↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SEU248+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:41:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 62.73s 14.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 62.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  16   ~;   9   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   2 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(dt_k8_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)) ) ).

fof(t117_relat_1,lemma,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1),X1) ) ).

fof(t25_relat_1,lemma,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( relation(X1)
         => ( subset(X0,X1)
           => ( subset('relation$urng'(X0),'relation$urng'(X1))
              & subset('relation$udom'(X0),'relation$udom'(X1)) ) ) ) ) ).

fof(l29_wellord1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)),'relation$udom'(X1)) ) ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( relation(X1)
       => subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(X0,X1)),'relation$udom'(X1)) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[l29_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c396,plain,
    ( relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0))
    | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[dt_k8_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c555,plain,
    ( subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(X1,X0),X0)
    | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[t117_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c607,plain,
    ( subset('relation$udom'(X0),'relation$udom'(X1))
    | ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[t25_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c759,plain,
    relation(sK778),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c760,plain,
    ~ subset('relation$udom'('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK777,sK778)),'relation$udom'(sK778)),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ( ~ subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK777,sK778),sK778)
    | ~ relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK777,sK778))
    | ~ relation(sK778) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c607,c760]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    ( ~ subset('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK777,sK778),sK778)
    | ~ relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK777,sK778)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c759,d0]) ).

cnf(d2,plain,
    ( ~ relation(sK778)
    | ~ relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK777,sK778)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d1,c555]) ).

cnf(d3,plain,
    ~ relation('relation$urng$urestriction'(sK777,sK778)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c759,d2]) ).

cnf(d4,plain,
    ~ relation(sK778),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,c396]) ).

cnf(d5,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c759,d4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU248+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:58:17 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.43  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 62.73/14.53  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 62.73/14.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------