↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU327+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:11:30 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.59s 1.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  22   ~;  16   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t47_setfam_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => ( X2 != empty_set
       => subset_difference(X1,cast_to_subset(X1),union_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = meet_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t47_setfam_1) ).

fof(d4_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : cast_to_subset(X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_subset_1) ).

fof(dt_k2_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : element(cast_to_subset(X1),powerset(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_subset_1) ).

fof(t11_tops_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => ( X2 != empty_set
       => meet_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = subset_complement(X1,union_of_subsets(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t11_tops_2) ).

fof(redefinition_k6_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
        & element(X3,powerset(X1)) )
     => subset_difference(X1,X2,X3) = set_difference(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k6_subset_1) ).

fof(dt_k5_setfam_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => element(union_of_subsets(X1,X2),powerset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_setfam_1) ).

fof(d5_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
     => subset_complement(X1,X2) = set_difference(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_subset_1) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X181,X182] :
      ( ~ element(X182,powerset(powerset(X181)))
      | X182 = empty_set
      | subset_difference(X181,cast_to_subset(X181),union_of_subsets(X181,X182)) = meet_of_subsets(X181,complements_of_subsets(X181,X182)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t47_setfam_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X127] : cast_to_subset(X127) = X127,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d4_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X130] : element(cast_to_subset(X130),powerset(X130)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
       => ( X2 != empty_set
         => meet_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = subset_complement(X1,union_of_subsets(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t11_tops_2]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X168,X169,X170] :
      ( ~ element(X169,powerset(X168))
      | ~ element(X170,powerset(X168))
      | subset_difference(X168,X169,X170) = set_difference(X169,X170) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k6_subset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | subset_difference(X2,cast_to_subset(X2),union_of_subsets(X2,X1)) = meet_of_subsets(X2,complements_of_subsets(X2,X1))
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(powerset(X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    cast_to_subset(X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    element(cast_to_subset(X1),powerset(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X133,X134] :
      ( ~ element(X134,powerset(powerset(X133)))
      | element(union_of_subsets(X133,X134),powerset(X133)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_setfam_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(esk6_0,powerset(powerset(esk5_0)))
    & esk6_0 != empty_set
    & meet_of_subsets(esk5_0,complements_of_subsets(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != subset_complement(esk5_0,union_of_subsets(esk5_0,esk6_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subset_difference(X2,X1,X3) = set_difference(X1,X3)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | subset_difference(X2,X2,union_of_subsets(X2,X1)) = meet_of_subsets(X2,complements_of_subsets(X2,X1))
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(powerset(X2))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    element(X1,powerset(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( element(union_of_subsets(X2,X1),powerset(X2))
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(powerset(X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    meet_of_subsets(esk5_0,complements_of_subsets(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != subset_complement(esk5_0,union_of_subsets(esk5_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( meet_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = set_difference(X1,union_of_subsets(X1,X2))
    | X2 = empty_set
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk6_0,powerset(powerset(esk5_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    esk6_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X128,X129] :
      ( ~ element(X129,powerset(X128))
      | subset_complement(X128,X129) = set_difference(X128,X129) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_subset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    subset_complement(esk5_0,union_of_subsets(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != set_difference(esk5_0,union_of_subsets(esk5_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( subset_complement(X2,X1) = set_difference(X2,X1)
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ element(union_of_subsets(esk5_0,esk6_0),powerset(esk5_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_20]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU327+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:57:26 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.59/1.81  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.59/1.81  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.59/1.81  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.59/1.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.59/1.82  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------