↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU269+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:20:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.14s 1.31s
% Output   : Refutation 1.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  15 unt;   5 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   54 (   5 equ;  29 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | transitive(X)
    | ~ is_transitive_in(X,relation_field(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d16_relat_2) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | X != inclusion_relation(Y)
    | relation_field(X) = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_wellord2) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | X != inclusion_relation(Y)
    | ~ in(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(U,Y)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Z,U),X)
    | subset(Z,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_wellord2) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | X != inclusion_relation(Y)
    | ~ in(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(U,Y)
    | in(ordered_pair(Z,U),X)
    | ~ subset(Z,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_wellord2) ).

cnf(20,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV3'(Y,X),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(21,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV4'(Y,X),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(22,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV5'(Y,X),Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(23,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAV4'(Y,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV4'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAV5'(Y,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(25,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAV5'(Y,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    relation(inclusion_relation(X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_wellord2) ).

cnf(58,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(X,Y)
    | ~ subset(Y,Z)
    | subset(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_xboole_1) ).

cnf(62,negated_conjecture,
    ~ transitive(inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_wellord2) ).

cnf(87,plain,
    ~ is_transitive_in(inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16'),relation_field(inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,26,62]) ).

cnf(111,plain,
    relation_field(inclusion_relation(X)) = X,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,26,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(113,plain,
    ~ is_transitive_in(inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16'),'SKOLEMAAAV16'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[87,111,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(153,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV16'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,113,26]) ).

cnf(154,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV16'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[21,113,26]) ).

cnf(155,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV16'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[20,113,26]) ).

cnf(156,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16'))),inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[25,113,26]) ).

cnf(157,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16'))),inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[24,113,26]) ).

cnf(158,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16'))),inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[23,113,26]) ).

cnf(531,plain,
    ~ subset('SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,156,26,155,153,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(536,plain,
    subset('SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,157,26,154,153,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(540,plain,
    ~ subset('SKOLEMAAAV3'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16')),'SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV16',inclusion_relation('SKOLEMAAAV16'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[58,536,531]) ).

cnf(545,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,540,26,155,154,theory(equality)]),158]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU269+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:34:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T11:34:08
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n004.cluster.edu at 2022-06-19T11:34:08
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.20/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|set_union2| ?X ?Y) (|set_union2| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.20/0.50  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|set_union2| ?X |empty_set|) ?X).
% 0.20/0.50  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 0.20/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.50     |one_to_one| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.20/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.50     |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.20/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.50     |function| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.14/1.31  ; Declaring set_union2 to be commutative.
% 1.14/1.31  
% 1.14/1.31  #||
% 1.14/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.14/1.31  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.14/1.31  ||#
% 1.14/1.31  
% 1.14/1.31  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.14/1.31  ;      2903 formulas have been input or derived (from 301 formulas).
% 1.14/1.31  ;       545 (19%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.14/1.31  ;           38 ( 7%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.14/1.31  ;          507 (93%) are still being kept.
% 1.14/1.31  ; 
% 1.14/1.31  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.008   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.003   0%   Assert                       (52 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.040   5%   Process new row              (1,919 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.677  81%   Resolution                   (600 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.008   1%   Paramodulation               (300 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (43 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.002   0%   Condensing                   (240 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.020   2%   Forward subsumption          (240 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.000   0%   Backward subsumption         (144 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (132 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.035   4%   Forward simplification       (1,862 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.007   1%   Backward simplification      (545 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.001   0%   Ordering                     (380 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.028   3%   Other
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.831        Total
% 1.14/1.31  ;     0.837        Real time
% 1.14/1.31  ; 
% 1.14/1.31  ; Term-hash-array has 921 terms in all.
% 1.14/1.31  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 141 entries (141 at peak, 144 added, 3 deleted).
% 1.14/1.31  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 627 nodes (627 at peak, 627 added, 0 deleted).
% 1.14/1.31  ;  Retrieved 165 possibly forward subsuming rows in 240 calls.
% 1.14/1.31  ;  Retrieved 10 possibly backward subsumed rows in 144 calls.
% 1.14/1.31  ; Path-index has 890 entries (890 at peak, 935 added, 45 deleted).
% 1.14/1.31  ; Path-index has 2,494 nodes (2,494 at peak, 2,538 added, 44 deleted).
% 1.14/1.31  ; Trie-index has 890 entries (890 at peak, 935 added, 45 deleted).
% 1.14/1.31  ; Trie-index has 4,032 nodes (4,032 at peak, 4,129 added, 97 deleted).
% 1.14/1.31  ; Retrieved 4,867 generalization terms in 7,757 calls.
% 1.14/1.31  ; Retrieved 407 instance terms in 400 calls.
% 1.14/1.31  ; Retrieved 929,817 unifiable terms in 96,847 calls.
% 1.14/1.31  ; 
% 1.14/1.31  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 1.14/1.31  ;     1 with value 21              1 with value 25
% 1.14/1.31  ; The agenda of rows to give has 218 entries:
% 1.14/1.31  ;    19 with value (4 18)         13 with value (4 25)           4 with value (4 32)
% 1.14/1.31  ;    40 with value (4 19)          3 with value (4 26)           2 with value (4 34)
% 1.14/1.31  ;    29 with value (4 20)         10 with value (4 27)           9 with value (4 35)
% 1.14/1.31  ;     9 with value (4 21)          8 with value (4 28)          10 with value (4 36)
% 1.14/1.31  ;    11 with value (4 22)          4 with value (4 29)           3 with value (4 38)
% 1.14/1.31  ;    22 with value (4 23)          2 with value (4 30)           2 with value (4 41)
% 1.14/1.31  ;    11 with value (4 24)          7 with value (4 31)
% 1.14/1.31  Evaluation took:
% 1.14/1.31    0.837 seconds of real time
% 1.14/1.31    0.81302 seconds of user run time
% 1.14/1.31    0.024009 seconds of system run time
% 1.14/1.31    [Run times include 0.035 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.14/1.31    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.14/1.31    0 page faults and
% 1.14/1.31    89,022,440 bytes consed.
% 1.14/1.31  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.14/1.31  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T11:34:09
% 1.14/1.31  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.14/1.31  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------