.09/0.36  % Maximum clause weight is 19.000.
% 0.09/0.36  % Given clauses 151.
% 0.09/0.36  
% 0.09/0.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------