%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEU263+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:38:15 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 6.38s 13.81s
% Output : Refutation 6.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 9 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 66 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 231 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 9 &; 193 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 24 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 81 ( 0 ^; 75 !; 6 ?; 81 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(relation_of2_as_subset_decl,type,
relation_of2_as_subset: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(subset_decl,type,
subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(relation_rng_decl,type,
relation_rng: $i > $i ).
thf(element_decl,type,
element: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(powerset_decl,type,
powerset: $i > $i ).
thf(cartesian_product2_decl,type,
cartesian_product2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(relation_decl,type,
relation: $i > $o ).
thf(relation_of2_decl,type,
relation_of2: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(relation_dom_decl,type,
relation_dom: $i > $i ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i] :
? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).
thf(57,plain,
! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( C @ relation_rng @ subset ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ relation_dom @ subset ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_relset_1) ).
thf(41,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( C @ relation_rng @ subset ) )
& ( A @ ( C @ relation_dom @ subset ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( D @ ( C @ subset ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( C @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t119_zfmisc_1) ).
thf(45,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ( D @ ( C @ subset ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( B @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( C @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ subset ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) )
<=> ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_m2_relset_1) ).
thf(49,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2 ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m2_relset_1) ).
thf(39,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ ( D @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( D @ relation_rng @ subset ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ ( D @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_relset_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ ( D @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( D @ relation_rng @ subset ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ ( D @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(16,plain,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( A @ ( C @ ( D @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( D @ relation_rng @ subset ) )
=> ( B @ ( C @ ( D @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_m2_relset_1) ).
thf(47,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2_as_subset ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) )
=> ( C @ relation ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc1_relset_1) ).
thf(21,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) )
=> ( C @ relation ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2 ) ) )
<=> ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( C @ subset ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_relset_1) ).
thf(33,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( C @ subset ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2 ) ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2 ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( C @ subset ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ subset ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_xboole_1) ).
thf(59,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ subset ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) )
<=> ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).
thf(27,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
=> ( B @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) ) )
& ( ( B @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
=> ( A @ relation_rng @ ( A @ relation_dom @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_relat_1) ).
thf(55,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ relation )
=> ( A @ relation_rng @ ( A @ relation_dom @ cartesian_product2 ) @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_relset_1) ).
thf(23,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ relation_of2 ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(82,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[25,57,41,45,49,39,16,47,21,33,59,27,55,23]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU263+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.17/10.66 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.17/10.66 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/10.66 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/10.66 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/10.66 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/10.66 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/10.66 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/10.66 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 09:00:58 UTC 2026
% 0.17/10.66 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/10.66 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.26/11.48 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.79/11.76 % [INFO] Parsing done (275ms).
% 1.79/11.79 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.83/12.37 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.83/12.38 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 3.19/12.53 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 19 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 3.36/12.61 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 13 axioms (removed 6 axioms).
% 3.36/12.66 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 3.36/12.67 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 3.36/12.67 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 6.38/13.80 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 6.38/13.80 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 6.38/13.80 % Time passed: 2938ms (effective reasoning time: 2008ms)
% 6.38/13.81 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 6.38/13.81 % Axioms used in derivation (13): redefinition_m2_relset_1, dt_m2_relset_1, t1_xboole_1, existence_m1_relset_1, existence_m2_relset_1, t21_relat_1, t12_relset_1, t3_subset, cc1_relset_1, existence_m1_subset_1, d1_relset_1, t119_zfmisc_1, reflexivity_r1_tarski
% 6.38/13.81 % No. of inferences in proof: 30
% 6.38/13.81 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2938 ms resp. 2008 ms w/o parsing
% 6.38/13.89 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 6.38/13.89 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------