%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU271+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:31 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 78.82s 11.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 78.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 47 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 195 ( 42 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 33 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 249 ( 101 ~; 118 |; 20 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 98 ( 2 sgn 35 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d1_wellord2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = inclusion_relation(X1)
<=> ( ! [X3,X4] :
( ( in(X4,X1)
& in(X3,X1) )
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> subset(X3,X4) ) )
& relation_field(X2) = X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_wellord2) ).
fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_tarski) ).
fof(d4_relat_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3,X4] :
( ( in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1)
& in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
& in(X4,X2)
& in(X3,X2) )
=> X3 = X4 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_2) ).
fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).
fof(dt_k1_wellord2,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(inclusion_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_wellord2) ).
fof(d12_relat_2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ( antisymmetric(X1)
<=> is_antisymmetric_in(X1,relation_field(X1)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d12_relat_2) ).
fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
<=> ( subset(X2,X1)
& subset(X1,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).
fof(t5_wellord2,conjecture,
! [X1] : antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t5_wellord2) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X19,X20,X21,X22] :
( ( ~ relation(X20)
| X20 = inclusion_relation(X19)
| relation_field(X20) != X19
| subset(esk1_2(X19,X20),esk2_2(X19,X20))
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_2(X19,X20),esk2_2(X19,X20)),X20) )
& ( ~ relation(X20)
| X20 = inclusion_relation(X19)
| relation_field(X20) != X19
| ~ subset(esk1_2(X19,X20),esk2_2(X19,X20))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_2(X19,X20),esk2_2(X19,X20)),X20) )
& ( ~ relation(X20)
| X20 = inclusion_relation(X19)
| relation_field(X20) != X19
| in(esk2_2(X19,X20),X19) )
& ( ~ relation(X20)
| X20 = inclusion_relation(X19)
| relation_field(X20) != X19
| in(esk1_2(X19,X20),X19) )
& ( ~ relation(X20)
| X20 != inclusion_relation(X19)
| ~ in(X22,X19)
| ~ in(X21,X19)
| in(ordered_pair(X21,X22),X20)
| ~ subset(X21,X22) )
& ( ~ relation(X20)
| X20 != inclusion_relation(X19)
| ~ in(X22,X19)
| ~ in(X21,X19)
| subset(X21,X22)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X21,X22),X20) )
& ( ~ relation(X20)
| X20 != inclusion_relation(X19)
| relation_field(X20) = X19 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_wellord2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X32,X33] : ordered_pair(X32,X33) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X32,X33),singleton(X32)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X25,X26,X27,X28,X29] :
( ( ~ relation(X25)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X25,X29)
| esk3_2(X25,X29) != esk4_2(X25,X29) )
& ( ~ relation(X25)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X25,X29)
| in(ordered_pair(esk4_2(X25,X29),esk3_2(X25,X29)),X25) )
& ( ~ relation(X25)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X25,X29)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_2(X25,X29),esk4_2(X25,X29)),X25) )
& ( ~ relation(X25)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X25,X29)
| in(esk4_2(X25,X29),X29) )
& ( ~ relation(X25)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X25,X29)
| in(esk3_2(X25,X29),X29) )
& ( ~ relation(X25)
| X27 = X28
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X28,X27),X25)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X27,X28),X25)
| ~ in(X28,X26)
| ~ in(X27,X26)
| ~ is_antisymmetric_in(X25,X26) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_2])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != inclusion_relation(X4)
| ~ in(X2,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X4)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X12,X13] : unordered_pair(X12,X13) = unordered_pair(X13,X12),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),X3)
| ~ in(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X2,X4)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != inclusion_relation(X4)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk4_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2))),X1)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ in(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X2,X4)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X2,X1),singleton(X1)),X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != inclusion_relation(X4)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk4_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2)),singleton(esk4_2(X1,X2))),X1)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X35] : relation(inclusion_relation(X35)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_wellord2]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ in(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X2,X4)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,X2)),X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != inclusion_relation(X4)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk3_2(X1,X2)),unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2))),X1)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ in(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X2,X4)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X2,X1)),X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != inclusion_relation(X4)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| in(unordered_pair(singleton(esk4_2(X1,X2)),unordered_pair(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2))),X1)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).
fof(c_0_26,plain,
! [X18] :
( ( ~ relation(X18)
| antisymmetric(X18)
| ~ is_antisymmetric_in(X18,relation_field(X18)) )
& ( ~ relation(X18)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X18,relation_field(X18))
| ~ antisymmetric(X18) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d12_relat_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != inclusion_relation(X2)
| relation_field(X1) = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
relation(inclusion_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
fof(c_0_29,plain,
! [X16,X17] :
( ( X16 = X17
| ~ subset(X17,X16)
| ~ subset(X16,X17) )
& ( X16 != X17
| subset(X17,X16) )
& ( X16 != X17
| subset(X16,X17) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != inclusion_relation(X3)
| subset(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2))
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2)
| in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2)
| in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ in(esk4_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ in(esk3_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != inclusion_relation(X3)
| subset(esk4_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2))
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
fof(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] : antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(X1)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t5_wellord2]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| ~ is_antisymmetric_in(X1,relation_field(X1))
| antisymmetric(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
relation_field(inclusion_relation(X1)) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]),c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ subset(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != inclusion_relation(X2)
| subset(esk3_2(X1,X2),esk4_2(X1,X2))
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != inclusion_relation(X2)
| subset(esk4_2(X1,X2),esk3_2(X1,X2))
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_31]),c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| esk3_2(X1,X2) != esk4_2(X1,X2)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
~ antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(esk15_0)),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ is_antisymmetric_in(inclusion_relation(X1),X1)
| antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != inclusion_relation(X2)
| is_antisymmetric_in(X1,X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
~ antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(esk15_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_28])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU271+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:07:28 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 78.82/11.97 % Version: 3.5.1
% 78.82/11.97 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 78.82/11.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1135563 completed with status 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 78.82/11.97 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 78.82/11.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 78.82/11.97 % No SInE strategy applied
% 78.82/11.97 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 78.82/11.97 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 1135576 completed with status 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 78.82/11.97 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 78.82/11.97 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 78.82/11.97 % No SInE strategy applied
% 78.82/11.97 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 78.82/11.97 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 78.82/11.97 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 78.82/11.97
% 78.82/11.97 % Proof found!
% 78.82/11.97 % SZS status Theorem
% 78.82/11.97 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 78.82/11.97 % Parsed axioms : 52
% 78.82/11.97 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Initial clauses : 97
% 78.82/11.97 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 13
% 78.82/11.97 % Initial clauses in saturation : 84
% 78.82/11.97 % Processed clauses : 16453
% 78.82/11.97 % ...of these trivial : 21
% 78.82/11.97 % ...subsumed : 12575
% 78.82/11.97 % ...remaining for further processing : 3857
% 78.82/11.97 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 675
% 78.82/11.97 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Backward-subsumed : 335
% 78.82/11.97 % Backward-rewritten : 153
% 78.82/11.97 % Generated clauses : 429140
% 78.82/11.97 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 424101
% 78.82/11.97 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 300
% 78.82/11.97 % Paramodulations : 428126
% 78.82/11.97 % Factorizations : 202
% 78.82/11.97 % NegExts : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Equation resolutions : 812
% 78.82/11.97 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Total rewrite steps : 63701
% 78.82/11.97 % ...of those cached : 63341
% 78.82/11.97 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Propositional check models : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 78.82/11.97 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 78.82/11.97 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 78.82/11.97 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 78.82/11.97 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 78.82/11.97 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 78.82/11.97 % Current number of processed clauses : 3367
% 78.82/11.97 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 41
% 78.82/11.97 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 78.82/11.97 % Negative unit clauses : 11
% 78.82/11.97 % Non-unit-clauses : 3313
% 78.82/11.97 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 405925
% 78.82/11.97 % ...number of literals in the above : 3146589
% 78.82/11.97 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Current number of archived clauses : 489
% 78.82/11.97 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3268601
% 78.82/11.97 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 562963
% 78.82/11.97 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12665
% 78.82/11.97 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5945
% 78.82/11.97 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % BW rewrite match attempts : 64
% 78.82/11.97 % BW rewrite match successes : 58
% 78.82/11.97 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Condensation successes : 0
% 78.82/11.97 % Termbank termtop insertions : 12363207
% 78.82/11.97 % Search garbage collected termcells : 745
% 78.82/11.97
% 78.82/11.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 78.82/11.97 % User time : 10.992 s
% 78.82/11.97 % System time : 0.276 s
% 78.82/11.97 % Total time : 11.268 s
% 78.82/11.97 % Maximum resident set size: 3416 pages
% 78.82/11.97
% 78.82/11.97 % -------------------------------------------------
% 78.82/11.97 % User time : 53.998 s
% 78.82/11.97 % System time : 1.740 s
% 78.82/11.97 % Total time : 55.738 s
% 78.82/11.97 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 78.82/11.97 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------