%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SEU248+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:31 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 10.29s 10.52s % Output : Refutation 10.29s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SEU248+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 18:52:09 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 10.29/10.52 % 10.29/10.52 SPASS V 3.9 % 10.29/10.52 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 10.29/10.52 % SZS status Theorem % 10.29/10.52 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 10.29/10.52 SPASS derived 322 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 787 clauses. % 10.29/10.52 SPASS allocated 121559 KBytes. % 10.29/10.52 SPASS spent 0:0:10.17 on the problem. % 10.29/10.52 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 10.29/10.52 0:00:09.87 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 10.29/10.52 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 10.29/10.52 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 10.29/10.52 0:00:00.10 for the reduction. % 10.29/10.52 % 10.29/10.52 % 10.29/10.52 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 : % 10.29/10.52 % SZS output start Refutation % 10.29/10.52 1[0:Inp] || -> relation(skc14)*. % 10.29/10.52 139[0:Inp] relation(u) || -> relation(relation_rng_restriction(v,u))*. % 10.29/10.52 148[0:Inp] || subset(relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction(skc15,skc14)),relation_dom(skc14))*l -> . % 10.29/10.52 169[0:Inp] relation(u) || -> subset(relation_rng_restriction(v,u),u)*l. % 10.29/10.52 432[0:Inp] relation(u) relation(v) || subset(v,u) -> subset(relation_dom(v),relation_dom(u))*. % 10.29/10.52 840[0:Res:1.0,169.0] || -> subset(relation_rng_restriction(u,skc14),skc14)*l. % 10.29/10.52 925[0:Res:1.0,139.0] || -> relation(relation_rng_restriction(u,skc14))*. % 10.29/10.52 1001[0:Res:432.3,148.0] relation(relation_rng_restriction(skc15,skc14)) relation(skc14) || subset(relation_rng_restriction(skc15,skc14),skc14)*l -> . % 10.29/10.52 1004[0:MRR:1001.0,1001.1,1001.2,925.0,1.0,840.0] || -> . % 10.29/10.52 % SZS output end Refutation % 10.29/10.52 Formulae used in the proof : l29_wellord1 dt_k8_relat_1 t117_relat_1 t25_relat_1 % 10.29/10.52 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------