↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU303+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  13   ~;   7   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn   5   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t146_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => relation_image(A,relation_dom(A)) = relation_rng(A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t146_relat_1) ).

fof(t17_finset_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( function(B)
        & relation(B) )
     => ( finite(A)
       => finite(relation_image(B,A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t17_finset_1) ).

fof(t26_finset_1,conjecture,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( function(A)
        & relation(A) )
     => ( finite(relation_dom(A))
       => finite(relation_rng(A)) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t26_finset_1) ).

fof(t26_finset_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( ( function(A)
          & relation(A) )
       => ( finite(relation_dom(A))
         => finite(relation_rng(A)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t26_finset_1]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( relation_rng(A) = relation_image(A,relation_dom(A))
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t146_relat_1]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( finite(relation_image(A,B))
    | ~ finite(B)
    | ~ function(A)
    | ~ relation(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t17_finset_1]) ).

fof(nnf_8,plain,
    ? [A] :
      ( ~ finite(relation_rng(A))
      & finite(relation_dom(A))
      & function(A)
      & relation(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t26_finset_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t26_finset_1_neg,plain,
    ( ~ finite(relation_rng(sK0))
    & finite(relation_dom(sK0))
    & function(sK0)
    & relation(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(A,sK0)],[nnf_8]) ).

cnf(c_13,negated_conjecture,
    relation(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t26_finset_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_14,negated_conjecture,
    relation_rng(sK0) = relation_image(sK0,relation_dom(sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( finite(relation_image(sK0,A))
    | ~ finite(A)
    | ~ function(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(relation_rng(sK0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t26_finset_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(relation_image(sK0,relation_dom(sK0))),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    finite(relation_dom(sK0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t26_finset_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    function(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t26_finset_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( finite(relation_image(sK0,relation_dom(sK0)))
    | ~ function(sK0) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ function(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_21]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU303+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 09:04:03 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 334059 was started by sandbox on n017,
% 0.09/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 09:04:03 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.39  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.13/0.39  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.13/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 8.000.
% 0.13/0.39  % Given clauses 6.
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------