↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU241+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:20:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.58s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (   6 unt;  20 nHn;  31 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   78 (  20 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ antisymmetric(X)
    | is_antisymmetric_in(X,relation_field(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d12_relat_2) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | antisymmetric(X)
    | ~ is_antisymmetric_in(X,relation_field(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d12_relat_2) ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ is_antisymmetric_in(X,Y)
    | ~ in(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(U,Y)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Z,U),X)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(U,Z),X)
    | Z = U ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_2) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_antisymmetric_in(X,Y)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_2) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_antisymmetric_in(X,Y)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(Y,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_2) ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_antisymmetric_in(X,Y)
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(Y,X) != 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_2) ).

cnf(17,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV4'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3_wellord1) ).

cnf(18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ antisymmetric('SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV5','SKOLEMAAAV6'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3_wellord1) ).

cnf(19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ antisymmetric('SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV6','SKOLEMAAAV5'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3_wellord1) ).

cnf(20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ antisymmetric('SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV5' != 'SKOLEMAAAV6' ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3_wellord1) ).

cnf(21,negated_conjecture,
    ( antisymmetric('SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X,Y),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3_wellord1) ).

cnf(31,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Y,Z),X)
    | in(Y,relation_field(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t30_relat_1) ).

cnf(32,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Y,Z),X)
    | in(Z,relation_field(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t30_relat_1) ).

cnf(61,plain,
    ( is_antisymmetric_in('SKOLEMAAAV4',X)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV4')),'SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,17]) ).

cnf(65,plain,
    ( is_antisymmetric_in('SKOLEMAAAV4',X)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X,'SKOLEMAAAV4')),'SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[8,17]) ).

cnf(105,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4')),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | antisymmetric('SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,61,17]) ).

cnf(108,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4')),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | antisymmetric('SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,65,17]) ).

cnf(126,plain,
    ( antisymmetric('SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[21,108,105]) ).

cnf(128,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | is_antisymmetric_in('SKOLEMAAAV4',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,126,17]) ).

cnf(129,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV6','SKOLEMAAAV5'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,126]) ).

cnf(130,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV5','SKOLEMAAAV6'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[18,126]) ).

cnf(135,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV5',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[32,129,17]) ).

cnf(136,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV6',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[31,129,17]) ).

cnf(140,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4')
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV5' = 'SKOLEMAAAV6' ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,136,17,128,135,129,130]) ).

cnf(142,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV5' = 'SKOLEMAAAV6'
    | is_antisymmetric_in('SKOLEMAAAV4',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,140,17]) ).

cnf(145,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV5' = 'SKOLEMAAAV6'
    | antisymmetric('SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,142,17]) ).

cnf(146,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV5' = 'SKOLEMAAAV6'
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV6','SKOLEMAAAV5'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[19,145]) ).

cnf(147,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV5' = 'SKOLEMAAAV6'
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV5','SKOLEMAAAV6'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[18,145]) ).

cnf(148,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV5' = 'SKOLEMAAAV6'
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV5',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[32,146,17]) ).

cnf(149,plain,
    ( 'SKOLEMAAAV5' = 'SKOLEMAAAV6'
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV6',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[31,146,17]) ).

cnf(153,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV5' = 'SKOLEMAAAV6',
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4,149,17,142,148,146,147]) ).

cnf(155,plain,
    ~ antisymmetric('SKOLEMAAAV4'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[20,153,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(164,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4') = 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4'),'SKOLEMAAAV4'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[126,155]) ).

cnf(167,plain,
    ~ is_antisymmetric_in('SKOLEMAAAV4',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAV4')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,155,17]) ).

cnf(168,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,167,17]),164,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU241+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 22:52:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  "."
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T22:52:59
% 0.19/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n007.cluster.edu at 2022-06-19T22:52:59
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|set_union2| ?X ?Y) (|set_union2| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|set_union2| ?X |empty_set|) ?X).
% 0.19/0.48  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 0.19/0.48  WARNING:
% 0.19/0.48     |one_to_one| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.19/0.48  WARNING:
% 0.19/0.48     |function| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.19/0.58  ; Declaring set_union2 to be commutative.
% 0.19/0.58  
% 0.19/0.58  #||
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.58  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.59  ||#
% 0.19/0.59  
% 0.19/0.59  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.59  ;       628 formulas have been input or derived (from 131 formulas).
% 0.19/0.59  ;       168 (27%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.19/0.59  ;           45 (27%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.59  ;          123 (73%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.59  ; 
% 0.19/0.59  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.006   5%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.002   2%   Assert                       (37 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.021  18%   Process new row              (411 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.041  35%   Resolution                   (260 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.002   2%   Paramodulation               (130 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (50 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.003   3%   Condensing                   (192 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.007   6%   Forward subsumption          (192 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (93 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (183 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.008   7%   Forward simplification       (385 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.002   2%   Backward simplification      (168 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (309 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.001   1%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.025  21%   Other
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.118        Total
% 0.19/0.59  ;     0.122        Real time
% 0.19/0.59  ; 
% 0.19/0.59  ; Term-hash-array has 273 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 56 entries (87 at peak, 93 added, 37 deleted).
% 0.19/0.59  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 216 nodes (399 at peak, 447 added, 231 deleted).
% 0.19/0.59  ;  Retrieved 194 possibly forward subsuming rows in 192 calls.
% 0.19/0.59  ;  Retrieved 18 possibly backward subsumed rows in 93 calls.
% 0.19/0.59  ; Path-index has 255 entries (273 at peak, 298 added, 43 deleted).
% 0.19/0.59  ; Path-index has 823 nodes (850 at peak, 890 added, 67 deleted).
% 0.19/0.59  ; Trie-index has 255 entries (273 at peak, 298 added, 43 deleted).
% 0.19/0.59  ; Trie-index has 1,116 nodes (1,186 at peak, 1,272 added, 156 deleted).
% 0.19/0.59  ; Retrieved 241 generalization terms in 610 calls.
% 0.19/0.59  ; Retrieved 76 instance terms in 74 calls.
% 0.19/0.59  ; Retrieved 19,657 unifiable terms in 5,057 calls.
% 0.19/0.59  ; 
% 0.19/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to process has 6 entries:
% 0.19/0.59  ;     6 with value 17
% 0.19/0.59  ; The agenda of rows to give has 20 entries:
% 0.19/0.59  ;     1 with value (4 12)          1 with value (4 24)           1 with value (4 31)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     1 with value (4 13)          2 with value (4 25)           2 with value (4 34)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     2 with value (4 15)          2 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 35)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     1 with value (4 17)          1 with value (4 27)           2 with value (4 36)
% 0.19/0.59  ;     1 with value (4 18)          1 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 37)
% 0.19/0.59  Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.59    0.122 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.59    0.110701 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.59    0.010789 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.59    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.59    0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.59    9,413,632 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.59  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T22:52:59
% 0.19/0.59  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.59  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------