↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEU247+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 08:01:13 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 100.64s 100.80s
% Output   : Proof 100.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem    : SEU247+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 05:08:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 100.64/100.80  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 100.64/100.80  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #7 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 100.64/100.80    (∀ (A B C : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80      relation C →
% 100.64/100.80        Eq (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction A C) B)
% 100.64/100.80          (relation_rng_restriction A (relation_dom_restriction C B)))
% 100.64/100.80    True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #8 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 100.64/100.80    (∀ (A B : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80      relation B → Eq (relation_restriction B A) (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction A B) A))
% 100.64/100.80    True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #9 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 100.64/100.80    (Not
% 100.64/100.80      (∀ (A B : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80        relation B → Eq (relation_restriction B A) (relation_rng_restriction A (relation_dom_restriction B A))))
% 100.64/100.80    True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #25 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq
% 100.64/100.80      (∀ (B : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80        relation B → Eq (relation_restriction B a) (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a B) a))
% 100.64/100.80      True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #26 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq (relation a → Eq (relation_restriction a a_1) (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a_1 a) a_1)) True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Or (Eq (relation a) False)
% 100.64/100.80      (Eq (Eq (relation_restriction a a_1) (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a_1 a) a_1)) True)
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #28 (by clausification #[27]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Or (Eq (relation a) False)
% 100.64/100.80      (Eq (relation_restriction a a_1) (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a_1 a) a_1))
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #33 (by clausification #[9]): Eq
% 100.64/100.80    (∀ (A B : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80      relation B → Eq (relation_restriction B A) (relation_rng_restriction A (relation_dom_restriction B A)))
% 100.64/100.80    False
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #34 (by clausification #[33]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq
% 100.64/100.80      (Not
% 100.64/100.80        (∀ (B : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80          relation B →
% 100.64/100.80            Eq (relation_restriction B (skS.0 0 a))
% 100.64/100.80              (relation_rng_restriction (skS.0 0 a) (relation_dom_restriction B (skS.0 0 a)))))
% 100.64/100.80      True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq
% 100.64/100.80      (∀ (B : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80        relation B →
% 100.64/100.80          Eq (relation_restriction B (skS.0 0 a))
% 100.64/100.80            (relation_rng_restriction (skS.0 0 a) (relation_dom_restriction B (skS.0 0 a))))
% 100.64/100.80      False
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #36 (by clausification #[35]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq
% 100.64/100.80      (Not
% 100.64/100.80        (relation (skS.0 1 a a_1) →
% 100.64/100.80          Eq (relation_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a))
% 100.64/100.80            (relation_rng_restriction (skS.0 0 a) (relation_dom_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a)))))
% 100.64/100.80      True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #37 (by clausification #[36]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq
% 100.64/100.80      (relation (skS.0 1 a a_1) →
% 100.64/100.80        Eq (relation_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a))
% 100.64/100.80          (relation_rng_restriction (skS.0 0 a) (relation_dom_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a))))
% 100.64/100.80      False
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #38 (by clausification #[37]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Eq (relation (skS.0 1 a a_1)) True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #39 (by clausification #[37]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq
% 100.64/100.80      (Eq (relation_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a))
% 100.64/100.80        (relation_rng_restriction (skS.0 0 a) (relation_dom_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a))))
% 100.64/100.80      False
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #43 (by superposition #[38, 28]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Or (Eq True False)
% 100.64/100.80      (Eq (relation_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) a_2)
% 100.64/100.80        (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a_2 (skS.0 1 a a_1)) a_2))
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #57 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq
% 100.64/100.80      (∀ (B C : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80        relation C →
% 100.64/100.80          Eq (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a C) B)
% 100.64/100.80            (relation_rng_restriction a (relation_dom_restriction C B)))
% 100.64/100.80      True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #58 (by clausification #[57]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq
% 100.64/100.80      (∀ (C : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80        relation C →
% 100.64/100.80          Eq (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a C) a_1)
% 100.64/100.80            (relation_rng_restriction a (relation_dom_restriction C a_1)))
% 100.64/100.80      True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #59 (by clausification #[58]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Eq
% 100.64/100.80      (relation a →
% 100.64/100.80        Eq (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a_1 a) a_2)
% 100.64/100.80          (relation_rng_restriction a_1 (relation_dom_restriction a a_2)))
% 100.64/100.80      True
% 100.64/100.80  Clause #60 (by clausification #[59]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 100.64/100.80    Or (Eq (relation a) False)
% 100.64/100.80      (Eq
% 100.64/100.80        (Eq (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a_1 a) a_2)
% 100.67/100.83          (relation_rng_restriction a_1 (relation_dom_restriction a a_2)))
% 100.67/100.83        True)
% 100.67/100.83  Clause #61 (by clausification #[60]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 100.67/100.83    Or (Eq (relation a) False)
% 100.67/100.83      (Eq (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a_1 a) a_2)
% 100.67/100.83        (relation_rng_restriction a_1 (relation_dom_restriction a a_2)))
% 100.67/100.83  Clause #62 (by superposition #[61, 38]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 100.67/100.83    Or
% 100.67/100.83      (Eq (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2)) a_3)
% 100.67/100.83        (relation_rng_restriction a (relation_dom_restriction (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) a_3)))
% 100.67/100.83      (Eq False True)
% 100.67/100.83  Clause #100 (by clausification #[39]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.67/100.83    Ne (relation_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a))
% 100.67/100.83      (relation_rng_restriction (skS.0 0 a) (relation_dom_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a)))
% 100.67/100.83  Clause #136 (by clausification #[43]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 100.67/100.83    Eq (relation_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) a_2)
% 100.67/100.83      (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a_2 (skS.0 1 a a_1)) a_2)
% 100.67/100.83  Clause #358 (by clausification #[62]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 100.67/100.83    Eq (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction a (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2)) a_3)
% 100.67/100.83      (relation_rng_restriction a (relation_dom_restriction (skS.0 1 a_1 a_2) a_3))
% 100.67/100.83  Clause #359 (by backward demodulation #[358, 100]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.67/100.83    Ne (relation_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a))
% 100.67/100.83      (relation_dom_restriction (relation_rng_restriction (skS.0 0 a) (skS.0 1 a a_1)) (skS.0 0 a))
% 100.67/100.83  Clause #4587 (by forward demodulation #[359, 136]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 100.67/100.83    Ne (relation_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a)) (relation_restriction (skS.0 1 a a_1) (skS.0 0 a))
% 100.67/100.83  Clause #4588 (by eliminate resolved literals #[4587]): False
% 100.67/100.83  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------