↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU305+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:28:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 25.75s 9.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 25.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  129 (  25 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  143 (  46   ~;  38   |;  35   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  22  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t26_lattices,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & join_commutative(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
             => ( ( below(X1,X3,X2)
                  & below(X1,X2,X3) )
               => X2 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t26_lattices) ).

fof(redefinition_k3_lattices,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
        & element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
        & join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & join_commutative(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k3_lattices) ).

fof(d3_lattices,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
             => ( below(X1,X2,X3)
              <=> join(X1,X2,X3) = X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_lattices) ).

fof(commutativity_k3_lattices,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
        & element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
        & join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & join_commutative(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join_commut(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_lattices) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( join_semilatt_str(X1)
          & join_commutative(X1)
          & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
           => ! [X3] :
                ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
               => ( ( below(X1,X3,X2)
                    & below(X1,X2,X3) )
                 => X2 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t26_lattices]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
        & element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
        & join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & join_commutative(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k3_lattices]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( join_semilatt_str(X1)
          & join_commutative(X1)
          & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
           => ! [X3] :
                ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
               => ( ( below(X1,X3,X2)
                    & below(X1,X2,X3) )
                 => X2 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
             => ( below(X1,X2,X3)
              <=> join(X1,X2,X3) = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d3_lattices]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
        & element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
        & join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & join_commutative(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join_commut(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_lattices]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X710,X711,X712] :
      ( join_commut(X710,X711,X712) = join(X710,X711,X712)
      | ~ element(X712,the_carrier(X710))
      | ~ element(X711,the_carrier(X710))
      | ~ join_semilatt_str(X710)
      | ~ join_commutative(X710)
      | empty_carrier(X710) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk291_0 != esk292_0
    & below(esk290_0,esk292_0,esk291_0)
    & below(esk290_0,esk291_0,esk292_0)
    & element(esk292_0,the_carrier(esk290_0))
    & element(esk291_0,the_carrier(esk290_0))
    & join_semilatt_str(esk290_0)
    & join_commutative(esk290_0)
    & ~ empty_carrier(esk290_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X298,X299,X300] :
      ( ( ~ join_semilatt_str(X298)
        | empty_carrier(X298)
        | ~ element(X299,the_carrier(X298))
        | ~ element(X300,the_carrier(X298))
        | below(X298,X299,X300)
        | join(X298,X299,X300) != X300 )
      & ( ~ join_semilatt_str(X298)
        | empty_carrier(X298)
        | ~ element(X299,the_carrier(X298))
        | ~ element(X300,the_carrier(X298))
        | join(X298,X299,X300) = X300
        | ~ below(X298,X299,X300) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X47,X48,X49] :
      ( join_commut(X47,X48,X49) = join_commut(X47,X49,X48)
      | ~ element(X49,the_carrier(X47))
      | ~ element(X48,the_carrier(X47))
      | ~ join_semilatt_str(X47)
      | ~ join_commutative(X47)
      | empty_carrier(X47) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
    | ~ join_commutative(X1)
    | join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join(X1,X2,X3)
    | empty_carrier(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk292_0,the_carrier(esk290_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    join_semilatt_str(esk290_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    join_commutative(esk290_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ empty_carrier(esk290_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ below(X1,X2,X3)
    | empty_carrier(X1)
    | join(X1,X2,X3) = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    below(esk290_0,esk291_0,esk292_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk291_0,the_carrier(esk290_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    below(esk290_0,esk292_0,esk291_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
    | ~ join_commutative(X1)
    | join_commut(X1,X2,X3) = join_commut(X1,X3,X2)
    | empty_carrier(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk290_0))
    | join_commut(esk290_0,X1,esk292_0) = join(esk290_0,X1,esk292_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk290_0,esk291_0,esk292_0) = esk292_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_15]),c_0_14]),c_0_20])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk290_0))
    | join_commut(esk290_0,X1,esk291_0) = join(esk290_0,X1,esk291_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    join(esk290_0,esk292_0,esk291_0) = esk291_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_21]),c_0_15]),c_0_20]),c_0_14])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(X1,the_carrier(esk290_0))
    | join_commut(esk290_0,X1,esk292_0) = join_commut(esk290_0,esk292_0,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    join_commut(esk290_0,esk291_0,esk292_0) = esk292_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_20]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    join_commut(esk290_0,esk292_0,esk291_0) = esk291_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_14]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    esk291_0 != esk292_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_20]),c_0_28]),c_0_29]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU305+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.37  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:10:04 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 25.75/9.24  % Version: 3.5.1
% 25.75/9.24  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 25.75/9.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2159959 completed with status 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 25.75/9.24  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 25.75/9.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 25.75/9.24  % No SInE strategy applied
% 25.75/9.24  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 25.75/9.24  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 113s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 113s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 2159970 completed with status 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Result found by G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 25.75/9.24  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 25.75/9.24  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 25.75/9.24  % No SInE strategy applied
% 25.75/9.24  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 25.75/9.24  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 113s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 113s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 25.75/9.24  % Preprocessing time       : 0.038 s
% 25.75/9.24  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 25.75/9.24  
% 25.75/9.24  % Proof found!
% 25.75/9.24  % SZS status Theorem
% 25.75/9.24  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 25.75/9.24  % Parsed axioms                        : 454
% 25.75/9.24  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Initial clauses                      : 1784
% 25.75/9.24  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 40
% 25.75/9.24  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1744
% 25.75/9.24  % Processed clauses                    : 4659
% 25.75/9.24  % ...of these trivial                  : 42
% 25.75/9.24  % ...subsumed                          : 617
% 25.75/9.24  % ...remaining for further processing  : 4000
% 25.75/9.24  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 639
% 25.75/9.24  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Backward-subsumed                    : 20
% 25.75/9.24  % Backward-rewritten                   : 53
% 25.75/9.24  % Generated clauses                    : 73327
% 25.75/9.24  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 72128
% 25.75/9.24  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 196
% 25.75/9.24  % Paramodulations                      : 72795
% 25.75/9.24  % Factorizations                       : 14
% 25.75/9.24  % NegExts                              : 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Equation resolutions                 : 646
% 25.75/9.24  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3277
% 25.75/9.24  % ...of those cached                   : 2863
% 25.75/9.24  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 25.75/9.24  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 25.75/9.24  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 25.75/9.24  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 25.75/9.24  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 25.75/9.24  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 25.75/9.24  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 25.75/9.24  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 25.75/9.24  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 25.75/9.24  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 25.75/9.24  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 25.75/9.24  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 25.75/9.24  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1942
% 25.75/9.24  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 209
% 25.75/9.24  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 25.75/9.24  %    Negative unit clauses             : 56
% 25.75/9.24  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1674
% 25.75/9.24  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70671
% 25.75/9.24  % ...number of literals in the above   : 465352
% 25.75/9.24  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1694
% 25.75/9.24  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2250625
% 25.75/9.24  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 229028
% 25.75/9.24  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 573
% 25.75/9.24  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48382
% 25.75/9.24  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 25.75/9.24  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 92
% 25.75/9.24  % BW rewrite match successes           : 51
% 25.75/9.24  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 25.75/9.24  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2219451
% 25.75/9.24  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 25041
% 25.75/9.24  
% 25.75/9.24  % -------------------------------------------------
% 25.75/9.24  % User time                : 3.616 s
% 25.75/9.24  % System time              : 0.090 s
% 25.75/9.24  % Total time               : 3.706 s
% 25.75/9.24  % Maximum resident set size: 8588 pages
% 25.75/9.24  
% 25.75/9.24  % -------------------------------------------------
% 25.75/9.24  % User time                : 17.572 s
% 25.75/9.24  % System time              : 0.528 s
% 25.75/9.24  % Total time               : 18.100 s
% 25.75/9.24  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 25.75/9.24  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------