↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU268+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:56:26 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 50.63s 7.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 50.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  218 (  40 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  271 ( 107   ~; 112   |;  39   &)
%                                         (   9 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  104 (   0 sgn  95   !;   9   ?;  19   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f15,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
    <=> ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ( X1 = inclusion_relation(X0)
      <=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
              ( ( in(X3,X0)
                & in(X2,X0) )
             => ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
              <=> subset(X2,X3) ) )
          & relation_field(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_wellord2) ).

fof(f61,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),singleton(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).

fof(f86,axiom,
    ! [X0] : relation(inclusion_relation(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_wellord2) ).

fof(f157,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( relation(X0)
     => ( reflexive(X0)
      <=> ! [X1] :
            ( in(X1,relation_field(X0))
           => in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l1_wellord1) ).

fof(f259,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_wellord2) ).

fof(f260,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0)),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f259]) ).

fof(f321,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(f361,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( reflexive(X0)
      <=> ! [X1] :
            ( ~ in(X1,relation_field(X0))
            | in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),X0) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).

fof(f453,plain,
    ? [X0] : ~ reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0)),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f260]) ).

fof(f632,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X1)
      | ( X1 = inclusion_relation(X0)
      <=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
              ( ~ in(X3,X0)
              | ~ in(X2,X0)
              | ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
              <=> subset(X2,X3) ) )
          & relation_field(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f633,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X1)
      | ( X1 = inclusion_relation(X0)
      <=> ( ! [X2,X3] :
              ( ~ in(X3,X0)
              | ~ in(X2,X0)
              | ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
              <=> subset(X2,X3) ) )
          & relation_field(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f632]) ).

fof(f690,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( ( ~ reflexive(X0)
          | ! [X1] :
              ( ~ in(X1,relation_field(X0))
              | in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),X0) ) )
        & ( ? [X1] :
              ( in(X1,relation_field(X0))
              & ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),X0) )
          | reflexive(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f361]) ).

fof(f691,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( ( ~ reflexive(X0)
          | ! [X2] :
              ( ~ in(X2,relation_field(X0))
              | in(ordered_pair(X2,X2),X0) ) )
        & ( ? [X1] :
              ( in(X1,relation_field(X0))
              & ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),X0) )
          | reflexive(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f690]) ).

fof(f692,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ( ( ~ reflexive(X0)
          | ! [X2] :
              ( ~ in(X2,relation_field(X0))
              | in(ordered_pair(X2,X2),X0) ) )
        & ( ( in(sK3(X0),relation_field(X0))
            & ~ in(ordered_pair(sK3(X0),sK3(X0)),X0) )
          | reflexive(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(X1,sK3(X0))],[f691]) ).

fof(f732,plain,
    ~ reflexive(inclusion_relation(sK19)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK19]),skolemize(X0,sK19)],[f453]) ).

fof(f814,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 != X1
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f815,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 != X1
        | ( subset(X1,X0)
          & subset(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f814]) ).

fof(f892,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X1)
      | ( ( inclusion_relation(X0) != X1
          | ( ! [X2,X3] :
                ( ~ in(X3,X0)
                | ~ in(X2,X0)
                | ( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
                    | subset(X2,X3) )
                  & ( ~ subset(X2,X3)
                    | in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ) ) )
            & relation_field(X1) = X0 ) )
        & ( ? [X2,X3] :
              ( in(X3,X0)
              & in(X2,X0)
              & ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
                | subset(X2,X3) )
              & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
                | ~ subset(X2,X3) ) )
          | relation_field(X1) != X0
          | X1 = inclusion_relation(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f633]) ).

fof(f893,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X1)
      | ( ( inclusion_relation(X0) != X1
          | ( ! [X2,X3] :
                ( ~ in(X3,X0)
                | ~ in(X2,X0)
                | ( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
                    | subset(X2,X3) )
                  & ( ~ subset(X2,X3)
                    | in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ) ) )
            & relation_field(X1) = X0 ) )
        & ( ? [X2,X3] :
              ( in(X3,X0)
              & in(X2,X0)
              & ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
                | subset(X2,X3) )
              & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
                | ~ subset(X2,X3) ) )
          | relation_field(X1) != X0
          | X1 = inclusion_relation(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f892]) ).

fof(f894,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X1)
      | ( ( inclusion_relation(X0) != X1
          | ( ! [X4,X5] :
                ( ~ in(X5,X0)
                | ~ in(X4,X0)
                | ( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1)
                    | subset(X4,X5) )
                  & ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
                    | in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1) ) ) )
            & relation_field(X1) = X0 ) )
        & ( ? [X2,X3] :
              ( in(X3,X0)
              & in(X2,X0)
              & ( in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
                | subset(X2,X3) )
              & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1)
                | ~ subset(X2,X3) ) )
          | relation_field(X1) != X0
          | X1 = inclusion_relation(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f893]) ).

fof(f895,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X1)
      | ( ( inclusion_relation(X0) != X1
          | ( ! [X4,X5] :
                ( ~ in(X5,X0)
                | ~ in(X4,X0)
                | ( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1)
                    | subset(X4,X5) )
                  & ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
                    | in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1) ) ) )
            & relation_field(X1) = X0 ) )
        & ( ( in(sK104(X0,X1),X0)
            & in(sK103(X0,X1),X0)
            & ( in(ordered_pair(sK103(X0,X1),sK104(X0,X1)),X1)
              | subset(sK103(X0,X1),sK104(X0,X1)) )
            & ( ~ in(ordered_pair(sK103(X0,X1),sK104(X0,X1)),X1)
              | ~ subset(sK103(X0,X1),sK104(X0,X1)) ) )
          | relation_field(X1) != X0
          | X1 = inclusion_relation(X0) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK103,sK104]),skolemize(X2,sK103(X0,X1)),skolemize(X3,sK104(X0,X1))],[f894]) ).

fof(f950,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | in(sK3(X0),relation_field(X0))
      | reflexive(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f692]) ).

fof(f951,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ in(ordered_pair(sK3(X0),sK3(X0)),X0)
      | reflexive(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f692]) ).

fof(f1070,plain,
    ~ reflexive(inclusion_relation(sK19)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f732]) ).

fof(f1176,plain,
    ! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f321]) ).

fof(f1280,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 != X1
      | subset(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f815]) ).

fof(f1355,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),singleton(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f1487,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation(inclusion_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f1489,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ relation(X1)
      | inclusion_relation(X0) != X1
      | ~ in(X5,X0)
      | ~ in(X4,X0)
      | ~ subset(X4,X5)
      | in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f895]) ).

fof(f1490,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation(X1)
      | inclusion_relation(X0) != X1
      | relation_field(X1) = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f895]) ).

fof(f1621,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X1),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1355,f1176]) ).

fof(f1622,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK3(X0),sK3(X0)),unordered_pair(sK3(X0),sK3(X0))),X0)
      | reflexive(X0) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f951,f1621]) ).

fof(f1783,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ relation(X1)
      | inclusion_relation(X0) != X1
      | ~ in(X5,X0)
      | ~ in(X4,X0)
      | ~ subset(X4,X5)
      | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X5),unordered_pair(X4,X4)),X1) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f1489,f1621]) ).

fof(f1859,plain,
    ! [X1] : subset(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f1280]) ).

fof(f1916,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ relation(inclusion_relation(X0))
      | relation_field(inclusion_relation(X0)) = X0 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f1490]) ).

fof(f1917,plain,
    ! [X0,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ relation(inclusion_relation(X0))
      | ~ in(X5,X0)
      | ~ in(X4,X0)
      | ~ subset(X4,X5)
      | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X5),unordered_pair(X4,X4)),inclusion_relation(X0)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f1783]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( reflexive(X0)
      | ~ relation(X0)
      | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(sK3(X0),sK3(X0)),unordered_pair(sK3(X0),sK3(X0))),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1622]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( reflexive(X0)
      | in(sK3(X0),relation_field(X0))
      | ~ relation(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f950]) ).

tcf(c_170,negated_conjecture,
    ~ reflexive(inclusion_relation(sK19)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1070]) ).

tcf(c_380,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : subset(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1859]) ).

tcf(c_583,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation(inclusion_relation(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1487]) ).

tcf(c_588,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( relation_field(inclusion_relation(X0)) = X0 )
      | ~ relation(inclusion_relation(X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1916]) ).

tcf(c_589,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X2),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),inclusion_relation(X1))
      | ~ relation(inclusion_relation(X1))
      | ~ subset(X0,X2)
      | ~ in(X2,X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1917]) ).

tcf(c_1157,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : relation_field(inclusion_relation(X0)) = X0,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_588,c_583,c_588]) ).

tcf(c_2792,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X2),unordered_pair(X0,X0)),inclusion_relation(X1))
      | ~ subset(X0,X2)
      | ~ in(X2,X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_589,c_583]) ).

tcf(c_43644,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0))
      | in(sK3(inclusion_relation(X0)),X0)
      | ~ relation(inclusion_relation(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1157,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_43666,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0))
      | in(sK3(inclusion_relation(X0)),X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_43644,c_583]) ).

tcf(c_67842,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0))
      | in(sK3(inclusion_relation(X0)),X0)
      | ~ relation(inclusion_relation(X0)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1157,c_50]) ).

tcf(c_67864,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0))
      | in(sK3(inclusion_relation(X0)),X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_67842,c_583]) ).

tcf(c_126100,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0))
      | ~ relation(inclusion_relation(X0))
      | ~ in(sK3(inclusion_relation(X0)),X0)
      | ~ subset(sK3(inclusion_relation(X0)),sK3(inclusion_relation(X0))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2792,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_126169,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0))
      | ~ in(sK3(inclusion_relation(X0)),X0) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_126100,c_583,c_380]) ).

tcf(c_179036,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : reflexive(inclusion_relation(X0)),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_67864,c_43666,c_126169]) ).

tcf(c_179039,plain,
    $false,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_170,c_179036]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU268+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 13:31:11 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.43  
% 0.11/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.45  % Proving...
% 50.63/7.90  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 50.63/7.90  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % ------  iProver source info
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 50.63/7.90  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 50.63/7.90  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Parsing...
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 70  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 2 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 3 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Proving...
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % 
% 50.63/7.90  % clauses                               604
% 50.63/7.90  % conjectures                           1
% 50.63/7.90  % EPR                                   93
% 50.63/7.90  % Horn                                  474
% 50.63/7.90  % unary                                 75
% 50.63/7.90  % binary                                166
% 50.63/7.90  % lits                                  1808
% 50.63/7.90  % lits eq                               273
% 50.63/7.90  % fd_pure                               0
% 50.63/7.90  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 50.63/7.90  % fd_cond                               18
% 50.63/7.90  % fd_pseudo_cond                        96
% 50.63/7.90  % AC symbols                            0
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ 
% 50.63/7.90  % Current options:
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ 
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % 
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % ------ Proving...
% 50.63/7.90  % 
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 50.63/7.90  
% 50.63/7.90  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------