↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU255+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:56:22 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 23.66s 16.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 23.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  174 (  22 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  205 (  84   ~;  86   |;  22   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (   0 sgn  78   !;   8   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f56,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),singleton(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(f85,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => relation(relation_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_wellord1) ).

fof(f152,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => ( antisymmetric(X0)
      <=> ! [X1,X2] :
            ( ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X1),X0)
              & in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0) )
           => X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l3_wellord1) ).

fof(f204,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
     => ( in(X0,relation_restriction(X2,X1))
      <=> ( in(X0,cartesian_product2(X1,X1))
          & in(X0,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t16_wellord1) ).

fof(f230,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ( antisymmetric(X1)
       => antisymmetric(relation_restriction(X1,X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t25_wellord1) ).

fof(f231,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( relation(X1)
       => ( antisymmetric(X1)
         => antisymmetric(relation_restriction(X1,X0)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f230]) ).

fof(f291,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(f393,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | relation(relation_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f449,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( antisymmetric(X0)
      <=> ! [X1,X2] :
            ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X1),X0)
            | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0)
            | X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f152]) ).

fof(f450,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( antisymmetric(X0)
      <=> ! [X1,X2] :
            ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X1),X0)
            | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0)
            | X1 = X2 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f449]) ).

fof(f494,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ( in(X0,relation_restriction(X2,X1))
      <=> ( in(X0,cartesian_product2(X1,X1))
          & in(X0,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f204]) ).

fof(f533,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
      & antisymmetric(X1)
      & ~ antisymmetric(relation_restriction(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f231]) ).

fof(f534,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
      & antisymmetric(X1)
      & ~ antisymmetric(relation_restriction(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f533]) ).

fof(f777,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( ( ~ antisymmetric(X0)
          | ! [X1,X2] :
              ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X1),X0)
              | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0)
              | X1 = X2 ) )
        & ( ? [X1,X2] :
              ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X1),X0)
              & in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0)
              & X1 != X2 )
          | antisymmetric(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f450]) ).

fof(f778,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( ( ~ antisymmetric(X0)
          | ! [X3,X4] :
              ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X0)
              | ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X0)
              | X3 = X4 ) )
        & ( ? [X1,X2] :
              ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X1),X0)
              & in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X0)
              & X1 != X2 )
          | antisymmetric(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f777]) ).

fof(f779,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( ( ~ antisymmetric(X0)
          | ! [X3,X4] :
              ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X0)
              | ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X0)
              | X3 = X4 ) )
        & ( ( in(ordered_pair(sK84(X0),sK83(X0)),X0)
            & in(ordered_pair(sK83(X0),sK84(X0)),X0)
            & sK83(X0) != sK84(X0) )
          | antisymmetric(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK83,sK84]),skolemize(X1,sK83(X0)),skolemize(X2,sK84(X0))],[f778]) ).

fof(f816,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ( ( ~ in(X0,relation_restriction(X2,X1))
          | ( in(X0,cartesian_product2(X1,X1))
            & in(X0,X2) ) )
        & ( ~ in(X0,cartesian_product2(X1,X1))
          | ~ in(X0,X2)
          | in(X0,relation_restriction(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f494]) ).

fof(f817,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ( ( ~ in(X0,relation_restriction(X2,X1))
          | ( in(X0,cartesian_product2(X1,X1))
            & in(X0,X2) ) )
        & ( ~ in(X0,cartesian_product2(X1,X1))
          | ~ in(X0,X2)
          | in(X0,relation_restriction(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f816]) ).

fof(f820,plain,
    ( relation(sK106)
    & antisymmetric(sK106)
    & ~ antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK105,sK106]),skolemize(X0,sK105),skolemize(X1,sK106)],[f534]) ).

fof(f1084,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),singleton(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f1137,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | relation(relation_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f393]) ).

fof(f1228,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ antisymmetric(X0)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X0)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X0)
      | X3 = X4 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f779]) ).

fof(f1229,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | in(ordered_pair(sK84(X0),sK83(X0)),X0)
      | antisymmetric(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f779]) ).

fof(f1230,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | in(ordered_pair(sK83(X0),sK84(X0)),X0)
      | antisymmetric(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f779]) ).

fof(f1231,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | sK83(X0) != sK84(X0)
      | antisymmetric(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f779]) ).

fof(f1333,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_restriction(X2,X1))
      | in(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f817]) ).

fof(f1366,plain,
    relation(sK106),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f820]) ).

fof(f1367,plain,
    antisymmetric(sK106),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f820]) ).

fof(f1368,plain,
    ~ antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f820]) ).

fof(f1476,plain,
    ! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f291]) ).

fof(f1514,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1084,f1476]) ).

fof(f1626,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK83(X0),sK84(X0)),unordered_pair(sK83(X0),sK83(X0))),X0)
      | antisymmetric(X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1230,f1514]) ).

fof(f1627,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK84(X0),sK83(X0)),unordered_pair(sK84(X0),sK84(X0))),X0)
      | antisymmetric(X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1229,f1514]) ).

fof(f1628,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ antisymmetric(X0)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X3),unordered_pair(X4,X4)),X0)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X4),unordered_pair(X3,X3)),X0)
      | X3 = X4 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1228,f1514,f1514]) ).

tcf(c_313,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( relation(relation_restriction(X0,X1))
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1137]) ).

tcf(c_404,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( antisymmetric(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ( sK83(X0) != sK84(X0) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1231]) ).

tcf(c_405,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( antisymmetric(X0)
      | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK83(X0),sK84(X0)),unordered_pair(sK83(X0),sK83(X0))),X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1626]) ).

tcf(c_406,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( antisymmetric(X0)
      | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK84(X0),sK83(X0)),unordered_pair(sK84(X0),sK84(X0))),X0)
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1627]) ).

tcf(c_407,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ antisymmetric(X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X0),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),X2)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1628]) ).

tcf(c_509,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(X0,X1)
      | ~ relation(X1)
      | ~ in(X0,relation_restriction(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1333]) ).

tcf(c_542,negated_conjecture,
    ~ antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1368]) ).

tcf(c_543,negated_conjecture,
    antisymmetric(sK106),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1367]) ).

tcf(c_544,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK106),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1366]) ).

tcf(c_12825,plain,
    ( antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))
    | ~ relation(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))
    | ( sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) != sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_404]) ).

tcf(c_12826,plain,
    ( antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))
    | ~ relation(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_405]) ).

tcf(c_12827,plain,
    ( antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))
    | ~ relation(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_406]) ).

tcf(c_13697,plain,
    ( relation(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))
    | ~ relation(sK106) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_313]) ).

tcf(c_14564,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),X2)
      | ~ relation(X2)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),relation_restriction(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_509]) ).

tcf(c_15184,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) = sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) )
      | ~ antisymmetric(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),X0)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_407]) ).

tcf(c_16335,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),sK106)
    | ~ relation(sK106)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_14564]) ).

tcf(c_16336,plain,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),sK106)
    | ~ relation(sK106)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_14564]) ).

tcf(c_16337,plain,
    ( ( sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) = sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)) )
    | ~ antisymmetric(sK106)
    | ~ relation(sK106)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),sK106)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK84(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105))),unordered_pair(sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)),sK83(relation_restriction(sK106,sK105)))),sK106) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_15184]) ).

tcf(c_16338,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_16337,c_16336,c_16335,c_13697,c_12827,c_12826,c_12825,c_542,c_543,c_544]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU255+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/10.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/10.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/10.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/10.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/10.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/10.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/10.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/10.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 13:25:23 UTC 2026
% 0.10/10.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/10.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/10.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/10.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/10.42  
% 0.13/10.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/10.42  
% 0.13/10.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/10.44  % Proving...
% 23.66/16.82  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 23.66/16.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % ------  iProver source info
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 23.66/16.82  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 23.66/16.82  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ Parsing...
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ Preprocessing...
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ Proving...
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % 
% 23.66/16.82  % clauses                               577
% 23.66/16.82  % conjectures                           3
% 23.66/16.82  % EPR                                   96
% 23.66/16.82  % Horn                                  450
% 23.66/16.82  % unary                                 87
% 23.66/16.82  % binary                                147
% 23.66/16.82  % lits                                  1674
% 23.66/16.82  % lits eq                               265
% 23.66/16.82  % fd_pure                               0
% 23.66/16.82  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 23.66/16.82  % fd_cond                               21
% 23.66/16.82  % fd_pseudo_cond                        99
% 23.66/16.82  % AC symbols                            0
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ 
% 23.66/16.82  % Current options:
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ 
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % 
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % ------ Proving...
% 23.66/16.82  % 
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 23.66/16.82  
% 23.66/16.82  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------