↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU344+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:29:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 35.17s 5.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 35.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  164 (  42 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  186 (  71   ~;  70   |;  23   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   16 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (   4 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t2_lattice3,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
     => ! [X3] :
          ( element(X3,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
         => ( below(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3)
          <=> subset(X2,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_lattice3) ).

fof(d1_lattice3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( latt_str(X2)
        & strict_latt_str(X2) )
     => ( X2 = boole_lattice(X1)
      <=> ( ! [X3] :
              ( element(X3,powerset(X1))
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( element(X4,powerset(X1))
                 => ( apply_binary(the_L_meet(X2),X3,X4) = subset_intersection2(X1,X3,X4)
                    & apply_binary(the_L_join(X2),X3,X4) = subset_union2(X1,X3,X4) ) ) )
          & the_carrier(X2) = powerset(X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_lattice3) ).

fof(dt_k1_lattice3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( latt_str(boole_lattice(X1))
      & strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_lattice3) ).

fof(d3_lattices,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
             => ( below(X1,X2,X3)
              <=> join(X1,X2,X3) = X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_lattices) ).

fof(fc1_lattice3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X1))
      & ~ empty_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc1_lattice3) ).

fof(t1_lattice3,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
     => ! [X3] :
          ( element(X3,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
         => ( meet(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3) = set_intersection2(X2,X3)
            & join(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3) = set_union2(X2,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_lattice3) ).

fof(dt_l3_lattices,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( latt_str(X1)
     => ( join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & meet_semilatt_str(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_l3_lattices) ).

fof(t12_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
     => set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_xboole_1) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] : subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( element(X2,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
       => ! [X3] :
            ( element(X3,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
           => ( below(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3)
            <=> subset(X2,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t2_lattice3]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X346,X347,X348,X349] :
      ( ( ~ latt_str(X347)
        | ~ strict_latt_str(X347)
        | X347 = boole_lattice(X346)
        | the_carrier(X347) != powerset(X346)
        | apply_binary(the_L_meet(X347),esk61_2(X346,X347),esk62_2(X346,X347)) != subset_intersection2(X346,esk61_2(X346,X347),esk62_2(X346,X347))
        | apply_binary(the_L_join(X347),esk61_2(X346,X347),esk62_2(X346,X347)) != subset_union2(X346,esk61_2(X346,X347),esk62_2(X346,X347)) )
      & ( ~ latt_str(X347)
        | ~ strict_latt_str(X347)
        | X347 = boole_lattice(X346)
        | the_carrier(X347) != powerset(X346)
        | element(esk62_2(X346,X347),powerset(X346)) )
      & ( ~ latt_str(X347)
        | ~ strict_latt_str(X347)
        | X347 = boole_lattice(X346)
        | the_carrier(X347) != powerset(X346)
        | element(esk61_2(X346,X347),powerset(X346)) )
      & ( ~ latt_str(X347)
        | ~ strict_latt_str(X347)
        | X347 != boole_lattice(X346)
        | ~ element(X348,powerset(X346))
        | ~ element(X349,powerset(X346))
        | apply_binary(the_L_meet(X347),X348,X349) = subset_intersection2(X346,X348,X349) )
      & ( ~ latt_str(X347)
        | ~ strict_latt_str(X347)
        | X347 != boole_lattice(X346)
        | ~ element(X348,powerset(X346))
        | ~ element(X349,powerset(X346))
        | apply_binary(the_L_join(X347),X348,X349) = subset_union2(X346,X348,X349) )
      & ( ~ latt_str(X347)
        | ~ strict_latt_str(X347)
        | X347 != boole_lattice(X346)
        | the_carrier(X347) = powerset(X346) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_lattice3])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X63] :
      ( latt_str(boole_lattice(X63))
      & strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X63)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_lattice3]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( join_semilatt_str(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
             => ( below(X1,X2,X3)
              <=> join(X1,X2,X3) = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d3_lattices]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
      | below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) )
    & ( ~ subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) )
    & element(esk3_0,the_carrier(boole_lattice(esk1_0)))
    & element(esk2_0,the_carrier(boole_lattice(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ latt_str(X1)
    | ~ strict_latt_str(X1)
    | X1 != boole_lattice(X2)
    | the_carrier(X1) = powerset(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    latt_str(boole_lattice(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X1))
      & ~ empty_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc1_lattice3]) ).

fof(c_0_18,lemma,
    ! [X65,X66,X67] :
      ( ( ~ element(X66,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X65)))
        | ~ element(X67,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X65)))
        | meet(boole_lattice(X65),X66,X67) = set_intersection2(X66,X67) )
      & ( ~ element(X66,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X65)))
        | ~ element(X67,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X65)))
        | join(boole_lattice(X65),X66,X67) = set_union2(X66,X67) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_lattice3])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X51,X52,X53] :
      ( ( ~ join_semilatt_str(X51)
        | empty_carrier(X51)
        | ~ element(X52,the_carrier(X51))
        | ~ element(X53,the_carrier(X51))
        | below(X51,X52,X53)
        | join(X51,X52,X53) != X53 )
      & ( ~ join_semilatt_str(X51)
        | empty_carrier(X51)
        | ~ element(X52,the_carrier(X51))
        | ~ element(X53,the_carrier(X51))
        | join(X51,X52,X53) = X53
        | ~ below(X51,X52,X53) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk3_0,the_carrier(boole_lattice(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)) = powerset(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk2_0,the_carrier(boole_lattice(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X64] :
      ( strict_latt_str(boole_lattice(X64))
      & ~ empty_carrier(boole_lattice(X64)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,lemma,
    ( ~ element(X2,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
    | ~ element(X3,the_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)))
    | join(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3) = set_union2(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ below(X1,X2,X3)
    | empty_carrier(X1)
    | join(X1,X2,X3) = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk3_0,powerset(esk1_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk2_0,powerset(esk1_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ~ empty_carrier(boole_lattice(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X184] :
      ( ( ~ latt_str(X184)
        | join_semilatt_str(X184) )
      & ( ~ latt_str(X184)
        | meet_semilatt_str(X184) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_l3_lattices])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,lemma,
    ( ~ element(X2,powerset(X1))
    | ~ element(X3,powerset(X1))
    | join(boole_lattice(X1),X2,X3) = set_union2(X2,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_21]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(esk1_0))
    | subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | join(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_21]),c_0_27]),c_0_21]),c_0_28])]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ latt_str(X1)
    | join_semilatt_str(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ element(X1,powerset(esk1_0))
    | join(boole_lattice(esk1_0),X1,esk3_0) = set_union2(X1,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_27]) ).

fof(c_0_35,lemma,
    ! [X277,X278] :
      ( set_union2(X277,X278) = X278
      | ~ subset(X277,X278) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t12_xboole_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_36,lemma,
    ! [X288,X289] : subset(X288,set_union2(X288,X289)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | join(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    join(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) = set_union2(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,lemma,
    ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | set_union2(X1,X2) = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,lemma,
    subset(X1,set_union2(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    set_union2(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,lemma,
    subset(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ join_semilatt_str(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | join(X1,X2,X3) != X3
    | empty_carrier(X1)
    | below(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    join(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ below(boole_lattice(esk1_0),esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ join_semilatt_str(boole_lattice(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_21]),c_0_27]),c_0_21]),c_0_28])]),c_0_29]),c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_33]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU344+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.45  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.45  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:15:45 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 35.17/5.10  % Version: 3.5.1
% 35.17/5.10  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 35.17/5.10  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % new_bool_3 with pid 3588920 completed with status 0
% 35.17/5.10  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 35.17/5.10  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 35.17/5.10  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 35.17/5.10  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 35.17/5.10  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 35.17/5.10  % Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % new_bool_3 with pid 3588924 completed with status 0
% 35.17/5.10  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 35.17/5.10  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 35.17/5.10  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 35.17/5.10  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 35.17/5.10  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 35.17/5.10  % Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 35.17/5.10  % Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 35.17/5.10  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 35.17/5.10  
% 35.17/5.10  % Proof found!
% 35.17/5.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 35.17/5.10  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 35.17/5.10  % Parsed axioms                        : 599
% 35.17/5.10  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 394
% 35.17/5.10  % Initial clauses                      : 884
% 35.17/5.10  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 35.17/5.10  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 882
% 35.17/5.10  % Processed clauses                    : 27867
% 35.17/5.10  % ...of these trivial                  : 306
% 35.17/5.10  % ...subsumed                          : 21381
% 35.17/5.10  % ...remaining for further processing  : 6180
% 35.17/5.10  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 983
% 35.17/5.10  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 35.17/5.10  % Backward-subsumed                    : 153
% 35.17/5.10  % Backward-rewritten                   : 307
% 35.17/5.10  % Generated clauses                    : 158981
% 35.17/5.10  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 145805
% 35.17/5.10  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 35.17/5.10  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 67
% 35.17/5.10  % Paramodulations                      : 158061
% 35.17/5.10  % Factorizations                       : 19
% 35.17/5.10  % NegExts                              : 0
% 35.17/5.10  % Equation resolutions                 : 985
% 35.17/5.10  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 35.17/5.10  % Total rewrite steps                  : 22193
% 35.17/5.10  % ...of those cached                   : 18893
% 35.17/5.10  % Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 35.17/5.10  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 35.17/5.10  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 35.17/5.10  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 35.17/5.10  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 35.17/5.10  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 35.17/5.10  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 35.17/5.10  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.142
% 35.17/5.10  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.116
% 35.17/5.10  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 35.17/5.10  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 35.17/5.10  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 35.17/5.10  % Current number of processed clauses  : 4676
% 35.17/5.10  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 649
% 35.17/5.10  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 35.17/5.10  %    Negative unit clauses             : 706
% 35.17/5.10  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3319
% 35.17/5.10  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 119333
% 35.17/5.10  % ...number of literals in the above   : 416894
% 35.17/5.10  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 35.17/5.10  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1266
% 35.17/5.10  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2319393
% 35.17/5.10  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1235326
% 35.17/5.10  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10365
% 35.17/5.10  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 237287
% 35.17/5.10  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 35.17/5.10  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 478
% 35.17/5.10  % BW rewrite match successes           : 93
% 35.17/5.10  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 35.17/5.10  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 35.17/5.10  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2915023
% 35.17/5.10  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 13928
% 35.17/5.10  
% 35.17/5.10  % -------------------------------------------------
% 35.17/5.10  % User time                : 4.335 s
% 35.17/5.10  % System time              : 0.119 s
% 35.17/5.10  % Total time               : 4.454 s
% 35.17/5.10  % Maximum resident set size: 6240 pages
% 35.17/5.10  
% 35.17/5.10  % -------------------------------------------------
% 35.17/5.10  % User time                : 8.418 s
% 35.17/5.10  % System time              : 0.256 s
% 35.17/5.10  % Total time               : 8.673 s
% 35.17/5.10  % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 35.17/5.10  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------