%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SEU320+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:38:26 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 34.16s 13.95s
% Output : Refutation 34.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 20
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 49 ( 11 unt; 0 typ; 2 def)
% Number of atoms : 184 ( 29 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 761 ( 91 ~; 75 |; 10 &; 557 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 25 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 12 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 0 ^; 54 !; 0 ?; 56 :)
% ( 0 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 2 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(top_str_decl,type,
top_str: $i > $o ).
thf(element_decl,type,
element: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(powerset_decl,type,
powerset: $i > $i ).
thf(the_carrier_decl,type,
the_carrier: $i > $i ).
thf(open_subset_decl,type,
open_subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(closed_subset_decl,type,
closed_subset: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(subset_complement_decl,type,
subset_complement: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk1_decl,type,
sk1: $i ).
thf(sk2_decl,type,
sk2: $i ).
thf(sk1_def,definition,
( sk1
= ( @+[A: $i] :
~ ( ( A @ top_str )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ open_subset ) ) )
& ( ( A @ ( B @ open_subset ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(sk2_def,definition,
( sk2
= ( @+[A: $i] :
~ ( ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) )
=> ( ( ( sk1 @ ( A @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
=> ( sk1 @ ( A @ open_subset ) ) )
& ( ( sk1 @ ( A @ open_subset ) )
=> ( sk1 @ ( A @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ top_str )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( A @ ( B @ open_subset ) )
<=> ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t30_tops_1) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ top_str )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( A @ ( B @ open_subset ) )
<=> ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(16,plain,
~ ! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ top_str )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ open_subset ) ) )
& ( ( A @ ( B @ open_subset ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(17,plain,
( ( ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) )
& ( ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) )
& ( ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) )
| ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) ) )
& ( ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) ) )
& ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ element ) )
& ( sk1 @ top_str ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[16]) ).
thf(22,plain,
( ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(19,plain,
sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ element ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ element ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k3_subset_1) ).
thf(25,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ element ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(26,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ element ) )
| ~ ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[25]) ).
thf(95,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ element ) )
!= ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
| ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ element ) )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[19,26]) ).
thf(96,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ element ) )
!= ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
| ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ element ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[95]) ).
thf(97,plain,
sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ element ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[96:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 @ the_carrier )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ top_str )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
<=> ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t29_tops_1) ).
thf(43,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ top_str )
=> ! [B: $i] :
( ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) ) )
& ( ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
=> ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(44,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
| ~ ( A @ top_str ) )
& ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
| ~ ( A @ top_str ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[43]) ).
thf(45,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
| ~ ( A @ top_str ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
thf(21,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(59,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
!= ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
| ~ ( A @ top_str ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[45,21]) ).
thf(60,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
!= ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
| ~ ( A @ top_str ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[59]) ).
thf(64,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A != sk1 )
| ( ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
!= sk2 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
| ~ ( A @ top_str ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[60]) ).
thf(65,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
!= sk2 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ top_str ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
thf(23,plain,
sk1 @ top_str,
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(164,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
!= sk2 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) )
| ~ $true ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[65,23]) ).
thf(165,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
!= sk2 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[164]) ).
thf(169,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ element ) )
!= ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) ) )
| ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
!= sk2 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ $true ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[97,165]) ).
thf(170,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ element ) )
!= ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( A @ element ) ) )
| ( ( A @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
!= sk2 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( A @ closed_subset ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[169]) ).
thf(171,plain,
( ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
!= sk2 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[170:[bind(A,$thf( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) ))]]) ).
thf(199,plain,
( ( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
!= sk2 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[171]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',involutiveness_k3_subset_1) ).
thf(38,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(39,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= B )
| ~ ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[38]) ).
thf(40,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ~ ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
| ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= B ) ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[39]) ).
thf(273,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ element ) )
!= ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
| ~ $true
| ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= B ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[19,40]) ).
thf(274,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ element ) )
!= ( A @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
| ( ( B @ ( A @ subset_complement ) @ ( A @ subset_complement ) )
= B ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[273]) ).
thf(275,plain,
( ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) )
= sk2 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[274:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 @ the_carrier )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 ))]]) ).
thf(561,plain,
( ( sk2 != sk2 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[199,275]) ).
thf(562,plain,
~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[561]) ).
thf(563,plain,
( $false
| ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) ) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[22,562]) ).
thf(564,plain,
sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[563]) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) )
| ~ ( A @ top_str ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
thf(371,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ element ) )
!= ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
| ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( A @ top_str ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[97,46]) ).
thf(372,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] :
( ( ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ element ) )
!= ( A @ the_carrier @ powerset @ ( B @ element ) ) )
| ( A @ ( B @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ ( B @ ( A @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
| ~ ( A @ top_str ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[371]) ).
thf(373,plain,
( ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ closed_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) @ open_subset ) )
| ~ ( sk1 @ top_str ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[372:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 )),bind(B,$thf( sk2 @ ( sk1 @ the_carrier @ subset_complement ) ))]]) ).
thf(8606,plain,
( $false
| ~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) )
| ~ $true ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[373,562,275,23]) ).
thf(8607,plain,
~ ( sk1 @ ( sk2 @ open_subset ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8606]) ).
thf(8608,plain,
$false,
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[564,8607]) ).
thf(8609,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8608]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU320+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/5.41 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.14/5.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/5.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/5.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/5.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/5.41 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/5.41 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/5.41 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 09:17:48 UTC 2026
% 0.14/5.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/5.41 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.18/5.74 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.18/5.84 % [INFO] Parsing done (94ms).
% 0.18/5.84 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.38/6.03 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.38/6.04 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.38/6.08 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 13 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.38/6.10 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 13 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 1.38/6.12 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 1.38/6.12 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 1.38/6.12 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 34.16/13.94 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 34.16/13.95 % Time passed: 8415ms (effective reasoning time: 8099ms)
% 34.16/13.95 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 34.16/13.95 % Axioms used in derivation (3): dt_k3_subset_1, t29_tops_1, involutiveness_k3_subset_1
% 34.16/13.95 % No. of inferences in proof: 47
% 34.16/13.95 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 8415 ms resp. 8099 ms w/o parsing
% 34.16/14.01 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 34.16/14.01 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------