↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU241+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SEU241+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 23:03:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  
% 0.21/0.47  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.47  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.47  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.47  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.47  SPASS derived 180 clauses, backtracked 33 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 146 clauses.
% 0.21/0.47  SPASS allocated 97877 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.47  SPASS spent	0:00:00.11 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.47  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.21/0.47  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.47  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.47  
% 0.21/0.47  
% 0.21/0.47  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 43 :
% 0.21/0.47  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.47  1[0:Inp] ||  -> relation(skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  13[0:Inp] || equal(skc10,skc9)** -> .
% 0.21/0.47  26[0:Inp] || antisymmetric(skc8) -> in(ordered_pair(skc9,skc10),skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  27[0:Inp] || antisymmetric(skc8) -> in(ordered_pair(skc10,skc9),skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  31[0:Inp] relation(u) antisymmetric(u) ||  -> is_antisymmetric_in(u,relation_field(u))*.
% 0.21/0.47  32[0:Inp] relation(u) || is_antisymmetric_in(u,relation_field(u))* -> antisymmetric(u).
% 0.21/0.47  38[0:Inp] relation(u) || in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)* -> in(v,relation_field(u)).
% 0.21/0.47  39[0:Inp] relation(u) || in(ordered_pair(v,w),u)* -> in(w,relation_field(u)).
% 0.21/0.47  40[0:Inp] relation(u) || equal(skf4(v,u),skf3(v,u))** -> is_antisymmetric_in(u,v).
% 0.21/0.47  41[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> is_antisymmetric_in(u,v) in(ordered_pair(skf4(v,u),skf3(v,u)),u)*.
% 0.21/0.47  42[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> is_antisymmetric_in(u,v) in(ordered_pair(skf3(v,u),skf4(v,u)),u)*.
% 0.21/0.47  43[0:Inp] || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc8)*+ in(ordered_pair(v,u),skc8)* -> antisymmetric(skc8) equal(v,u).
% 0.21/0.47  44[0:Inp] relation(u) || is_antisymmetric_in(u,v)* in(w,v)* in(x,v)* in(ordered_pair(w,x),u)* in(ordered_pair(x,w),u)* -> equal(x,w).
% 0.21/0.47  47[0:Res:1.0,44.0] || in(u,v)* in(w,v)* is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,v)* in(ordered_pair(u,w),skc8)* in(ordered_pair(w,u),skc8)* -> equal(w,u).
% 0.21/0.47  48[0:Res:1.0,41.0] ||  -> is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,u) in(ordered_pair(skf4(u,skc8),skf3(u,skc8)),skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  49[0:Res:1.0,42.0] ||  -> is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,u) in(ordered_pair(skf3(u,skc8),skf4(u,skc8)),skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  50[0:Res:1.0,40.0] || equal(skf4(u,skc8),skf3(u,skc8))** -> is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,u).
% 0.21/0.47  51[0:Res:1.0,38.0] || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc8)* -> in(u,relation_field(skc8)).
% 0.21/0.47  52[0:Res:1.0,39.0] || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc8)* -> in(v,relation_field(skc8)).
% 0.21/0.47  58[0:Res:1.0,32.0] || is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,relation_field(skc8))* -> antisymmetric(skc8).
% 0.21/0.47  71[0:Res:47.5,13.0] || is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,u)* in(skc10,u) in(skc9,u) in(ordered_pair(skc10,skc9),skc8)* in(ordered_pair(skc9,skc10),skc8) -> .
% 0.21/0.47  74[1:Spt:43.0,43.1,43.3] || in(ordered_pair(u,v),skc8)*+ in(ordered_pair(v,u),skc8)* -> equal(v,u).
% 0.21/0.47  75[2:Spt:27.0] || antisymmetric(skc8)* -> .
% 0.21/0.47  76[2:MRR:58.1,75.0] || is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,relation_field(skc8))* -> .
% 0.21/0.47  177[1:Res:49.1,74.0] || in(ordered_pair(skf4(u,skc8),skf3(u,skc8)),skc8)* -> is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,u) equal(skf4(u,skc8),skf3(u,skc8)).
% 0.21/0.47  180[1:MRR:177.2,50.0] || in(ordered_pair(skf4(u,skc8),skf3(u,skc8)),skc8)* -> is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,u).
% 0.21/0.47  181[1:MRR:180.0,48.1] ||  -> is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,u)*.
% 0.21/0.47  182[2:UnC:181.0,76.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.47  183[2:Spt:182.0,27.0,75.0] ||  -> antisymmetric(skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  184[2:Spt:182.0,27.1] ||  -> in(ordered_pair(skc10,skc9),skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  185[2:MRR:26.0,183.0] ||  -> in(ordered_pair(skc9,skc10),skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  189[2:Res:184.0,74.0] || in(ordered_pair(skc9,skc10),skc8)* -> equal(skc10,skc9).
% 0.21/0.47  192[2:MRR:189.1,13.0] || in(ordered_pair(skc9,skc10),skc8)* -> .
% 0.21/0.47  193[2:MRR:192.0,185.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.47  194[1:Spt:193.0,43.2] ||  -> antisymmetric(skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  196[1:MRR:26.0,194.0] ||  -> in(ordered_pair(skc9,skc10),skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  197[1:MRR:27.0,194.0] ||  -> in(ordered_pair(skc10,skc9),skc8)*.
% 0.21/0.47  198[1:MRR:71.3,71.4,197.0,196.0] || is_antisymmetric_in(skc8,u)* in(skc10,u) in(skc9,u) -> .
% 0.21/0.47  199[1:Res:196.0,51.0] ||  -> in(skc9,relation_field(skc8))*.
% 0.21/0.47  200[1:Res:196.0,52.0] ||  -> in(skc10,relation_field(skc8))*.
% 0.21/0.47  247[1:Res:31.2,198.0] relation(skc8) antisymmetric(skc8) || in(skc10,relation_field(skc8))* in(skc9,relation_field(skc8)) -> .
% 0.21/0.47  253[1:SSi:247.1,247.0,1.0,194.0,1.0,194.0] || in(skc10,relation_field(skc8))* in(skc9,relation_field(skc8)) -> .
% 0.21/0.47  254[1:MRR:253.0,253.1,200.0,199.0] ||  -> .
% 0.21/0.47  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.47  Formulae used in the proof : l3_wellord1 d4_relat_2 d12_relat_2 t30_relat_1
% 0.21/0.47  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------