%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU290+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.42s 2.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 16 unt; 2 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 62 ( 15 equ; 34 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_81,plain,
( X1 = empty_set
| relation_dom_as_subset(X2,X1,X3) = X2
| ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ quasi_total(X3,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_81) ).
cnf(i_0_1369,negated_conjecture,
relation_of2_as_subset(esk254_0,esk251_0,esk252_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_1369) ).
cnf(i_0_1370,negated_conjecture,
quasi_total(esk254_0,esk251_0,esk252_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_1370) ).
cnf(i_0_1367,negated_conjecture,
esk252_0 != empty_set,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_1367) ).
cnf(i_0_232,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_rng(X3)
| X1 != apply(X3,X4)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_232) ).
cnf(i_0_476,plain,
( relation_dom_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) = relation_dom(X3)
| ~ relation_of2(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_476) ).
cnf(i_0_1366,negated_conjecture,
~ in(apply(esk254_0,esk253_0),relation_rng(esk254_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_1366) ).
cnf(i_0_1371,negated_conjecture,
function(esk254_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_1371) ).
cnf(i_0_482,plain,
( relation_of2(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_482) ).
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
( relation(X1)
| ~ element(X1,powerset(cartesian_product2(X2,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_320,plain,
( element(X1,powerset(cartesian_product2(X2,X3)))
| ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_320) ).
cnf(i_0_1368,negated_conjecture,
in(esk253_0,esk251_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4f5dkaph/lgb.p',i_0_1368) ).
cnf(c_0_1384,plain,
( X1 = empty_set
| relation_dom_as_subset(X2,X1,X3) = X2
| ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ quasi_total(X3,X2,X1) ),
i_0_81 ).
cnf(c_0_1385,negated_conjecture,
relation_of2_as_subset(esk254_0,esk251_0,esk252_0),
i_0_1369 ).
cnf(c_0_1386,negated_conjecture,
quasi_total(esk254_0,esk251_0,esk252_0),
i_0_1370 ).
cnf(c_0_1387,negated_conjecture,
esk252_0 != empty_set,
i_0_1367 ).
cnf(c_0_1388,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_rng(X3)
| X1 != apply(X3,X4)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
i_0_232 ).
cnf(c_0_1389,plain,
( relation_dom_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) = relation_dom(X3)
| ~ relation_of2(X3,X1,X2) ),
i_0_476 ).
cnf(c_0_1390,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom_as_subset(esk251_0,esk252_0,esk254_0) = esk251_0,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1384,c_0_1385]),c_0_1386])]),c_0_1387]) ).
cnf(c_0_1391,negated_conjecture,
~ in(apply(esk254_0,esk253_0),relation_rng(esk254_0)),
i_0_1366 ).
cnf(c_0_1392,plain,
( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_1388])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1393,negated_conjecture,
function(esk254_0),
i_0_1371 ).
cnf(c_0_1394,plain,
( relation_dom(esk254_0) = esk251_0
| ~ relation_of2(esk254_0,esk251_0,esk252_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1389,c_0_1390]) ).
cnf(c_0_1395,plain,
( relation_of2(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_482 ).
cnf(c_0_1396,plain,
( relation(X1)
| ~ element(X1,powerset(cartesian_product2(X2,X3))) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_1397,plain,
( element(X1,powerset(cartesian_product2(X2,X3)))
| ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
i_0_320 ).
cnf(c_0_1398,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(esk254_0)
| ~ in(esk253_0,relation_dom(esk254_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1391,c_0_1392]),c_0_1393])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1399,plain,
relation_dom(esk254_0) = esk251_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1394,c_0_1395]),c_0_1385])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1400,negated_conjecture,
in(esk253_0,esk251_0),
i_0_1368 ).
cnf(c_0_1401,plain,
( relation(X1)
| ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1396,c_0_1397]) ).
cnf(c_0_1402,negated_conjecture,
~ relation(esk254_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1398,c_0_1399]),c_0_1400])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1403,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1401,c_0_1385]),c_0_1402]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU290+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 10:10:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.42/2.97 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.42/2.97 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.42/2.97 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.42/2.97 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.42/2.97 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 9.42/2.97 #
% 9.42/2.97 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 9.42/2.97 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.42/2.97
% 9.42/2.97 # Proof found!
% 9.42/2.97 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.42/2.97 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.42/2.97 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.42/2.97
% 9.42/2.97 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.42/2.97 # User time : 0.103 s
% 9.42/2.97 # System time : 0.008 s
% 9.42/2.97 # Total time : 0.112 s
% 9.42/2.97 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 9.42/2.97
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------