↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU257+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 103.46s 14.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 103.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  133 (  56   ~;  52   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (  18 sgn  17   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d4_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ( well_ordering(A)
      <=> ( well_founded_relation(A)
          & connected(A)
          & antisymmetric(A)
          & transitive(A)
          & reflexive(A) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d4_wellord1) ).

fof(dt_k2_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(A)
     => relation(relation_restriction(A,B)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_wellord1) ).

fof(t22_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => ( reflexive(B)
       => reflexive(relation_restriction(B,A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t22_wellord1) ).

fof(t23_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => ( connected(B)
       => connected(relation_restriction(B,A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t23_wellord1) ).

fof(t24_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => ( transitive(B)
       => transitive(relation_restriction(B,A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t24_wellord1) ).

fof(t25_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => ( antisymmetric(B)
       => antisymmetric(relation_restriction(B,A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t25_wellord1) ).

fof(t31_wellord1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => ( well_founded_relation(B)
       => well_founded_relation(relation_restriction(B,A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t31_wellord1) ).

fof(t32_wellord1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( relation(B)
     => ( well_ordering(B)
       => well_ordering(relation_restriction(B,A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t32_wellord1) ).

fof(t32_wellord1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( relation(B)
       => ( well_ordering(B)
         => well_ordering(relation_restriction(B,A)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t32_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_560,plain,
    ( reflexive(A)
    | ~ well_ordering(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_561,plain,
    ( transitive(A)
    | ~ well_ordering(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_562,plain,
    ( antisymmetric(A)
    | ~ well_ordering(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_563,plain,
    ( connected(A)
    | ~ well_ordering(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_564,plain,
    ( well_founded_relation(A)
    | ~ well_ordering(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_565,plain,
    ( ~ well_founded_relation(A)
    | ~ connected(A)
    | ~ antisymmetric(A)
    | ~ transitive(A)
    | ~ reflexive(A)
    | well_ordering(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d4_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_637,plain,
    ( relation(relation_restriction(A,B))
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_830,plain,
    ( reflexive(relation_restriction(A,B))
    | ~ reflexive(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t22_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_833,plain,
    ( connected(relation_restriction(A,B))
    | ~ connected(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t23_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_835,plain,
    ( transitive(relation_restriction(A,B))
    | ~ transitive(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t24_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_838,plain,
    ( antisymmetric(relation_restriction(A,B))
    | ~ antisymmetric(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t25_wellord1]) ).

cnf(c_849,plain,
    ( well_founded_relation(relation_restriction(A,B))
    | ~ well_founded_relation(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t31_wellord1]) ).

fof(nnf_314,plain,
    ? [A,B] :
      ( ~ well_ordering(relation_restriction(B,A))
      & well_ordering(B)
      & relation(B) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t32_wellord1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t32_wellord1_neg,plain,
    ( ~ well_ordering(relation_restriction(sK0,sK1))
    & well_ordering(sK0)
    & relation(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK1),skolemize(B,sK0)],[nnf_314]) ).

cnf(c_966,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t32_wellord1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_967,negated_conjecture,
    well_ordering(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t32_wellord1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_968,negated_conjecture,
    ~ well_ordering(relation_restriction(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t32_wellord1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_29823,negated_conjecture,
    ( reflexive(sK0)
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_560,c_967]) ).

cnf(c_1143,negated_conjecture,
    reflexive(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29823]) ).

cnf(c_29824,negated_conjecture,
    ( transitive(sK0)
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_561,c_967]) ).

cnf(c_1144,negated_conjecture,
    transitive(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29824]) ).

cnf(c_29825,negated_conjecture,
    ( antisymmetric(sK0)
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_562,c_967]) ).

cnf(c_1145,negated_conjecture,
    antisymmetric(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29825]) ).

cnf(c_29826,negated_conjecture,
    ( connected(sK0)
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_563,c_967]) ).

cnf(c_1146,negated_conjecture,
    connected(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29826]) ).

cnf(c_29827,negated_conjecture,
    ( well_founded_relation(sK0)
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_564,c_967]) ).

cnf(c_1147,negated_conjecture,
    well_founded_relation(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29827]) ).

cnf(c_1190,plain,
    relation(relation_restriction(sK0,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_637,c_966]) ).

cnf(c_29828,plain,
    ( reflexive(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_830,c_1143]) ).

cnf(c_24289,negated_conjecture,
    reflexive(relation_restriction(sK0,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29828]) ).

cnf(c_29829,plain,
    ( connected(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_833,c_1146]) ).

cnf(c_24440,negated_conjecture,
    connected(relation_restriction(sK0,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29829]) ).

cnf(c_29830,plain,
    ( transitive(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_835,c_1144]) ).

cnf(c_24681,negated_conjecture,
    transitive(relation_restriction(sK0,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29830]) ).

cnf(c_29831,plain,
    ( antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_838,c_1145]) ).

cnf(c_24759,negated_conjecture,
    antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK0,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29831]) ).

cnf(c_29832,plain,
    ( well_founded_relation(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ relation(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_849,c_1147]) ).

cnf(c_25072,negated_conjecture,
    well_founded_relation(relation_restriction(sK0,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_966,c_29832]) ).

cnf(c_29833,plain,
    ( ~ well_founded_relation(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ connected(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ transitive(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | well_ordering(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ relation(relation_restriction(sK0,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24289,c_565]) ).

cnf(c_29834,plain,
    ( ~ well_founded_relation(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ connected(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ transitive(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | well_ordering(relation_restriction(sK0,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1190,c_29833]) ).

cnf(c_29835,plain,
    ( ~ well_founded_relation(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ connected(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ antisymmetric(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | well_ordering(relation_restriction(sK0,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24681,c_29834]) ).

cnf(c_29836,plain,
    ( ~ well_founded_relation(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | ~ connected(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | well_ordering(relation_restriction(sK0,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24759,c_29835]) ).

cnf(c_29837,plain,
    ( ~ well_founded_relation(relation_restriction(sK0,A))
    | well_ordering(relation_restriction(sK0,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24440,c_29836]) ).

cnf(c_29821,plain,
    well_ordering(relation_restriction(sK0,A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25072,c_29837]) ).

cnf(c_29822,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29821,c_968]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU257+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.44  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.44  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 08:59:06 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.19/0.44  % Process 2392031 was started by sandbox2 on n013,
% 0.19/0.44  % Sat Sep 26 08:59:06 2026
% 0.19/0.44  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.31/0.57  
% 0.31/0.57  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.31/0.57  
% 0.31/0.57  % SInE: 269 to sos, 46 to usable, of 315 axioms (tolerance 2.00, depth 0 fixpoint).
% 103.46/14.82  
% 103.46/14.82  % given #500 (F,wt=18): 6839 cartesian_product2(A,B) != unordered_triple(C,empty_set,D).  [resolve(508,b,1872,a),unit_del(b,1480)].
% 103.46/14.82  
% 103.46/14.82  % given #1000 (W,wt=14): 14795 relation(relation_dom_restriction(c11,A)).  [resolve(645,a,353,a)].
% 103.46/14.82  
% 103.46/14.82  % given #1500 (F,wt=14): 23400 set_meet(c10) != c8.  [resolve(23101,b,16637,a)].
% 103.46/14.82  
% 103.46/14.82  % given #2000 (T,wt=14): 21861 relation(relation_composition(c7,empty_set)).  [resolve(752,a,14364,a)].
% 103.46/14.82  
% 103.46/14.82  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 103.46/14.82  
% 103.46/14.82  % Proof 1 at 4.45 (+ 1.37) seconds.
% 103.46/14.82  % Length of proof is 36.
% 103.46/14.82  % Level of proof is 5.
% 103.46/14.82  % Maximum clause weight is 118.000.
% 103.46/14.82  % Given clauses 2311.
% 103.46/14.82  
% 103.46/14.82  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------