%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEU254+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:38:13 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 33.33s 7.69s
% Output : Refutation 29.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 27
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 56 ( 21 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 132 ( 16 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 354 ( 14 ~; 2 |; 36 &; 264 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 35 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 16 ( 14 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 100 ( 0 ^; 88 !; 12 ?; 100 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_decl,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(transitive_decl,type,
transitive: $i > $o ).
thf(relation_restriction_decl,type,
relation_restriction: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(unordered_pair_decl,type,
unordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(element_decl,type,
element: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(empty_decl,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
thf(in_decl,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(empty_set_decl,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(set_intersection2_decl,type,
set_intersection2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(ordered_pair_decl,type,
ordered_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(singleton_decl,type,
singleton: $i > $i ).
thf(cartesian_product2_decl,type,
cartesian_product2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(function_decl,type,
function: $i > $o ).
thf(one_to_one_decl,type,
one_to_one: $i > $o ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).
thf(37,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
<=> ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t106_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(73,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
& ( ( D @ ( C @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
=> ( ( D @ ( B @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
| ( B @ empty ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset) ).
thf(66,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
| ( B @ empty ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).
thf(80,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ set_intersection2 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).
thf(63,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( B @ ( A @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
empty_set @ empty,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(50,plain,
empty_set @ empty,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_xboole_0) ).
thf(43,plain,
? [A: $i] : ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(24,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ relation_restriction ) )
= ( B @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d6_wellord1) ).
thf(99,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ relation_restriction ) )
= ( B @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',idempotence_k3_xboole_0) ).
thf(51,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(20,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A @ function ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_funct_1) ).
thf(83,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A @ function ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(57,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ relation )
=> ( ( B @ transitive )
=> ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) @ transitive ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_wellord1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ relation )
=> ( ( B @ transitive )
=> ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) @ transitive ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(29,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ relation )
=> ( ( B @ transitive )
=> ( A @ ( B @ relation_restriction ) @ transitive ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(22,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ relation )
=> ( ( B @ ( C @ relation_restriction ) @ ( A @ in ) )
<=> ( ( B @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t16_wellord1) ).
thf(89,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ relation )
=> ( ( ( ( B @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ relation_restriction ) @ ( A @ in ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( C @ relation_restriction ) @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ in ) )
& ( C @ ( A @ in ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
thf(28,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ function )
& ( A @ empty )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_funct_1) ).
thf(116,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ function )
& ( A @ empty )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty_set @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= empty_set ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_boole) ).
thf(60,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( empty_set @ ( A @ set_intersection2 ) )
= empty_set ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(21,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ function )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_funct_1) ).
thf(85,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ function )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(25,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ one_to_one )
& ( A @ function )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc3_funct_1) ).
thf(102,plain,
? [A: $i] :
( ( A @ one_to_one )
& ( A @ function )
& ( A @ relation ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
thf(34,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ ( B @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ element ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_subset) ).
thf(45,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ element ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',antisymmetry_r2_hidden) ).
thf(71,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ in ) )
=> ~ ( A @ ( B @ in ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).
thf(54,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ empty )
=> ( A = empty_set ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(27,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
=> ( B @ ( A @ relation_restriction ) @ relation ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_wellord1) ).
thf(113,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
=> ( B @ ( A @ relation_restriction ) @ relation ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( A != B )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_boole) ).
thf(39,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
~ ( ( B @ empty )
& ( A != B )
& ( A @ empty ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(26,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
=> ( ( A @ transitive )
<=> ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( D @ ( C @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
=> ( A @ ( D @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_wellord1) ).
thf(107,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
=> ( ( ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( D @ ( C @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
=> ( A @ ( D @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
=> ( A @ transitive ) )
& ( ( A @ transitive )
=> ! [B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( D @ ( C @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) )
=> ( A @ ( D @ ( B @ ordered_pair ) @ in ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(23,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ function )
& ( A @ empty )
& ( A @ relation ) )
=> ( ( A @ one_to_one )
& ( A @ function )
& ( A @ relation ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc2_funct_1) ).
thf(94,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ function )
& ( A @ empty )
& ( A @ relation ) )
=> ( ( A @ one_to_one )
& ( A @ function )
& ( A @ relation ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc2_xboole_0) ).
thf(47,plain,
? [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ empty ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).
thf(68,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ordered_pair ) )
= ( A @ singleton @ ( B @ ( A @ unordered_pair ) @ unordered_pair ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(6528,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[37,73,66,80,63,50,43,99,51,83,57,29,89,116,60,85,102,34,45,71,54,113,39,107,94,47,68]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU254+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.41 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:59:21 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.41 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.90/0.99 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.45/1.21 % [INFO] Parsing done (215ms).
% 1.45/1.22 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.25/1.63 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.25/1.64 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.49/1.75 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 33 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.67/1.81 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 26 axioms (removed 7 axioms).
% 2.67/1.86 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.67/1.87 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.67/1.87 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 33.33/7.69 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 33.33/7.69 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 33.33/7.69 % Time passed: 7137ms (effective reasoning time: 6459ms)
% 33.33/7.69 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 33.33/7.69 % Axioms used in derivation (26): fc1_zfmisc_1, t2_boole, rc3_funct_1, commutativity_k3_xboole_0, rc1_funct_1, t6_boole, rc2_funct_1, t106_zfmisc_1, t2_subset, rc2_xboole_0, antisymmetry_r2_hidden, idempotence_k3_xboole_0, l2_wellord1, fc1_xboole_0, d5_tarski, t1_subset, t7_boole, cc1_funct_1, cc2_funct_1, existence_m1_subset_1, commutativity_k2_tarski, dt_k2_wellord1, d6_wellord1, t16_wellord1, t8_boole, rc1_xboole_0
% 33.33/7.69 % No. of inferences in proof: 56
% 33.33/7.69 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 7137 ms resp. 6459 ms w/o parsing
% 29.79/7.75 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 29.79/7.75 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------