↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SEU255+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:43:41 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 9.03s 1.93s
% Output   : Proof 14.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SEU255+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 15:09:50 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.63  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.29/1.04  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.29/1.04  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.93/1.08  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.93/1.08  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.93/1.08  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.93/1.08  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.93/1.08  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 4.99/1.46  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 4.99/1.48  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 4.99/1.48  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.99/1.48  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.99/1.48  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 4.99/1.49  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.82/1.51  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.82/1.53  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.21/1.55  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.36/1.58  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 8.01/1.82  Prover 3: gave up
% 8.01/1.82  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 8.59/1.86  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 9.03/1.92  Prover 1: gave up
% 9.03/1.92  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 9.03/1.92  Prover 0: proved (1292ms)
% 9.03/1.93  
% 9.03/1.93  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.03/1.93  
% 9.03/1.94  Prover 5: stopped
% 9.03/1.94  Prover 6: stopped
% 9.03/1.95  Prover 2: stopped
% 9.34/1.97  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 9.34/1.97  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 9.34/1.97  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.34/1.97  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 9.34/1.97  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.34/1.97  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 9.34/1.97  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 9.34/1.99  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 9.34/2.01  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 9.34/2.01  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 9.34/2.03  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.34/2.03  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.34/2.04  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 9.34/2.04  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.34/2.05  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.34/2.10  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.34/2.10  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.34/2.11  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.34/2.11  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.34/2.14  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.34/2.15  Prover 10: gave up
% 9.34/2.15  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 9.34/2.16  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.34/2.17  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 11.22/2.27  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.22/2.29  Prover 8: gave up
% 11.22/2.29  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.39/2.56  Prover 4: Found proof (size 136)
% 13.39/2.56  Prover 4: proved (1916ms)
% 13.39/2.56  Prover 7: stopped
% 13.39/2.56  Prover 13: stopped
% 13.39/2.56  Prover 16: stopped
% 13.39/2.56  Prover 19: stopped
% 13.39/2.56  Prover 11: stopped
% 13.39/2.56  
% 13.39/2.56  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 13.39/2.56  
% 13.39/2.58  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 13.39/2.58  Assumptions after simplification:
% 13.39/2.58  ---------------------------------
% 13.39/2.58  
% 13.39/2.58    (cc2_funct_1)
% 13.75/2.61     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (one_to_one(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2:
% 13.75/2.61        any] :  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] : (relation(v0) = v2 & function(v0) =
% 13.75/2.61        v4 & empty(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 13.75/2.61    &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (relation(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2:
% 13.75/2.61        any] :  ? [v3: any] : (one_to_one(v0) = v3 & function(v0) = v2 & empty(v0)
% 13.75/2.61        = v1 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0) | v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 13.75/2.61      (function(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: any]
% 13.75/2.61      : (one_to_one(v0) = v3 & relation(v0) = v1 & empty(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |
% 13.75/2.61           ~ (v1 = 0) | v3 = 0))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (empty(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0)
% 13.75/2.61      |  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3: any] : (one_to_one(v0) = v3 &
% 13.75/2.61        relation(v0) = v1 & function(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0) | v3 =
% 13.75/2.61          0)))
% 13.75/2.61  
% 13.75/2.61    (dt_k2_wellord1)
% 13.75/2.61     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_restriction(v0, v1) =
% 13.75/2.61        v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] : (relation(v2)
% 13.75/2.61        = v4 & relation(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))
% 13.75/2.61  
% 13.75/2.61    (l3_wellord1)
% 13.75/2.62     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v2 = v1 |  ~
% 13.75/2.62      (antisymmetric(v0) = 0) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 13.75/2.62      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] : (( ~ (v4 =
% 13.75/2.62            0) & relation(v0) = v4) | (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v4 & in(v4, v0) = v5
% 13.75/2.62          & in(v3, v0) = v6 & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0))))) &  ! [v0:
% 13.75/2.62      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v2 = v1 |  ~
% 13.75/2.62      (antisymmetric(v0) = 0) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 13.75/2.62      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: int] :  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: any] : (( ~ (v4 =
% 13.75/2.62            0) & relation(v0) = v4) | (ordered_pair(v2, v1) = v5 & in(v5, v0) = v6
% 13.75/2.62          & in(v3, v0) = v4 & $i(v5) & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0))))) &  ! [v0:
% 13.75/2.62      $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (antisymmetric(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 13.75/2.62      [v2: int] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: int] :  ? [v7:
% 13.75/2.62        $i] :  ? [v8: int] : ($i(v4) & $i(v3) & ((v8 = 0 & v6 = 0 &  ~ (v4 = v3) &
% 13.75/2.62            ordered_pair(v4, v3) = v7 & ordered_pair(v3, v4) = v5 & in(v7, v0) = 0
% 13.75/2.62            & in(v5, v0) = 0 & $i(v7) & $i(v5)) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & relation(v0) =
% 13.75/2.62            v2)))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (relation(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1:
% 13.75/2.62        any] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6:
% 13.75/2.62        $i] :  ? [v7: int] : (antisymmetric(v0) = v1 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & ( ~ (v1 =
% 13.75/2.62            0) | ( ! [v8: $i] :  ! [v9: $i] :  ! [v10: $i] : (v9 = v8 |  ~
% 13.75/2.62              (ordered_pair(v9, v8) = v10) |  ~ $i(v9) |  ~ $i(v8) |  ? [v11: $i]
% 13.75/2.62              :  ? [v12: any] :  ? [v13: any] : (ordered_pair(v8, v9) = v11 &
% 13.75/2.62                in(v11, v0) = v12 & in(v10, v0) = v13 & $i(v11) & ( ~ (v13 = 0) | 
% 13.75/2.62                  ~ (v12 = 0)))) &  ! [v8: $i] :  ! [v9: $i] :  ! [v10: $i] : (v9
% 13.75/2.62              = v8 |  ~ (ordered_pair(v8, v9) = v10) |  ~ $i(v9) |  ~ $i(v8) |  ?
% 13.75/2.62              [v11: any] :  ? [v12: $i] :  ? [v13: any] : (ordered_pair(v9, v8) =
% 13.75/2.62                v12 & in(v12, v0) = v13 & in(v10, v0) = v11 & $i(v12) & ( ~ (v13 =
% 13.75/2.62                    0) |  ~ (v11 = 0)))))) & (v1 = 0 | (v7 = 0 & v5 = 0 &  ~ (v3 =
% 13.75/2.62              v2) & ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v6 & ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4 & in(v6,
% 13.75/2.62              v0) = 0 & in(v4, v0) = 0 & $i(v6) & $i(v4)))))
% 13.75/2.62  
% 13.75/2.62    (t16_wellord1)
% 13.75/2.62     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: any] : ( ~
% 13.75/2.62      (relation_restriction(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ (in(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 13.75/2.62      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8:
% 13.75/2.62        any] : (cartesian_product2(v1, v1) = v7 & relation(v2) = v5 & in(v0, v7) =
% 13.75/2.62        v8 & in(v0, v2) = v6 & $i(v7) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | (( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v6 = 0)
% 13.75/2.62              | v4 = 0) & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v8 = 0 & v6 = 0))))))
% 13.75/2.62  
% 13.75/2.62    (t25_wellord1)
% 13.75/2.62     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: int] : ( ~ (v3 = 0) &
% 13.75/2.62      antisymmetric(v2) = v3 & antisymmetric(v1) = 0 & relation_restriction(v1,
% 13.75/2.62        v0) = v2 & relation(v1) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 13.75/2.62  
% 13.75/2.62    (function-axioms)
% 13.75/2.63     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 13.75/2.63    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v0)) &
% 13.75/2.63     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 13.75/2.63      (relation_restriction(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_restriction(v3, v2) =
% 13.75/2.63        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 13.75/2.63      ~ (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v0))
% 13.75/2.63    &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 13.75/2.63      (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 13.75/2.63    :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 13.75/2.63      (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 13.75/2.63    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 13.75/2.63      (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 13.75/2.63      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 13.75/2.63    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 13.75/2.63      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 13.75/2.63      ~ (antisymmetric(v2) = v1) |  ~ (antisymmetric(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 13.75/2.63    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 13.75/2.63      (singleton(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 13.75/2.63      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (one_to_one(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 13.75/2.63      (one_to_one(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 13.75/2.63      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 13.75/2.63      (relation(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 13.75/2.63      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (function(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 13.75/2.63      (function(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 13.75/2.63      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 13.75/2.63      (empty(v2) = v0))
% 13.75/2.63  
% 13.75/2.63  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 13.75/2.63  --------------------------------------------
% 13.75/2.63  antisymmetry_r2_hidden, cc1_funct_1, commutativity_k2_tarski,
% 13.75/2.63  commutativity_k3_xboole_0, d5_tarski, d6_wellord1, dt_k1_tarski, dt_k1_xboole_0,
% 13.75/2.63  dt_k2_tarski, dt_k2_zfmisc_1, dt_k3_xboole_0, dt_k4_tarski, dt_m1_subset_1,
% 13.75/2.63  existence_m1_subset_1, fc1_xboole_0, fc1_zfmisc_1, idempotence_k3_xboole_0,
% 13.75/2.63  rc1_funct_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_funct_1, rc2_xboole_0, rc3_funct_1, t1_subset,
% 13.75/2.63  t2_boole, t2_subset, t6_boole, t7_boole, t8_boole
% 13.75/2.63  
% 13.75/2.63  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 13.75/2.63  ---------------------------------
% 13.75/2.63  
% 13.75/2.63  Begin of proof
% 13.75/2.63  | 
% 13.75/2.63  | ALPHA: (cc2_funct_1) implies:
% 13.75/2.63  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (relation(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: any] :  ?
% 13.75/2.63  |          [v2: any] :  ? [v3: any] : (one_to_one(v0) = v3 & function(v0) = v2 &
% 13.75/2.63  |            empty(v0) = v1 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0) | v3 = 0)))
% 13.75/2.63  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (one_to_one(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 13.75/2.63  |          [v2: any] :  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: any] : (relation(v0) = v2 &
% 13.75/2.63  |            function(v0) = v4 & empty(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0) | 
% 13.75/2.63  |              ~ (v2 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 13.75/2.63  | 
% 13.75/2.63  | ALPHA: (l3_wellord1) implies:
% 13.75/2.63  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (relation(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: any] :  ?
% 13.75/2.63  |          [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: int] :  ? [v6: $i] : 
% 13.75/2.63  |          ? [v7: int] : (antisymmetric(v0) = v1 & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & ( ~ (v1 =
% 13.75/2.63  |                0) | ( ! [v8: $i] :  ! [v9: $i] :  ! [v10: $i] : (v9 = v8 |  ~
% 13.75/2.63  |                  (ordered_pair(v9, v8) = v10) |  ~ $i(v9) |  ~ $i(v8) |  ?
% 13.75/2.63  |                  [v11: $i] :  ? [v12: any] :  ? [v13: any] : (ordered_pair(v8,
% 13.75/2.63  |                      v9) = v11 & in(v11, v0) = v12 & in(v10, v0) = v13 &
% 13.75/2.63  |                    $i(v11) & ( ~ (v13 = 0) |  ~ (v12 = 0)))) &  ! [v8: $i] : 
% 13.75/2.63  |                ! [v9: $i] :  ! [v10: $i] : (v9 = v8 |  ~ (ordered_pair(v8, v9)
% 13.75/2.63  |                    = v10) |  ~ $i(v9) |  ~ $i(v8) |  ? [v11: any] :  ? [v12:
% 13.75/2.63  |                    $i] :  ? [v13: any] : (ordered_pair(v9, v8) = v12 & in(v12,
% 13.75/2.63  |                      v0) = v13 & in(v10, v0) = v11 & $i(v12) & ( ~ (v13 = 0) |
% 13.75/2.63  |                       ~ (v11 = 0)))))) & (v1 = 0 | (v7 = 0 & v5 = 0 &  ~ (v3 =
% 13.75/2.63  |                  v2) & ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v6 & ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4 &
% 13.75/2.63  |                in(v6, v0) = 0 & in(v4, v0) = 0 & $i(v6) & $i(v4)))))
% 13.75/2.64  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (antisymmetric(v0) = v1) |  ~
% 13.75/2.64  |          $i(v0) |  ? [v2: int] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] :  ?
% 13.75/2.64  |          [v6: int] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: int] : ($i(v4) & $i(v3) & ((v8 = 0
% 13.75/2.64  |                & v6 = 0 &  ~ (v4 = v3) & ordered_pair(v4, v3) = v7 &
% 13.75/2.64  |                ordered_pair(v3, v4) = v5 & in(v7, v0) = 0 & in(v5, v0) = 0 &
% 13.75/2.64  |                $i(v7) & $i(v5)) | ( ~ (v2 = 0) & relation(v0) = v2))))
% 13.75/2.64  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v2 = v1 |  ~
% 13.75/2.64  |          (antisymmetric(v0) = 0) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2)
% 13.75/2.64  |          |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :  ? [v6: any]
% 13.75/2.64  |          : (( ~ (v4 = 0) & relation(v0) = v4) | (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v4 &
% 13.75/2.64  |              in(v4, v0) = v5 & in(v3, v0) = v6 & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v6 = 0) |  ~
% 13.75/2.64  |                (v5 = 0)))))
% 13.75/2.64  | 
% 13.75/2.64  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 13.75/2.64  |   (6)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 13.75/2.64  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation(v2) = v0))
% 13.75/2.64  |   (7)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 13.75/2.64  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (antisymmetric(v2) = v1) |  ~ (antisymmetric(v2) = v0))
% 13.75/2.64  |   (8)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 13.75/2.64  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0))
% 13.75/2.64  |   (9)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 13.75/2.64  |          (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0))
% 13.75/2.64  | 
% 13.75/2.64  | DELTA: instantiating (t25_wellord1) with fresh symbols all_33_0, all_33_1,
% 13.75/2.64  |        all_33_2, all_33_3 gives:
% 13.75/2.64  |   (10)   ~ (all_33_0 = 0) & antisymmetric(all_33_1) = all_33_0 &
% 13.75/2.64  |         antisymmetric(all_33_2) = 0 & relation_restriction(all_33_2, all_33_3)
% 13.75/2.64  |         = all_33_1 & relation(all_33_2) = 0 & $i(all_33_1) & $i(all_33_2) &
% 13.75/2.64  |         $i(all_33_3)
% 13.75/2.64  | 
% 13.75/2.64  | ALPHA: (10) implies:
% 13.75/2.64  |   (11)   ~ (all_33_0 = 0)
% 13.75/2.64  |   (12)  $i(all_33_3)
% 13.75/2.64  |   (13)  $i(all_33_2)
% 13.75/2.64  |   (14)  $i(all_33_1)
% 13.75/2.64  |   (15)  relation(all_33_2) = 0
% 13.75/2.64  |   (16)  relation_restriction(all_33_2, all_33_3) = all_33_1
% 13.75/2.64  |   (17)  antisymmetric(all_33_2) = 0
% 13.75/2.64  |   (18)  antisymmetric(all_33_1) = all_33_0
% 13.75/2.64  | 
% 13.75/2.64  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_33_2, simplifying with (13), (15)
% 13.75/2.64  |              gives:
% 13.75/2.64  |   (19)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int]
% 13.75/2.64  |         :  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: int] : (antisymmetric(all_33_2) = v0 & $i(v2)
% 13.75/2.64  |           & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | ( ! [v7: $i] :  ! [v8: $i] :  ! [v9: $i] :
% 13.75/2.64  |               (v8 = v7 |  ~ (ordered_pair(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ $i(v8) |  ~
% 13.75/2.64  |                 $i(v7) |  ? [v10: $i] :  ? [v11: any] :  ? [v12: any] :
% 13.75/2.64  |                 (ordered_pair(v7, v8) = v10 & in(v10, all_33_2) = v11 & in(v9,
% 13.75/2.64  |                     all_33_2) = v12 & $i(v10) & ( ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v11 =
% 13.75/2.64  |                       0)))) &  ! [v7: $i] :  ! [v8: $i] :  ! [v9: $i] : (v8 =
% 13.75/2.64  |                 v7 |  ~ (ordered_pair(v7, v8) = v9) |  ~ $i(v8) |  ~ $i(v7) | 
% 13.75/2.64  |                 ? [v10: any] :  ? [v11: $i] :  ? [v12: any] :
% 13.75/2.64  |                 (ordered_pair(v8, v7) = v11 & in(v11, all_33_2) = v12 & in(v9,
% 13.75/2.64  |                     all_33_2) = v10 & $i(v11) & ( ~ (v12 = 0) |  ~ (v10 =
% 13.75/2.64  |                       0)))))) & (v0 = 0 | (v6 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v2 = v1) &
% 13.75/2.64  |               ordered_pair(v2, v1) = v5 & ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v3 & in(v5,
% 13.75/2.64  |                 all_33_2) = 0 & in(v3, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(v5) & $i(v3))))
% 13.75/2.64  | 
% 13.75/2.64  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_33_2, simplifying with (13), (15)
% 13.75/2.64  |              gives:
% 13.75/2.64  |   (20)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] : (one_to_one(all_33_2) =
% 13.75/2.64  |           v2 & function(all_33_2) = v1 & empty(all_33_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |
% 13.75/2.64  |              ~ (v0 = 0) | v2 = 0))
% 13.75/2.64  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (dt_k2_wellord1) with all_33_2, all_33_3, all_33_1,
% 13.75/2.65  |              simplifying with (12), (13), (16) gives:
% 13.75/2.65  |   (21)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (relation(all_33_1) = v1 &
% 13.75/2.65  |           relation(all_33_2) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 13.75/2.65  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_33_1, all_33_0, simplifying with (14),
% 13.75/2.65  |              (18) gives:
% 13.75/2.65  |   (22)  all_33_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i]
% 13.75/2.65  |         :  ? [v4: int] :  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: int] : ($i(v2) & $i(v1) & ((v6
% 13.75/2.65  |               = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v2 = v1) & ordered_pair(v2, v1) = v5 &
% 13.75/2.65  |               ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v3 & in(v5, all_33_1) = 0 & in(v3,
% 13.75/2.65  |                 all_33_1) = 0 & $i(v5) & $i(v3)) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 13.75/2.65  |               relation(all_33_1) = v0)))
% 13.75/2.65  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | DELTA: instantiating (21) with fresh symbols all_45_0, all_45_1 gives:
% 13.75/2.65  |   (23)  relation(all_33_1) = all_45_0 & relation(all_33_2) = all_45_1 & ( ~
% 13.75/2.65  |           (all_45_1 = 0) | all_45_0 = 0)
% 13.75/2.65  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | ALPHA: (23) implies:
% 13.75/2.65  |   (24)  relation(all_33_2) = all_45_1
% 13.75/2.65  |   (25)  relation(all_33_1) = all_45_0
% 13.75/2.65  |   (26)   ~ (all_45_1 = 0) | all_45_0 = 0
% 13.75/2.65  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbols all_61_0, all_61_1, all_61_2
% 13.75/2.65  |        gives:
% 13.75/2.65  |   (27)  one_to_one(all_33_2) = all_61_0 & function(all_33_2) = all_61_1 &
% 13.75/2.65  |         empty(all_33_2) = all_61_2 & ( ~ (all_61_1 = 0) |  ~ (all_61_2 = 0) |
% 13.75/2.65  |           all_61_0 = 0)
% 13.75/2.65  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | ALPHA: (27) implies:
% 13.75/2.65  |   (28)  one_to_one(all_33_2) = all_61_0
% 13.75/2.65  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbols all_73_0, all_73_1, all_73_2,
% 13.75/2.65  |        all_73_3, all_73_4, all_73_5, all_73_6 gives:
% 13.75/2.65  |   (29)  antisymmetric(all_33_2) = all_73_6 & $i(all_73_4) & $i(all_73_5) & ( ~
% 13.75/2.65  |           (all_73_6 = 0) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 13.75/2.65  |               |  ~ (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 13.75/2.65  |               [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) =
% 13.75/2.65  |                 v3 & in(v3, all_33_2) = v4 & in(v2, all_33_2) = v5 & $i(v3) &
% 13.75/2.65  |                 ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 13.75/2.65  |             [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |
% 13.75/2.65  |                ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 13.75/2.65  |               (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v4 & in(v4, all_33_2) = v5 & in(v2,
% 13.75/2.65  |                   all_33_2) = v3 & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))))) &
% 13.75/2.65  |         (all_73_6 = 0 | (all_73_0 = 0 & all_73_2 = 0 &  ~ (all_73_4 =
% 13.75/2.65  |               all_73_5) & ordered_pair(all_73_4, all_73_5) = all_73_1 &
% 13.75/2.65  |             ordered_pair(all_73_5, all_73_4) = all_73_3 & in(all_73_1,
% 13.75/2.65  |               all_33_2) = 0 & in(all_73_3, all_33_2) = 0 & $i(all_73_1) &
% 13.75/2.65  |             $i(all_73_3)))
% 13.75/2.65  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | ALPHA: (29) implies:
% 13.75/2.65  |   (30)  antisymmetric(all_33_2) = all_73_6
% 13.75/2.65  |   (31)   ~ (all_73_6 = 0) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 13.75/2.65  |             v0 |  ~ (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 13.75/2.65  |             [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) =
% 13.75/2.65  |               v3 & in(v3, all_33_2) = v4 & in(v2, all_33_2) = v5 & $i(v3) & (
% 13.75/2.65  |                 ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 13.75/2.65  |           [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) | 
% 13.75/2.65  |             ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 13.75/2.65  |             (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v4 & in(v4, all_33_2) = v5 & in(v2,
% 13.75/2.65  |                 all_33_2) = v3 & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0)))))
% 13.75/2.65  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | BETA: splitting (22) gives:
% 13.75/2.65  | 
% 13.75/2.65  | Case 1:
% 13.75/2.65  | | 
% 13.75/2.65  | |   (32)  all_33_0 = 0
% 13.75/2.65  | | 
% 13.75/2.65  | | REDUCE: (11), (32) imply:
% 13.75/2.65  | |   (33)  $false
% 14.08/2.65  | | 
% 14.08/2.65  | | CLOSE: (33) is inconsistent.
% 14.08/2.65  | | 
% 14.08/2.65  | Case 2:
% 14.08/2.65  | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | |   (34)   ? [v0: int] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4:
% 14.08/2.66  | |           int] :  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: int] : ($i(v2) & $i(v1) & ((v6 = 0 &
% 14.08/2.66  | |               v4 = 0 &  ~ (v2 = v1) & ordered_pair(v2, v1) = v5 &
% 14.08/2.66  | |               ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v3 & in(v5, all_33_1) = 0 & in(v3,
% 14.08/2.66  | |                 all_33_1) = 0 & $i(v5) & $i(v3)) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 14.08/2.66  | |               relation(all_33_1) = v0)))
% 14.08/2.66  | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | DELTA: instantiating (34) with fresh symbols all_79_0, all_79_1, all_79_2,
% 14.08/2.66  | |        all_79_3, all_79_4, all_79_5, all_79_6 gives:
% 14.08/2.66  | |   (35)  $i(all_79_4) & $i(all_79_5) & ((all_79_0 = 0 & all_79_2 = 0 &  ~
% 14.08/2.66  | |             (all_79_4 = all_79_5) & ordered_pair(all_79_4, all_79_5) =
% 14.08/2.66  | |             all_79_1 & ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = all_79_3 &
% 14.08/2.66  | |             in(all_79_1, all_33_1) = 0 & in(all_79_3, all_33_1) = 0 &
% 14.08/2.66  | |             $i(all_79_1) & $i(all_79_3)) | ( ~ (all_79_6 = 0) &
% 14.08/2.66  | |             relation(all_33_1) = all_79_6))
% 14.08/2.66  | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | ALPHA: (35) implies:
% 14.08/2.66  | |   (36)  $i(all_79_5)
% 14.08/2.66  | |   (37)  $i(all_79_4)
% 14.08/2.66  | |   (38)  (all_79_0 = 0 & all_79_2 = 0 &  ~ (all_79_4 = all_79_5) &
% 14.08/2.66  | |           ordered_pair(all_79_4, all_79_5) = all_79_1 &
% 14.08/2.66  | |           ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = all_79_3 & in(all_79_1,
% 14.08/2.66  | |             all_33_1) = 0 & in(all_79_3, all_33_1) = 0 & $i(all_79_1) &
% 14.08/2.66  | |           $i(all_79_3)) | ( ~ (all_79_6 = 0) & relation(all_33_1) =
% 14.08/2.66  | |           all_79_6)
% 14.08/2.66  | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with 0, all_45_1, all_33_2, simplifying with
% 14.08/2.66  | |              (15), (24) gives:
% 14.08/2.66  | |   (39)  all_45_1 = 0
% 14.08/2.66  | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with 0, all_73_6, all_33_2, simplifying with
% 14.08/2.66  | |              (17), (30) gives:
% 14.08/2.66  | |   (40)  all_73_6 = 0
% 14.08/2.66  | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | BETA: splitting (26) gives:
% 14.08/2.66  | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | Case 1:
% 14.08/2.66  | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | |   (41)   ~ (all_45_1 = 0)
% 14.08/2.66  | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | | REDUCE: (39), (41) imply:
% 14.08/2.66  | | |   (42)  $false
% 14.08/2.66  | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | | CLOSE: (42) is inconsistent.
% 14.08/2.66  | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | Case 2:
% 14.08/2.66  | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | |   (43)  all_45_0 = 0
% 14.08/2.66  | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | | REDUCE: (25), (43) imply:
% 14.08/2.66  | | |   (44)  relation(all_33_1) = 0
% 14.08/2.66  | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | | BETA: splitting (38) gives:
% 14.08/2.66  | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | | Case 1:
% 14.08/2.66  | | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |   (45)  all_79_0 = 0 & all_79_2 = 0 &  ~ (all_79_4 = all_79_5) &
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |         ordered_pair(all_79_4, all_79_5) = all_79_1 &
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |         ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = all_79_3 & in(all_79_1,
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |           all_33_1) = 0 & in(all_79_3, all_33_1) = 0 & $i(all_79_1) &
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |         $i(all_79_3)
% 14.08/2.66  | | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | | | ALPHA: (45) implies:
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |   (46)   ~ (all_79_4 = all_79_5)
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |   (47)  $i(all_79_3)
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |   (48)  $i(all_79_1)
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |   (49)  in(all_79_3, all_33_1) = 0
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |   (50)  in(all_79_1, all_33_1) = 0
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |   (51)  ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = all_79_3
% 14.08/2.66  | | | |   (52)  ordered_pair(all_79_4, all_79_5) = all_79_1
% 14.08/2.66  | | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | | | BETA: splitting (31) gives:
% 14.08/2.66  | | | | 
% 14.08/2.66  | | | | Case 1:
% 14.08/2.66  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |   (53)   ~ (all_73_6 = 0)
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | | REDUCE: (40), (53) imply:
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |   (54)  $false
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | | CLOSE: (54) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |   (55)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |           (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |           [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] : (ordered_pair(v0,
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |               v1) = v3 & in(v3, all_33_2) = v4 & in(v2, all_33_2) = v5
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |             & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] : 
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |         ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1)
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |             = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: any] :  ? [v4: $i]
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |           :  ? [v5: any] : (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v4 & in(v4,
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |               all_33_2) = v5 & in(v2, all_33_2) = v3 & $i(v4) & ( ~
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | |               (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.66  | | | | | ALPHA: (55) implies:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (56)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           [v3: any] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: any] : (ordered_pair(v1,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |               v0) = v4 & in(v4, all_33_2) = v5 & in(v2, all_33_2) = v3
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |             & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v3 = 0))))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (57)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] : (ordered_pair(v0,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |               v1) = v3 & in(v3, all_33_2) = v4 & in(v2, all_33_2) = v5
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |             & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ~ (v4 = 0))))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t16_wellord1) with all_79_3, all_33_3,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              all_33_2, all_33_1, 0, simplifying with (12), (13), (16),
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              (47), (49) gives:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (58)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: any] :
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |         (cartesian_product2(all_33_3, all_33_3) = v2 &
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           relation(all_33_2) = v0 & in(all_79_3, v2) = v3 &
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           in(all_79_3, all_33_2) = v1 & $i(v2) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v3 =
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |               0 & v1 = 0)))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t16_wellord1) with all_79_1, all_33_3,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              all_33_2, all_33_1, 0, simplifying with (12), (13), (16),
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              (48), (50) gives:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (59)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: any] :
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |         (cartesian_product2(all_33_3, all_33_3) = v2 &
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           relation(all_33_2) = v0 & in(all_79_1, v2) = v3 &
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = v1 & $i(v2) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v3 =
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |               0 & v1 = 0)))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_33_2, all_61_0, simplifying
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              with (13), (28) gives:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (60)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] :
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |         (relation(all_33_2) = v0 & function(all_33_2) = v2 &
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           empty(all_33_2) = v1 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 =
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |               0) | all_61_0 = 0))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_33_2, all_79_4, all_79_5,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              all_79_3, simplifying with (13), (17), (36), (37), (51)
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              gives:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (61)  all_79_4 = all_79_5 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           any] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = v0) |
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           (ordered_pair(all_79_4, all_79_5) = v0 & in(v0, all_33_2) =
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |             v1 & in(all_79_3, all_33_2) = v2 & $i(v0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |                ~ (v1 = 0))))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_33_2, all_79_5, all_79_4,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              all_79_1, simplifying with (13), (17), (36), (37), (52)
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              gives:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (62)  all_79_4 = all_79_5 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           any] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = v0) |
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           (ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = v0 & in(v0, all_33_2) =
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |             v1 & in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = v2 & $i(v0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |                ~ (v1 = 0))))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (57) with all_79_5, all_79_4, all_79_1,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              simplifying with (36), (37), (52) gives:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (63)  all_79_4 = all_79_5 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           any] : (ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = v0 & in(v0,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |             all_33_2) = v1 & in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = v2 & $i(v0) & (
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |             ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0)))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (56) with all_79_4, all_79_5, all_79_1,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |              simplifying with (36), (37), (52) gives:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (64)  all_79_4 = all_79_5 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           any] : (ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = v1 & in(v1,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |             all_33_2) = v2 & in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = v0 & $i(v1) & (
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |             ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (60) with fresh symbols all_135_0, all_135_1,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |        all_135_2 gives:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (65)  relation(all_33_2) = all_135_2 & function(all_33_2) =
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |         all_135_0 & empty(all_33_2) = all_135_1 & ( ~ (all_135_0 = 0)
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |           |  ~ (all_135_1 = 0) |  ~ (all_135_2 = 0) | all_61_0 = 0)
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | ALPHA: (65) implies:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (66)  relation(all_33_2) = all_135_2
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (59) with fresh symbols all_139_0, all_139_1,
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |        all_139_2, all_139_3 gives:
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |   (67)  cartesian_product2(all_33_3, all_33_3) = all_139_1 &
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |         relation(all_33_2) = all_139_3 & in(all_79_1, all_139_1) =
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |         all_139_0 & in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = all_139_2 & $i(all_139_1)
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | |         & ( ~ (all_139_3 = 0) | (all_139_0 = 0 & all_139_2 = 0))
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.67  | | | | | ALPHA: (67) implies:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |   (68)  in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = all_139_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |   (69)  relation(all_33_2) = all_139_3
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |   (70)   ~ (all_139_3 = 0) | (all_139_0 = 0 & all_139_2 = 0)
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (58) with fresh symbols all_141_0, all_141_1,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |        all_141_2, all_141_3 gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |   (71)  cartesian_product2(all_33_3, all_33_3) = all_141_1 &
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |         relation(all_33_2) = all_141_3 & in(all_79_3, all_141_1) =
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |         all_141_0 & in(all_79_3, all_33_2) = all_141_2 & $i(all_141_1)
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |         & ( ~ (all_141_3 = 0) | (all_141_0 = 0 & all_141_2 = 0))
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | ALPHA: (71) implies:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |   (72)  in(all_79_3, all_33_2) = all_141_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |   (73)  relation(all_33_2) = all_141_3
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | |   (74)   ~ (all_141_3 = 0) | (all_141_0 = 0 & all_141_2 = 0)
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | BETA: splitting (62) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |   (75)  all_79_4 = all_79_5
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | REDUCE: (46), (75) imply:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |   (76)  $false
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | CLOSE: (76) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |   (77)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) &
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |             relation(all_33_2) = v0) | (ordered_pair(all_79_5,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |               all_79_4) = v0 & in(v0, all_33_2) = v1 & in(all_79_1,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |               all_33_2) = v2 & $i(v0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 =
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |                 0))))
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (77) with fresh symbols all_149_0, all_149_1,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |        all_149_2 gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |   (78)  ( ~ (all_149_2 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = all_149_2) |
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |         (ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = all_149_2 &
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |           in(all_149_2, all_33_2) = all_149_1 & in(all_79_1,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |             all_33_2) = all_149_0 & $i(all_149_2) & ( ~ (all_149_0 =
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | |               0) |  ~ (all_149_1 = 0)))
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (61) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |   (79)  all_79_4 = all_79_5
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (46), (79) imply:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |   (80)  $false
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (80) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |   (81)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] : (( ~ (v0 = 0)
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |             & relation(all_33_2) = v0) | (ordered_pair(all_79_4,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |               all_79_5) = v0 & in(v0, all_33_2) = v1 &
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |             in(all_79_3, all_33_2) = v2 & $i(v0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |               ~ (v1 = 0))))
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (81) with fresh symbols all_157_0, all_157_1,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |        all_157_2 gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |   (82)  ( ~ (all_157_2 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = all_157_2) |
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |         (ordered_pair(all_79_4, all_79_5) = all_157_2 &
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |           in(all_157_2, all_33_2) = all_157_1 & in(all_79_3,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |             all_33_2) = all_157_0 & $i(all_157_2) & ( ~ (all_157_0
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | |               = 0) |  ~ (all_157_1 = 0)))
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (82) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (83)   ~ (all_157_2 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) = all_157_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (83) implies:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (84)   ~ (all_157_2 = 0)
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (85)  relation(all_33_2) = all_157_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with 0, all_139_3, all_33_2,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (15), (69) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (86)  all_139_3 = 0
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_139_3, all_141_3,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              all_33_2, simplifying with (69), (73) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (87)  all_141_3 = all_139_3
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_141_3, all_157_2,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              all_33_2, simplifying with (73), (85) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (88)  all_157_2 = all_141_3
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_135_2, all_157_2,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              all_33_2, simplifying with (66), (85) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (89)  all_157_2 = all_135_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (88), (89) imply:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (90)  all_141_3 = all_135_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | SIMP: (90) implies:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (91)  all_141_3 = all_135_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (87), (91) imply:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (92)  all_139_3 = all_135_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | SIMP: (92) implies:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (93)  all_139_3 = all_135_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (86), (93) imply:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (94)  all_135_2 = 0
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (89), (94) imply:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (95)  all_157_2 = 0
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (84), (95) imply:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (96)  $false
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (96) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (97)  ordered_pair(all_79_4, all_79_5) = all_157_2 &
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |         in(all_157_2, all_33_2) = all_157_1 & in(all_79_3,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |           all_33_2) = all_157_0 & $i(all_157_2) & ( ~ (all_157_0
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |             = 0) |  ~ (all_157_1 = 0))
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (97) implies:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (98)  in(all_79_3, all_33_2) = all_157_0
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (99)  in(all_157_2, all_33_2) = all_157_1
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (100)  ordered_pair(all_79_4, all_79_5) = all_157_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (101)   ~ (all_157_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_157_1 = 0)
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_141_2, all_157_0,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              all_33_2, all_79_3, simplifying with (72), (98)
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (102)  all_157_0 = all_141_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with 0, all_139_3, all_33_2,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (15), (69) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (103)  all_139_3 = 0
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_139_3, all_141_3,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              all_33_2, simplifying with (69), (73) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (104)  all_141_3 = all_139_3
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_135_2, all_141_3,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              all_33_2, simplifying with (66), (73) gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (105)  all_141_3 = all_135_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with all_79_1, all_157_2,
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              all_79_5, all_79_4, simplifying with (52), (100)
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (106)  all_157_2 = all_79_1
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (104), (105) imply:
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | |   (107)  all_139_3 = all_135_2
% 14.12/2.68  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | SIMP: (107) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | |   (108)  all_139_3 = all_135_2
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (103), (108) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | |   (109)  all_135_2 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (105), (109) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | |   (110)  all_141_3 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (99), (106) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | |   (111)  in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = all_157_1
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (70) gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | |   (112)   ~ (all_139_3 = 0)
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (103), (112) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | |   (113)  $false
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (113) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | |   (114)  all_139_0 = 0 & all_139_2 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (114) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | |   (115)  all_139_2 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (68), (115) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | |   (116)  in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (63) gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |   (117)  all_79_4 = all_79_5
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (46), (117) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |   (118)  $false
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (118) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |   (119)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: any] :  ? [v2: any] :
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |          (ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = v0 & in(v0,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |              all_33_2) = v1 & in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = v2 &
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |            $i(v0) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v1 = 0)))
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (119) with fresh symbols all_190_0,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |        all_190_1, all_190_2 gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |   (120)  ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = all_190_2 &
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |          in(all_190_2, all_33_2) = all_190_1 & in(all_79_1,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |            all_33_2) = all_190_0 & $i(all_190_2) & ( ~
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |            (all_190_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_190_1 = 0))
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (120) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | |   (121)  in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = all_190_0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (78) gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |   (122)   ~ (all_149_2 = 0) & relation(all_33_2) =
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |          all_149_2
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (122) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |   (123)   ~ (all_149_2 = 0)
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |   (124)  relation(all_33_2) = all_149_2
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with 0, all_149_2, all_33_2,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (15), (124) gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |   (125)  all_149_2 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (123), (125) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |   (126)  $false
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (126) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |   (127)  ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = all_149_2 &
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |          in(all_149_2, all_33_2) = all_149_1 & in(all_79_1,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |            all_33_2) = all_149_0 & $i(all_149_2) & ( ~
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |            (all_149_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_149_1 = 0))
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (127) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | |   (128)  in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = all_149_0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (74) gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (129)   ~ (all_141_3 = 0)
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (110), (129) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (130)  $false
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (130) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (131)  all_141_0 = 0 & all_141_2 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (131) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (132)  all_141_2 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (102), (132) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | |   (133)  all_157_0 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (101) gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (134)   ~ (all_157_0 = 0)
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (133), (134) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (135)  $false
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (135) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (136)   ~ (all_157_1 = 0)
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (64) gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (137)  all_79_4 = all_79_5
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (46), (137) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (138)  $false
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (138) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (139)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] :
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |          (ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = v1 & in(v1,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_33_2) = v2 & in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = v0 &
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |            $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (139) with fresh symbols all_220_0,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |        all_220_1, all_220_2 gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (140)  ordered_pair(all_79_5, all_79_4) = all_220_1 &
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |          in(all_220_1, all_33_2) = all_220_0 & in(all_79_1,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |            all_33_2) = all_220_2 & $i(all_220_1) & ( ~
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |            (all_220_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_220_2 = 0))
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ALPHA: (140) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (141)  in(all_79_1, all_33_2) = all_220_2
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_149_0, all_157_1,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_33_2, all_79_1, simplifying with (111), (128)
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (142)  all_157_1 = all_149_0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_157_1, all_190_0,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_33_2, all_79_1, simplifying with (111), (121)
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (143)  all_190_0 = all_157_1
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_190_0, all_220_2,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_33_2, all_79_1, simplifying with (121), (141)
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (144)  all_220_2 = all_190_0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with 0, all_220_2, all_33_2,
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |              all_79_1, simplifying with (116), (141) gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (145)  all_220_2 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (144), (145) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (146)  all_190_0 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (146) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (147)  all_190_0 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (143), (147) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (148)  all_157_1 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SIMP: (148) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (149)  all_157_1 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (142), (149) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (150)  all_149_0 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (136), (149) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | |   (151)  $false
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (151) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | Case 2:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | |   (152)   ~ (all_79_6 = 0) & relation(all_33_1) = all_79_6
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | ALPHA: (152) implies:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | |   (153)   ~ (all_79_6 = 0)
% 14.12/2.69  | | | |   (154)  relation(all_33_1) = all_79_6
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with 0, all_79_6, all_33_1, simplifying
% 14.12/2.69  | | | |              with (44), (154) gives:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | |   (155)  all_79_6 = 0
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | REDUCE: (153), (155) imply:
% 14.12/2.69  | | | |   (156)  $false
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | CLOSE: (156) is inconsistent.
% 14.12/2.69  | | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | | 
% 14.12/2.69  | End of split
% 14.12/2.69  | 
% 14.12/2.69  End of proof
% 14.12/2.69  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 14.12/2.69  
% 14.12/2.69  2080ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------