↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU328+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:19:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   91 (  44 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  40   ~;  31   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   5 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t12_tops_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => ( X2 != empty_set
       => union_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = subset_complement(X1,meet_of_subsets(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t12_tops_2) ).

fof(involutiveness_k3_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
     => subset_complement(X1,subset_complement(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',involutiveness_k3_subset_1) ).

fof(t11_tops_2,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => ( X2 != empty_set
       => meet_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = subset_complement(X1,union_of_subsets(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t11_tops_2) ).

fof(dt_k5_setfam_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => element(union_of_subsets(X1,X2),powerset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k5_setfam_1) ).

fof(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = empty_set
    <=> ! [X2] : ~ in(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_xboole_0) ).

fof(l71_subset_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) )
     => element(X1,powerset(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l71_subset_1) ).

fof(involutiveness_k7_setfam_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => complements_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',involutiveness_k7_setfam_1) ).

fof(t10_tops_2,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => ( ~ ( X2 != empty_set
            & complements_of_subsets(X1,X2) = empty_set )
        & ~ ( complements_of_subsets(X1,X2) != empty_set
            & X2 = empty_set ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t10_tops_2) ).

fof(dt_k7_setfam_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
     => element(complements_of_subsets(X1,X2),powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k7_setfam_1) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1)))
       => ( X2 != empty_set
         => union_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = subset_complement(X1,meet_of_subsets(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t12_tops_2]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ element(X4,powerset(X3))
      | subset_complement(X3,subset_complement(X3,X4)) = X4 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[involutiveness_k3_subset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ element(X4,powerset(powerset(X3)))
      | X4 = empty_set
      | meet_of_subsets(X3,complements_of_subsets(X3,X4)) = subset_complement(X3,union_of_subsets(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t11_tops_2])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ element(X4,powerset(powerset(X3)))
      | element(union_of_subsets(X3,X4),powerset(X3)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_setfam_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(esk2_0,powerset(powerset(esk1_0)))
    & esk2_0 != empty_set
    & union_of_subsets(esk1_0,complements_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0)) != subset_complement(esk1_0,meet_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset_complement(X1,subset_complement(X1,X2)) = X2
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,lemma,
    ( meet_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = subset_complement(X1,union_of_subsets(X1,X2))
    | X2 = empty_set
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( element(union_of_subsets(X1,X2),powerset(X1))
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3] :
      ( ( X3 != empty_set
        | ~ in(X4,X3) )
      & ( in(esk6_1(X3),X3)
        | X3 = empty_set ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_xboole_0])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,lemma,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( in(esk10_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | element(X4,powerset(X5)) )
      & ( ~ in(esk10_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | element(X4,powerset(X5)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l71_subset_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    union_of_subsets(esk1_0,complements_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0)) != subset_complement(esk1_0,meet_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,lemma,
    ( union_of_subsets(X1,X2) = subset_complement(X1,meet_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)))
    | X2 = empty_set
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ element(X4,powerset(powerset(X3)))
      | complements_of_subsets(X3,complements_of_subsets(X3,X4)) = X4 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[involutiveness_k7_setfam_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_22,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( X4 = empty_set
        | complements_of_subsets(X3,X4) != empty_set
        | ~ element(X4,powerset(powerset(X3))) )
      & ( complements_of_subsets(X3,X4) = empty_set
        | X4 != empty_set
        | ~ element(X4,powerset(powerset(X3))) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t10_tops_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,lemma,
    ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | in(esk10_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( complements_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0) = empty_set
    | subset_complement(esk1_0,meet_of_subsets(esk1_0,complements_of_subsets(esk1_0,complements_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0)))) != subset_complement(esk1_0,meet_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | ~ element(complements_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0),powerset(powerset(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( complements_of_subsets(X1,complements_of_subsets(X1,X2)) = X2
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk2_0,powerset(powerset(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ element(X4,powerset(powerset(X3)))
      | element(complements_of_subsets(X3,X4),powerset(powerset(X3))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k7_setfam_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,lemma,
    ( complements_of_subsets(X2,X1) = empty_set
    | ~ element(X1,powerset(powerset(X2)))
    | X1 != empty_set ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,lemma,
    ( element(X1,powerset(X2))
    | X1 != empty_set ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( complements_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0) = empty_set
    | ~ element(complements_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0),powerset(powerset(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( element(complements_of_subsets(X1,X2),powerset(powerset(X1)))
    | ~ element(X2,powerset(powerset(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
    ( complements_of_subsets(X1,empty_set) = X2
    | X2 != empty_set ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    complements_of_subsets(esk1_0,esk2_0) = empty_set,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,lemma,
    complements_of_subsets(X1,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_0 != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_27])]),c_0_36]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SEU328+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 21:15:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.27/1.45  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.046 s
% 0.27/1.45  
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object total steps             : 38
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object clause steps            : 19
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object formula steps           : 19
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 9
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object generating inferences   : 8
% 0.27/1.45  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 10
% 0.27/1.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 541
% 0.27/1.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 440
% 0.27/1.45  # Initial clauses                      : 267
% 0.27/1.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.27/1.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 266
% 0.27/1.45  # Processed clauses                    : 1809
% 0.27/1.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 15
% 0.27/1.45  # ...subsumed                          : 1021
% 0.27/1.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 773
% 0.27/1.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 64
% 0.27/1.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 58
% 0.27/1.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 55
% 0.27/1.45  # Generated clauses                    : 7869
% 0.27/1.45  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 6974
% 0.27/1.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 321
% 0.27/1.45  # Paramodulations                      : 7769
% 0.27/1.45  # Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.27/1.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 107
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 645
% 0.27/1.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 45
% 0.27/1.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 33
% 0.27/1.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 567
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5162
% 0.27/1.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 24434
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 114
% 0.27/1.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 96550
% 0.27/1.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55181
% 0.27/1.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 846
% 0.27/1.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2316
% 0.27/1.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 89
% 0.27/1.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.27/1.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.27/1.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 136209
% 0.27/1.45  
% 0.27/1.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45  # User time                : 0.249 s
% 0.27/1.45  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.27/1.45  # Total time               : 0.256 s
% 0.27/1.45  # Maximum resident set size: 9864 pages
% 0.27/23.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.27/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.27/23.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/23.53  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------