↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU247+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:38:12 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 25.31s 7.23s
% Output   : Refutation 25.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   56 (  30 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  217 (  18   ~;  10   |;   1   &; 179   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   0   ^;  41   !;   0   ?;  43   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   2  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_decl,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

thf(relation_restriction_decl,type,
    relation_restriction: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(relation_rng_restriction_decl,type,
    relation_rng_restriction: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(relation_dom_restriction_decl,type,
    relation_dom_restriction: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ! [B: $i] :
              ( ( B @ relation )
             => ( ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) )
                = ( A @ ( B @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( A @ relation )
           => ( ( sk1 @ ( A @ relation_restriction ) )
              = ( sk1 @ ( A @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( sk1 @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ relation )
     => ( ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t18_wellord1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ relation )
       => ( ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) )
          = ( A @ ( B @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( B @ relation )
       => ( ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) )
          = ( A @ ( B @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ relation_restriction ) )
     != ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( sk1 @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) )
    & ( sk2 @ relation ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[13]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ relation_restriction ) )
   != ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( sk1 @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( sk1 @ relation_rng_restriction ) )
   != ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ relation_restriction ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    sk2 @ relation,
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ relation )
     => ( ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_wellord1) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ relation )
     => ( ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) ) )
      | ~ ( B @ relation ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[40]) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( B @ relation )
      | ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[41]) ).

thf(731,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk2 @ relation )
       != ( B @ relation ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,42]) ).

thf(732,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk2 @ relation )
       != ( B @ relation ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[731]) ).

thf(733,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
      = ( A @ ( sk2 @ relation_restriction ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[732:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ relation )
     => ( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t140_relat_1) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ relation )
     => ( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) )
      | ~ ( C @ relation ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[37]) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( C @ relation )
      | ( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[38]) ).

thf(395,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk2 @ relation )
       != ( C @ relation ) )
      | ~ $true
      | ( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[15,39]) ).

thf(396,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( sk2 @ relation )
       != ( C @ relation ) )
      | ( ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
        = ( B @ ( C @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[395]) ).

thf(397,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( sk2 @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) @ relation_dom_restriction ) )
      = ( B @ ( sk2 @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[396:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( B )),bind(C,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(3808,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( sk2 @ relation_dom_restriction ) @ ( A @ relation_rng_restriction ) )
      = ( A @ ( sk2 @ relation_restriction ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[733,397]) ).

thf(4005,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ relation_restriction ) )
   != ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ relation_restriction ) ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[17,3808]) ).

thf(4006,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[4005]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU247+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/0.42  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:59:54 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.43  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.87/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.26/1.18  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (178ms). 
% 1.26/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.84/1.59  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.03/1.60  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.03/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 10 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.20/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 10 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.20/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.20/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.20/1.77  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 25.31/7.22  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 25.31/7.23  % Time passed: 6653ms (effective reasoning time: 6024ms)
% 25.31/7.23  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 25.31/7.23  % Axioms used in derivation (2): t17_wellord1, t140_relat_1
% 25.31/7.23  % No. of inferences in proof: 24
% 25.31/7.23  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 6653 ms resp. 6024 ms w/o parsing
% 25.31/7.27  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 25.31/7.27  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------