↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SEU294+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:56:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.88s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  13 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  21   ~;  14   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn  26   !;   4   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( finite(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( element(X1,powerset(X0))
         => finite(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cc2_finset_1) ).

fof(f46,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( finite(X1)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => finite(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t13_finset_1) ).

fof(f47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ( finite(X1)
          & subset(X0,X1) )
       => finite(X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f46]) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( element(X0,powerset(X1))
    <=> subset(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
     => element(X0,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ finite(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ element(X1,powerset(X0))
          | finite(X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( finite(X1)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & ~ finite(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( finite(X1)
      & subset(X0,X1)
      & ~ finite(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | element(X0,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( finite(sK27)
    & subset(sK26,sK27)
    & ~ finite(sK26) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK26,sK27]),skolemize(X0,sK26),skolemize(X1,sK27)],[f97]) ).

fof(f147,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ finite(X0)
      | ~ element(X1,powerset(X0))
      | finite(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f243,plain,
    finite(sK27),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f244,plain,
    subset(sK26,sK27),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f245,plain,
    ~ finite(sK26),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f248,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | element(X0,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f101]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( finite(X0)
      | ~ finite(X1)
      | ~ element(X0,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f147]) ).

tcf(c_153,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(sK26),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f245]) ).

tcf(c_154,negated_conjecture,
    subset(sK26,sK27),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f244]) ).

tcf(c_155,negated_conjecture,
    finite(sK27),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f243]) ).

tcf(c_158,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( element(X0,powerset(X1))
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f248]) ).

tcf(c_617,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( element(X0,powerset(X1))
      | ( X1 != sK27 )
      | ( X0 != sK26 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_154,c_158]) ).

tcf(c_618,plain,
    element(sK26,powerset(sK27)),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_617]) ).

tcf(c_823,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = powerset(sK27),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_824,plain,
    element(sK26,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_618,c_823]) ).

tcf(c_825,negated_conjecture,
    finite(sK27),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_155]) ).

tcf(c_826,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(sK26),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_153]) ).

tcf(c_1188,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( finite(X0)
      | ~ finite(sK27)
      | ~ element(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_823,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_1191,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( finite(X0)
      | ~ element(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1188,c_825]) ).

tcf(c_1227,plain,
    finite(sK26),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_824,c_1191]) ).

tcf(c_1231,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1227,c_826]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU294+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 13:34:38 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.88/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.88/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.88/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 69 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 7 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % 
% 1.88/1.28  % clauses                               43
% 1.88/1.28  % conjectures                           2
% 1.88/1.28  % EPR                                   26
% 1.88/1.28  % Horn                                  39
% 1.88/1.28  % unary                                 28
% 1.88/1.28  % binary                                10
% 1.88/1.28  % lits                                  63
% 1.88/1.28  % lits eq                               3
% 1.88/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.88/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.88/1.28  % fd_cond                               1
% 1.88/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        1
% 1.88/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.88/1.28  % Current options:
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % 
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.88/1.28  % 
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.88/1.28  
% 1.88/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------