↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : SEU303+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 15:02:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.51s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : SEU303+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 10:50:23 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.46/0.54  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.58  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.51/0.58  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.58  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.51/0.58  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.51/0.58  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.51/0.58  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.51/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.58  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.58  % File     : SEU303+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.51/0.58  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.51/0.58  % Problem  : MPTP bushy problem t26_finset_1
% 0.51/0.58  % Version  : [Urb07] axioms : Especial.
% 0.51/0.58  % English  :
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  % Refs     : [Ban01] Bancerek et al. (2001), On the Characterizations of Co
% 0.51/0.58  %          : [Urb07] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.51/0.58  % Source   : [Urb07]
% 0.51/0.58  % Names    : bushy-t26_finset_1 [Urb07]
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.51/0.58  % Rating   : 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.04 v5.4.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.04 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.3.0
% 0.51/0.58  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.51/0.58  %            Number of atoms       :   19 (   1 equ)
% 0.51/0.58  %            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
% 0.51/0.58  %            Number of connectives :   11 (   0   ~;   0   |;   5   &)
% 0.51/0.58  %                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.51/0.58  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
% 0.51/0.58  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.51/0.58  %            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% 0.51/0.58  %            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.51/0.58  %            Number of variables   :    7 (   6   !;   1   ?)
% 0.51/0.58  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.51/0.58  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.51/0.58  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.58  fof(dt_k1_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.51/0.58      $true ).
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  fof(dt_k2_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.51/0.58      $true ).
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  fof(dt_k9_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.51/0.58      $true ).
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  fof(fc13_finset_1,axiom,
% 0.51/0.58      ! [A,B] :
% 0.51/0.58        ( ( relation(A)
% 0.51/0.58          & function(A)
% 0.51/0.58          & finite(B) )
% 0.51/0.58       => finite(relation_image(A,B)) ) ).
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  fof(rc1_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.51/0.58      ? [A] :
% 0.51/0.58        ( relation(A)
% 0.51/0.58        & function(A) ) ).
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  fof(t146_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.51/0.58      ! [A] :
% 0.51/0.58        ( relation(A)
% 0.51/0.58       => relation_image(A,relation_dom(A)) = relation_rng(A) ) ).
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  fof(t17_finset_1,axiom,
% 0.51/0.58      ! [A,B] :
% 0.51/0.58        ( ( relation(B)
% 0.51/0.58          & function(B) )
% 0.51/0.58       => ( finite(A)
% 0.51/0.58         => finite(relation_image(B,A)) ) ) ).
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  fof(t26_finset_1,conjecture,
% 0.51/0.58      ! [A] :
% 0.51/0.58        ( ( relation(A)
% 0.51/0.58          & function(A) )
% 0.51/0.58       => ( finite(relation_dom(A))
% 0.51/0.58         => finite(relation_rng(A)) ) ) ).
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.51/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.51/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.51/0.58  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:10)
% 0.51/0.58  %VarNum:9(SingletonVarNum:3)
% 0.51/0.58  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.51/0.58  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.51/0.58  %SharedTerms:10
% 0.51/0.58  %goalClause: 12 14 15 16
% 0.51/0.58  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.51/0.58  [11]P1(a1)
% 0.51/0.58  [12]P1(a2)
% 0.51/0.58  [13]P2(a1)
% 0.51/0.58  [14]P2(a2)
% 0.51/0.58  [15]P3(f3(a2))
% 0.51/0.58  [16]~P3(f4(a2))
% 0.51/0.58  [17]~P1(x171)+E(f5(x171,f3(x171)),f4(x171))
% 0.51/0.58  [19]~P1(x191)+~P2(x191)+~P3(x192)+P3(f5(x191,x192))
% 0.51/0.58  %EqnAxiom
% 0.51/0.58  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.51/0.58  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.51/0.58  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.51/0.58  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41),f3(x42))
% 0.51/0.58  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f4(x51),f4(x52))
% 0.51/0.58  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f5(x61,x63),f5(x62,x63))
% 0.51/0.58  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f5(x73,x71),f5(x73,x72))
% 0.51/0.58  [8]~P1(x81)+P1(x82)+~E(x81,x82)
% 0.51/0.58  [9]~P3(x91)+P3(x92)+~E(x91,x92)
% 0.51/0.58  [10]~P2(x101)+P2(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.51/0.59  cnf(20,plain,
% 0.51/0.59     (E(f4(a2),f5(a2,f3(a2)))),
% 0.51/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[12,2,17])).
% 0.51/0.59  cnf(23,plain,
% 0.51/0.59     ($false),
% 0.51/0.59     inference(scs_inference,[],[14,15,16,12,20,2,9,19]),
% 0.51/0.59     ['proof']).
% 0.51/0.59  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.51/0.59  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------