↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : SEU303+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:41:03 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.37s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (  23   ~;  18   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   0 sgn  11   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t26_finset_1,conjecture,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( relation(A)
        & function(A) )
     => ( finite(relation_dom(A))
       => finite(relation_rng(A)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t26_finset_1) ).

fof(c6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( ( relation(A)
          & function(A) )
       => ( finite(relation_dom(A))
         => finite(relation_rng(A)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t26_finset_1]) ).

fof(c7,negated_conjecture,
    ? [A] :
      ( relation(A)
      & function(A)
      & finite(relation_dom(A))
      & ~ finite(relation_rng(A)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c6]) ).

fof(c8,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X2] :
      ( relation(X2)
      & function(X2)
      & finite(relation_dom(X2))
      & ~ finite(relation_rng(X2)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c7]) ).

fof(c9,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation(skolem0001)
    & function(skolem0001)
    & finite(relation_dom(skolem0001))
    & ~ finite(relation_rng(skolem0001)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c8]) ).

cnf(c13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(relation_rng(skolem0001)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c9]) ).

cnf(c10,negated_conjecture,
    relation(skolem0001),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c9]) ).

cnf(c11,negated_conjecture,
    function(skolem0001),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c9]) ).

cnf(c12,negated_conjecture,
    finite(relation_dom(skolem0001)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c9]) ).

fof(t17_finset_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( relation(B)
        & function(B) )
     => ( finite(A)
       => finite(relation_image(B,A)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_finset_1) ).

fof(c14,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ relation(B)
      | ~ function(B)
      | ~ finite(A)
      | finite(relation_image(B,A)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t17_finset_1]) ).

fof(c15,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ relation(X4)
      | ~ function(X4)
      | ~ finite(X3)
      | finite(relation_image(X4,X3)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c14]) ).

cnf(c16,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X42)
    | ~ function(X42)
    | ~ finite(X43)
    | finite(relation_image(X42,X43)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c15]) ).

cnf(c43,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X51)
    | ~ function(X51)
    | finite(relation_image(X51,relation_dom(skolem0001))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c16,c12]) ).

cnf(c85,plain,
    ( ~ relation(skolem0001)
    | finite(relation_image(skolem0001,relation_dom(skolem0001))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c43,c11]) ).

cnf(c87,plain,
    finite(relation_image(skolem0001,relation_dom(skolem0001))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c85,c10]) ).

cnf(c3,axiom,
    ( X20 != X19
    | ~ finite(X20)
    | finite(X19) ),
    theory(equality) ).

fof(t146_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => relation_image(A,relation_dom(A)) = relation_rng(A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t146_relat_1) ).

fof(c17,plain,
    ! [A] :
      ( ~ relation(A)
      | relation_image(A,relation_dom(A)) = relation_rng(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t146_relat_1]) ).

fof(c18,plain,
    ! [X5] :
      ( ~ relation(X5)
      | relation_image(X5,relation_dom(X5)) = relation_rng(X5) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c17]) ).

cnf(c19,plain,
    ( ~ relation(X38)
    | relation_image(X38,relation_dom(X38)) = relation_rng(X38) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c18]) ).

cnf(c40,plain,
    relation_image(skolem0001,relation_dom(skolem0001)) = relation_rng(skolem0001),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19,c10]) ).

cnf(c49,plain,
    ( ~ finite(relation_image(skolem0001,relation_dom(skolem0001)))
    | finite(relation_rng(skolem0001)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c40,c3]) ).

cnf(c96,plain,
    finite(relation_rng(skolem0001)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c49,c87]) ).

cnf(c108,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c96,c13]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU303+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed May  8 10:58:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/0.55  % Version:  1.5
% 0.37/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.55  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.55  
% 0.37/0.55  % Initial clauses    : 21
% 0.37/0.55  % Processed clauses  : 34
% 0.37/0.55  % Factors computed   : 2
% 0.37/0.55  % Resolvents computed: 78
% 0.37/0.55  % Tautologies deleted: 5
% 0.37/0.55  % Forward subsumed   : 10
% 0.37/0.55  % Backward subsumed  : 3
% 0.37/0.55  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.37/0.55  % User time          : 0.190 s
% 0.37/0.55  % System time        : 0.010 s
% 0.37/0.55  % Total time         : 0.200 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------