%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SEU264+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:35:39 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.43s % Output : Refutation 0.19s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SEU264+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 16:59:09 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.43 % 0.19/0.43 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.19/0.43 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.19/0.43 % SZS status Theorem % 0.19/0.43 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.19/0.43 SPASS derived 21 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 32 clauses. % 0.19/0.43 SPASS allocated 85137 KBytes. % 0.19/0.43 SPASS spent 0:00:00.08 on the problem. % 0.19/0.43 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.19/0.43 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.19/0.43 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.19/0.43 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.19/0.43 0:00:00.00 for the reduction. % 0.19/0.43 % 0.19/0.43 % 0.19/0.43 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 11 : % 0.19/0.43 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.19/0.43 1[0:Inp] || -> subset(skc7,skc4)*r. % 0.19/0.43 3[0:Inp] || -> relation_of2_as_subset(skc6,skc5,skc7)*. % 0.19/0.43 5[0:Inp] || relation_of2_as_subset(skc6,skc5,skc4)* -> . % 0.19/0.43 14[0:Inp] || relation_of2_as_subset(u,v,w)* -> subset(relation_rng(u),w). % 0.19/0.43 16[0:Inp] || subset(u,v)* subset(v,w)* -> subset(u,w)*. % 0.19/0.43 17[0:Inp] || subset(relation_rng(u),v) relation_of2_as_subset(u,w,x)* -> relation_of2_as_subset(u,w,v)*. % 0.19/0.43 19[0:Res:3.0,14.0] || -> subset(relation_rng(skc6),skc7)*l. % 0.19/0.43 24[0:Res:17.2,5.0] || subset(relation_rng(skc6),skc4) relation_of2_as_subset(skc6,skc5,u)* -> . % 0.19/0.43 26[0:Res:3.0,24.1] || subset(relation_rng(skc6),skc4)*l -> . % 0.19/0.43 38[0:NCh:16.2,16.0,26.0,19.0] || subset(skc7,skc4)*r -> . % 0.19/0.43 39[0:MRR:38.0,1.0] || -> . % 0.19/0.43 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.19/0.43 Formulae used in the proof : t16_relset_1 t12_relset_1 t1_xboole_1 t14_relset_1 % 0.19/0.43 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------