↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : SEU264+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 08:53:26 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.68s 1.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  11   ~;   9   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (  28   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ relation_of2_as_subset > relation_of2 > subset > element > relation > cartesian_product2 > #nlpp > relation_rng > relation_dom > powerset > #skF_2 > #skF_7 > #skF_3 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_4 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(relation,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i > $i ).

tff(element,type,
    element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff(relation_dom,type,
    relation_dom: $i > $i ).

tff(relation_of2,type,
    relation_of2: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff(powerset,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

tff(relation_rng,type,
    relation_rng: $i > $i ).

tff(cartesian_product2,type,
    cartesian_product2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(relation_of2_as_subset,type,
    relation_of2_as_subset: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_69,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C,D] :
        ( relation_of2_as_subset(D,C,A)
       => ( subset(A,B)
         => relation_of2_as_subset(D,C,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t16_relset_1) ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( relation_of2_as_subset(C,A,B)
     => ( subset(relation_dom(C),A)
        & subset(relation_rng(C),B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_relset_1) ).

tff(f_75,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( subset(A,B)
        & subset(B,C) )
     => subset(A,C) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_xboole_1) ).

tff(f_62,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D] :
      ( relation_of2_as_subset(D,C,A)
     => ( subset(relation_rng(D),B)
       => relation_of2_as_subset(D,C,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_relset_1) ).

tff(c_36,plain,
    ~ relation_of2_as_subset('#skF_7','#skF_6','#skF_5'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    relation_of2_as_subset('#skF_7','#skF_6','#skF_4'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    ! [C_42,B_43,A_44] :
      ( subset(relation_rng(C_42),B_43)
      | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(C_42,A_44,B_43) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_68,plain,
    subset(relation_rng('#skF_7'),'#skF_4'),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_62]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    subset('#skF_4','#skF_5'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_140,plain,
    ! [A_75,C_76,B_77] :
      ( subset(A_75,C_76)
      | ~ subset(B_77,C_76)
      | ~ subset(A_75,B_77) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_75]) ).

tff(c_161,plain,
    ! [A_75] :
      ( subset(A_75,'#skF_5')
      | ~ subset(A_75,'#skF_4') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_140]) ).

tff(c_321,plain,
    ! [D_100,C_101,B_102,A_103] :
      ( relation_of2_as_subset(D_100,C_101,B_102)
      | ~ subset(relation_rng(D_100),B_102)
      | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(D_100,C_101,A_103) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_62]) ).

tff(c_480,plain,
    ! [D_118,C_119,A_120] :
      ( relation_of2_as_subset(D_118,C_119,'#skF_5')
      | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(D_118,C_119,A_120)
      | ~ subset(relation_rng(D_118),'#skF_4') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_161,c_321]) ).

tff(c_486,plain,
    ( relation_of2_as_subset('#skF_7','#skF_6','#skF_5')
    | ~ subset(relation_rng('#skF_7'),'#skF_4') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_480]) ).

tff(c_491,plain,
    relation_of2_as_subset('#skF_7','#skF_6','#skF_5'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_68,c_486]) ).

tff(c_493,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_36,c_491]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU264+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Apr  8 22:35:04 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.68/1.97  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.68/1.97  
% 3.68/1.97  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------