↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SEU308+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:45:46 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  13   ~;   6   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   1 sgn  14   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(reflexivity_r1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : subset(A,A),
    file('theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

fof(redefinition_k6_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( element(C,powerset(A))
        & element(B,powerset(A)) )
     => subset_difference(A,B,C) = set_difference(B,C) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k6_subset_1) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( element(A,powerset(B))
    <=> subset(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).

fof(d3_pre_topc,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( one_sorted_str(A)
     => cast_as_carrier_subset(A) = the_carrier(A) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d3_pre_topc) ).

fof(d5_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( element(B,powerset(A))
     => subset_complement(A,B) = set_difference(A,B) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d5_subset_1) ).

fof(t17_pre_topc,conjecture,
    ! [A] :
      ( one_sorted_str(A)
     => ! [B] :
          ( element(B,powerset(the_carrier(A)))
         => subset_complement(the_carrier(A),B) = subset_difference(the_carrier(A),cast_as_carrier_subset(A),B) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t17_pre_topc) ).

fof(t17_pre_topc_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A] :
        ( one_sorted_str(A)
       => ! [B] :
            ( element(B,powerset(the_carrier(A)))
           => subset_complement(the_carrier(A),B) = subset_difference(the_carrier(A),cast_as_carrier_subset(A),B) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t17_pre_topc]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    ( ~ subset(A,B)
    | element(A,powerset(B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[t3_subset]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    subset(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[reflexivity_r1_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    ( the_carrier(A) = cast_as_carrier_subset(A)
    | ~ one_sorted_str(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d3_pre_topc]) ).

fof(nnf_53,plain,
    ? [A] :
      ( ? [B] :
          ( subset_difference(the_carrier(A),cast_as_carrier_subset(A),B) != subset_complement(the_carrier(A),B)
          & element(B,powerset(the_carrier(A))) )
      & one_sorted_str(A) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t17_pre_topc_neg]) ).

fof(sk_t17_pre_topc_neg,plain,
    ( subset_difference(the_carrier(sK0),cast_as_carrier_subset(sK0),sK1) != subset_complement(the_carrier(sK0),sK1)
    & element(sK1,powerset(the_carrier(sK0)))
    & one_sorted_str(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1)],[nnf_53]) ).

cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
    one_sorted_str(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t17_pre_topc_neg]) ).

cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    the_carrier(sK0) = cast_as_carrier_subset(sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_59]) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    cast_as_carrier_subset(sK0) = the_carrier(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_62]) ).

cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    subset_difference(the_carrier(sK0),cast_as_carrier_subset(sK0),sK1) != subset_complement(the_carrier(sK0),sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t17_pre_topc_neg]) ).

cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    subset_difference(the_carrier(sK0),the_carrier(sK0),sK1) != subset_complement(the_carrier(sK0),sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_68]) ).

cnf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    element(sK1,powerset(the_carrier(sK0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_t17_pre_topc_neg]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ( subset_complement(B,A) = set_difference(B,A)
    | ~ element(A,powerset(B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d5_subset_1]) ).

cnf(c_75,plain,
    ( subset_difference(B,A,C) = set_difference(A,C)
    | ~ element(C,powerset(B))
    | ~ element(A,powerset(B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k6_subset_1]) ).

cnf(c_143,plain,
    element(A,powerset(A)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_147,plain,
    subset_complement(the_carrier(sK0),sK1) = set_difference(the_carrier(sK0),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_70]) ).

cnf(c_148,negated_conjecture,
    subset_difference(the_carrier(sK0),the_carrier(sK0),sK1) != set_difference(the_carrier(sK0),sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_147,c_69]) ).

cnf(c_283,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset_difference(the_carrier(sK0),A,sK1) = set_difference(A,sK1)
    | ~ element(A,powerset(the_carrier(sK0))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_70]) ).

cnf(c_284,negated_conjecture,
    ~ element(the_carrier(sK0),powerset(the_carrier(sK0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_283,c_148]) ).

cnf(c_282,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_143,c_284]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU308+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 09:10:09 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.37  % Process 3274345 was started by sandbox2 on n008,
% 0.10/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 09:10:09 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.40  
% 0.10/0.40  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.16/0.43  % Length of proof is 21.
% 0.16/0.43  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.16/0.43  % Maximum clause weight is 26.000.
% 0.16/0.43  % Given clauses 91.
% 0.16/0.43  
% 0.16/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------