↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU319+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 10.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   66 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  30   ~;  28   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t29_tops_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( top_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
         => ( closed_subset(X2,X1)
          <=> open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),X2),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t29_tops_1) ).

fof(d6_pre_topc,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( top_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
         => ( closed_subset(X2,X1)
          <=> open_subset(subset_difference(the_carrier(X1),cast_as_carrier_subset(X1),X2),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d6_pre_topc) ).

fof(t17_pre_topc,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( one_sorted_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
         => subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),X2) = subset_difference(the_carrier(X1),cast_as_carrier_subset(X1),X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_pre_topc) ).

fof(dt_l1_pre_topc,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( top_str(X1)
     => one_sorted_str(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_l1_pre_topc) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( top_str(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
           => ( closed_subset(X2,X1)
            <=> open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),X2),X1) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t29_tops_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X6,X7] :
      ( ( ~ top_str(X6)
        | ~ element(X7,powerset(the_carrier(X6)))
        | closed_subset(X7,X6)
        | ~ open_subset(subset_difference(the_carrier(X6),cast_as_carrier_subset(X6),X7),X6) )
      & ( ~ top_str(X6)
        | ~ element(X7,powerset(the_carrier(X6)))
        | open_subset(subset_difference(the_carrier(X6),cast_as_carrier_subset(X6),X7),X6)
        | ~ closed_subset(X7,X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d6_pre_topc])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( subset_complement(the_carrier(X12),X13) = subset_difference(the_carrier(X12),cast_as_carrier_subset(X12),X13)
      | ~ element(X13,powerset(the_carrier(X12)))
      | ~ one_sorted_str(X12) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t17_pre_topc])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X17] :
      ( one_sorted_str(X17)
      | ~ top_str(X17) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_l1_pre_topc])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0)
      | closed_subset(esk2_0,esk1_0) )
    & ( ~ open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0)
      | ~ closed_subset(esk2_0,esk1_0) )
    & element(esk2_0,powerset(the_carrier(esk1_0)))
    & top_str(esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ top_str(X2)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(the_carrier(X2)))
    | ~ closed_subset(X1,X2)
    | open_subset(subset_difference(the_carrier(X2),cast_as_carrier_subset(X2),X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
    | ~ one_sorted_str(X1)
    | subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),X2) = subset_difference(the_carrier(X1),cast_as_carrier_subset(X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ top_str(X1)
    | one_sorted_str(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0)
    | ~ closed_subset(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ top_str(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
    | ~ closed_subset(X2,X1)
    | open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),X2),X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk2_0,powerset(the_carrier(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    top_str(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ top_str(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
    | ~ open_subset(subset_difference(the_carrier(X1),cast_as_carrier_subset(X1),X2),X1)
    | closed_subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0)
    | closed_subset(esk2_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ closed_subset(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ top_str(X2)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(the_carrier(X2)))
    | ~ open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(X2),X1),X2)
    | closed_subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(esk1_0),esk2_0),esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_18]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU319+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/10.46  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/10.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/10.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/10.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/10.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/10.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/10.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/10.46  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:14:13 UTC 2026
% 0.14/10.46  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/10.46  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/10.53  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/10.53  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/10.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/10.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/10.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % new_bool_3 with pid 2602291 completed with status 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/10.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/10.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/10.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/10.56  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/10.56  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/10.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2602294 completed with status 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/10.56  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/10.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/10.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/10.56  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/10.56  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/10.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/10.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/10.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.20/10.56  
% 0.20/10.56  % Proof found!
% 0.20/10.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/10.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/10.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 0.20/10.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8
% 0.20/10.56  % Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.20/10.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.20/10.56  % Processed clauses                    : 19
% 0.20/10.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 19
% 0.20/10.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.20/10.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Generated clauses                    : 12
% 0.20/10.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.20/10.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.20/10.56  % Paramodulations                      : 11
% 0.20/10.56  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.20/10.56  % ...of those cached                   : 2
% 0.20/10.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/10.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/10.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/10.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/10.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/10.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/10.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/10.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/10.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/10.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/10.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/10.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/10.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 17
% 0.20/10.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.20/10.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/10.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.20/10.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 10
% 0.20/10.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.20/10.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 9
% 0.20/10.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.20/10.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19
% 0.20/10.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.20/10.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.20/10.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/10.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/10.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1357
% 0.20/10.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 223
% 0.20/10.56  
% 0.20/10.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/10.56  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.20/10.56  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/10.56  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.20/10.56  % Maximum resident set size: 3900 pages
% 0.20/10.56  
% 0.20/10.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/10.56  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.20/10.56  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.20/10.56  % Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.20/10.56  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.20/10.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------