↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : SEU319+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:38:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.96s 3.11s
% Output   : Refutation 4.28s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   73 (   6 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  270 (   2   ~;   0   |;   7   &; 225   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  32  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0   ^;  47   !;   6   ?;  53   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(top_str_decl,type,
    top_str: $i > $o ).

thf(element_decl,type,
    element: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(powerset_decl,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

thf(the_carrier_decl,type,
    the_carrier: $i > $i ).

thf(closed_subset_decl,type,
    closed_subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(open_subset_decl,type,
    open_subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(subset_complement_decl,type,
    subset_complement: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(one_sorted_str_decl,type,
    one_sorted_str: $i > $o ).

thf(subset_decl,type,
    subset: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(subset_difference_decl,type,
    subset_difference: $i > $i > $i > $i ).

thf(set_difference_decl,type,
    set_difference: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(cast_as_carrier_subset_decl,type,
    cast_as_carrier_subset: $i > $i ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ one_sorted_str ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_l1_struct_0) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ one_sorted_str ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
        = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',involutiveness_k3_subset_1) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
        = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ top_str )
     => ( A @ one_sorted_str ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_l1_pre_topc) ).

thf(57,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ top_str )
     => ( A @ one_sorted_str ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ top_str )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
         => ( ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
          <=> ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ cast_as_carrier_subset @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_difference ) ) @ open_subset ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d6_pre_topc) ).

thf(41,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ top_str )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
         => ( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ cast_as_carrier_subset @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_difference ) ) @ open_subset ) )
             => ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) ) )
            & ( ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
             => ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ cast_as_carrier_subset @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_difference ) ) @ open_subset ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
     => ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ element ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k3_subset_1) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
     => ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ element ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ one_sorted_str )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
         => ( ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
            = ( B @ ( A @ cast_as_carrier_subset @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_difference ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_pre_topc) ).

thf(49,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ one_sorted_str )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
         => ( ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
            = ( B @ ( A @ cast_as_carrier_subset @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_difference ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ top_str )
     => ! [B: $i] :
          ( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
         => ( ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
          <=> ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t29_tops_1) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ top_str )
       => ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
           => ( ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
            <=> ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( A @ top_str )
       => ! [B: $i] :
            ( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
           => ( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
               => ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) ) )
              & ( ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
               => ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ one_sorted_str )
     => ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( A @ cast_as_carrier_subset @ element ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_pre_topc) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ one_sorted_str )
     => ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( A @ cast_as_carrier_subset @ element ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ top_str ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_l1_pre_topc) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ? [A: $i] : ( A @ top_str ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) )
        & ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
     => ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_difference ) ) )
        = ( C @ ( B @ set_difference ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k6_subset_1) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) )
        & ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
     => ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_difference ) ) )
        = ( C @ ( B @ set_difference ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_r1_tarski) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i] : ( A @ ( A @ subset ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1) ).

thf(55,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
    ? [B: $i] : ( A @ ( B @ element ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) )
        & ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
     => ( A @ powerset @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_difference ) ) @ element ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_subset_1) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ powerset @ ( C @ element ) )
        & ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
     => ( A @ powerset @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_difference ) ) @ element ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) )
    <=> ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ subset ) )
       => ( B @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ subset ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(59,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[24,52,57,41,45,49,16,47,28,38,26,55,36,30]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU319+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.16/0.95  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.95  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.95  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.95  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.95  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.95  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.95  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.95  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 09:11:55 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.95  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.95  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.95/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.27/1.74  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (190ms). 
% 1.27/1.76  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.01/2.17  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.01/2.18  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.14/2.28  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 18 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.32/2.35  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 13 axioms (removed 5 axioms). 
% 2.32/2.38  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.32/2.39  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.32/2.40  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.96/3.10  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.96/3.11  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.96/3.11  % Time passed: 2001ms (effective reasoning time: 1343ms)
% 3.96/3.11  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.96/3.11  % Axioms used in derivation (13): d6_pre_topc, involutiveness_k3_subset_1, t17_pre_topc, dt_l1_pre_topc, dt_k6_subset_1, t3_subset, existence_m1_subset_1, existence_l1_pre_topc, reflexivity_r1_tarski, existence_l1_struct_0, redefinition_k6_subset_1, dt_k3_subset_1, dt_k2_pre_topc
% 3.96/3.11  % No. of inferences in proof: 30
% 3.96/3.11  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2001 ms resp. 1343 ms w/o parsing
% 4.28/3.17  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.28/3.17  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------