↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU323+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:42 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 33.18s 6.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 33.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   87 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (  37   ~;  30   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   2 sgn  32   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t51_tops_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( top_str(X1)
        & topological_space(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
         => open_subset(interior(X1,X2),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t51_tops_1) ).

fof(d1_tops_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( top_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
         => interior(X1,X2) = subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),topstr_closure(X1,subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),X2))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tops_1) ).

fof(t29_tops_1,lemma,
    ! [X1] :
      ( top_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
         => ( closed_subset(X2,X1)
          <=> open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),X2),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t29_tops_1) ).

fof(fc2_tops_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
        & top_str(X1)
        & topological_space(X1) )
     => closed_subset(topstr_closure(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc2_tops_1) ).

fof(dt_k6_pre_topc,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
        & top_str(X1) )
     => element(topstr_closure(X1,X2),powerset(the_carrier(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_pre_topc) ).

fof(t3_subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    <=> subset(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_subset) ).

fof(t36_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t36_xboole_1) ).

fof(d5_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
     => subset_complement(X1,X2) = set_difference(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_subset_1) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( top_str(X1)
          & topological_space(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
           => open_subset(interior(X1,X2),X1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t51_tops_1]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ open_subset(interior(esk333_0,esk334_0),esk333_0)
    & element(esk334_0,powerset(the_carrier(esk333_0)))
    & top_str(esk333_0)
    & topological_space(esk333_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X252,X253] :
      ( interior(X252,X253) = subset_complement(the_carrier(X252),topstr_closure(X252,subset_complement(the_carrier(X252),X253)))
      | ~ element(X253,powerset(the_carrier(X252)))
      | ~ top_str(X252) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tops_1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ open_subset(interior(esk333_0,esk334_0),esk333_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
    | ~ top_str(X1)
    | interior(X1,X2) = subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),topstr_closure(X1,subset_complement(the_carrier(X1),X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    top_str(esk333_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk334_0,powerset(the_carrier(esk333_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_15,lemma,
    ! [X1413,X1414] :
      ( ( ~ top_str(X1413)
        | ~ element(X1414,powerset(the_carrier(X1413)))
        | closed_subset(X1414,X1413)
        | ~ open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(X1413),X1414),X1413) )
      & ( ~ top_str(X1413)
        | ~ element(X1414,powerset(the_carrier(X1413)))
        | open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(X1413),X1414),X1413)
        | ~ closed_subset(X1414,X1413) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t29_tops_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(esk333_0),topstr_closure(esk333_0,subset_complement(the_carrier(esk333_0),esk334_0))),esk333_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,lemma,
    ( ~ top_str(X2)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(the_carrier(X2)))
    | ~ closed_subset(X1,X2)
    | open_subset(subset_complement(the_carrier(X2),X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X654,X655] :
      ( closed_subset(topstr_closure(X654,X655),X654)
      | ~ element(X655,powerset(the_carrier(X654)))
      | ~ top_str(X654)
      | ~ topological_space(X654) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc2_tops_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
    ( ~ element(topstr_closure(esk333_0,subset_complement(the_carrier(esk333_0),esk334_0)),powerset(the_carrier(esk333_0)))
    | ~ closed_subset(topstr_closure(esk333_0,subset_complement(the_carrier(esk333_0),esk334_0)),esk333_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
    | ~ top_str(X1)
    | ~ topological_space(X1)
    | closed_subset(topstr_closure(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    topological_space(esk333_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X581,X582] :
      ( element(topstr_closure(X581,X582),powerset(the_carrier(X581)))
      | ~ element(X582,powerset(the_carrier(X581)))
      | ~ top_str(X581) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_pre_topc])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X1473,X1474] :
      ( ( element(X1473,powerset(X1474))
        | ~ subset(X1473,X1474) )
      & ( subset(X1473,X1474)
        | ~ element(X1473,powerset(X1474)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_subset])])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,lemma,
    ! [X1453,X1454] : subset(set_difference(X1453,X1454),X1453),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t36_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
    ( ~ element(subset_complement(the_carrier(esk333_0),esk334_0),powerset(the_carrier(esk333_0)))
    | ~ element(topstr_closure(esk333_0,subset_complement(the_carrier(esk333_0),esk334_0)),powerset(the_carrier(esk333_0))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ element(X2,powerset(the_carrier(X1)))
    | ~ top_str(X1)
    | element(topstr_closure(X1,X2),powerset(the_carrier(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X459,X460] :
      ( subset_complement(X459,X460) = set_difference(X459,X460)
      | ~ element(X460,powerset(X459)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_subset_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | element(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,lemma,
    subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,lemma,
    ~ element(subset_complement(the_carrier(esk333_0),esk334_0),powerset(the_carrier(esk333_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | subset_complement(X2,X1) = set_difference(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,lemma,
    element(set_difference(X1,X2),powerset(X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU323+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:09:35 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 33.18/6.17  % Version: 3.5.1
% 33.18/6.17  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 33.18/6.17  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 348611 completed with status 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 33.18/6.17  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 33.18/6.17  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 33.18/6.17  % No SInE strategy applied
% 33.18/6.17  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 33.18/6.17  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 68s (1) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 348621 completed with status 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 33.18/6.17  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 33.18/6.17  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 33.18/6.17  % No SInE strategy applied
% 33.18/6.17  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 33.18/6.17  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 91s (1) cores
% 33.18/6.17  % Preprocessing time       : 0.039 s
% 33.18/6.17  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 33.18/6.17  
% 33.18/6.17  % Proof found!
% 33.18/6.17  % SZS status Theorem
% 33.18/6.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 33.18/6.17  % Parsed axioms                        : 532
% 33.18/6.17  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Initial clauses                      : 2082
% 33.18/6.17  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 40
% 33.18/6.17  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 2042
% 33.18/6.17  % Processed clauses                    : 18525
% 33.18/6.17  % ...of these trivial                  : 83
% 33.18/6.17  % ...subsumed                          : 11101
% 33.18/6.17  % ...remaining for further processing  : 7341
% 33.18/6.17  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 742
% 33.18/6.17  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Backward-subsumed                    : 390
% 33.18/6.17  % Backward-rewritten                   : 71
% 33.18/6.17  % Generated clauses                    : 118775
% 33.18/6.17  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 112574
% 33.18/6.17  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 296
% 33.18/6.17  % Paramodulations                      : 118151
% 33.18/6.17  % Factorizations                       : 14
% 33.18/6.17  % NegExts                              : 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Equation resolutions                 : 748
% 33.18/6.17  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Total rewrite steps                  : 14942
% 33.18/6.17  % ...of those cached                   : 14356
% 33.18/6.17  % Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 33.18/6.17  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 33.18/6.17  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 33.18/6.17  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 33.18/6.17  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 33.18/6.17  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 33.18/6.17  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 33.18/6.17  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.066
% 33.18/6.17  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.087
% 33.18/6.17  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 33.18/6.17  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 33.18/6.17  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 33.18/6.17  % Current number of processed clauses  : 4594
% 33.18/6.17  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 208
% 33.18/6.17  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 33.18/6.17  %    Negative unit clauses             : 997
% 33.18/6.17  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3386
% 33.18/6.17  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 97142
% 33.18/6.17  % ...number of literals in the above   : 526760
% 33.18/6.17  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2360
% 33.18/6.17  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6140525
% 33.18/6.17  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1586663
% 33.18/6.17  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4950
% 33.18/6.17  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 239289
% 33.18/6.17  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 33.18/6.17  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 126
% 33.18/6.17  % BW rewrite match successes           : 85
% 33.18/6.17  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 33.18/6.17  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2510476
% 33.18/6.17  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 28811
% 33.18/6.17  
% 33.18/6.17  % -------------------------------------------------
% 33.18/6.17  % User time                : 5.165 s
% 33.18/6.17  % System time              : 0.123 s
% 33.18/6.17  % Total time               : 5.288 s
% 33.18/6.17  % Maximum resident set size: 9144 pages
% 33.18/6.17  
% 33.18/6.17  % -------------------------------------------------
% 33.18/6.17  % User time                : 15.858 s
% 33.18/6.17  % System time              : 0.400 s
% 33.18/6.17  % Total time               : 16.258 s
% 33.18/6.17  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 33.18/6.17  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------