↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : SEU264+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:41:29 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.88s 8.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  10   ~;   8   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   5 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(X0,X0) ).

fof(t12_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X2,X0,X1)
     => ( subset('relation$urng'(X2),X1)
        & subset('relation$udom'(X2),X0) ) ) ).

fof(t14_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X3,X2,X0)
     => ( subset('relation$urng'(X3),X1)
       => 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X3,X2,X1) ) ) ).

fof(t1_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => subset(X0,X2) ) ).

fof(t16_relset_1,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X3,X2,X0)
     => ( subset(X0,X1)
       => 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X3,X2,X1) ) ) ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X3,X2,X0)
       => ( subset(X0,X1)
         => 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X3,X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[t16_relset_1]) ).

cnf(c7,plain,
    subset(X0,X0),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c9,plain,
    ( subset('relation$urng'(X0),X2)
    | ~ 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[t12_relset_1]) ).

cnf(c10,plain,
    ( 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X0,X1,X3)
    | ~ subset('relation$urng'(X0),X3)
    | ~ 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[t14_relset_1]) ).

cnf(c11,plain,
    ( subset(X0,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[t1_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c14,plain,
    'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(sK34,sK33,sK31),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c15,plain,
    subset(sK31,sK32),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c16,plain,
    ~ 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(sK34,sK33,sK32),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ( 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X0,X1,'relation$urng'(X0))
    | ~ 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c10,c7]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(sK34,sK33,'relation$urng'(sK34)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d0,c14]) ).

cnf(d2,plain,
    subset('relation$urng'(sK34),sK31),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c9,c14]) ).

cnf(d3,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,sK31)
    | subset(X0,sK32) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c11,c15]) ).

cnf(d4,plain,
    subset('relation$urng'(sK34),sK32),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,d2]) ).

cnf(d5,plain,
    ( 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(sK34,X0,sK32)
    | ~ 'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(sK34,X0,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d4,c10]) ).

cnf(d6,plain,
    'relation$uof2$uas$usubset'(sK34,sK33,sK32),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d5,d1]) ).

cnf(d7,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c16,d6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU264+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.40  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/5.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/5.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/5.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/5.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/5.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/5.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/5.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 09:01:49 UTC 2026
% 0.13/5.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/5.41  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.88/8.07  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 7.88/8.07  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------