↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU350+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 10.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  142 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  163 (  57   ~;  51   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t31_lattice3,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( latt_str(X2)
        & lattice(X2)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X2) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( element(X3,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X2)))
         => ( relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(X2),X1,X3)
          <=> latt_element_smaller(X2,cast_to_el_of_lattice(X2,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t31_lattice3) ).

fof(d4_lattice3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( latt_str(X1)
        & lattice(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X1)))
         => cast_to_el_of_lattice(X1,X2) = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_lattice3) ).

fof(dt_k5_lattice3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( element(X2,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X1)))
        & latt_str(X1)
        & lattice(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => element(cast_to_el_of_lattice(X1,X2),the_carrier(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_lattice3) ).

fof(d3_lattice3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( latt_str(X1)
        & lattice(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X1,X2) = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_lattice3) ).

fof(t30_lattice3,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( latt_str(X2)
        & lattice(X2)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X2) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( element(X3,the_carrier(X2))
         => ( latt_element_smaller(X2,X3,X1)
          <=> relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(X2),X1,cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X2,X3)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t30_lattice3) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( latt_str(X2)
          & lattice(X2)
          & ~ empty_carrier(X2) )
       => ! [X3] :
            ( element(X3,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X2)))
           => ( relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(X2),X1,X3)
            <=> latt_element_smaller(X2,cast_to_el_of_lattice(X2,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t31_lattice3]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( latt_str(X1)
        & lattice(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X1)))
         => cast_to_el_of_lattice(X1,X2) = X2 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_lattice3]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( latt_str(X2)
          & lattice(X2)
          & ~ empty_carrier(X2) )
       => ! [X3] :
            ( element(X3,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X2)))
           => ( relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(X2),X1,X3)
            <=> latt_element_smaller(X2,cast_to_el_of_lattice(X2,X3),X1) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( element(X2,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X1)))
        & latt_str(X1)
        & lattice(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => element(cast_to_el_of_lattice(X1,X2),the_carrier(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_lattice3]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X33,X34] :
      ( cast_to_el_of_lattice(X33,X34) = X34
      | ~ element(X34,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X33)))
      | ~ latt_str(X33)
      | ~ lattice(X33)
      | empty_carrier(X33) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( latt_element_smaller(esk2_0,cast_to_el_of_lattice(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk1_0)
      | relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0),esk1_0,esk3_0) )
    & ( ~ latt_element_smaller(esk2_0,cast_to_el_of_lattice(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk1_0)
      | ~ relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0),esk1_0,esk3_0) )
    & element(esk3_0,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0)))
    & latt_str(esk2_0)
    & lattice(esk2_0)
    & ~ empty_carrier(esk2_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( latt_str(X1)
        & lattice(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X1,X2) = X2 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d3_lattice3]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] :
      ( element(cast_to_el_of_lattice(X35,X36),the_carrier(X35))
      | ~ element(X36,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X35)))
      | ~ latt_str(X35)
      | ~ lattice(X35)
      | empty_carrier(X35) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ element(X2,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X1)))
    | ~ latt_str(X1)
    | ~ lattice(X1)
    | cast_to_el_of_lattice(X1,X2) = X2
    | empty_carrier(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk3_0,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    lattice(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    latt_str(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ empty_carrier(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_18,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( latt_str(X2)
        & lattice(X2)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X2) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( element(X3,the_carrier(X2))
         => ( latt_element_smaller(X2,X3,X1)
          <=> relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(X2),X1,cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X2,X3)) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t30_lattice3]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X83,X84] :
      ( cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X83,X84) = X84
      | ~ element(X84,the_carrier(X83))
      | ~ latt_str(X83)
      | ~ lattice(X83)
      | empty_carrier(X83) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ element(X2,the_carrier(poset_of_lattice(X1)))
    | ~ latt_str(X1)
    | ~ lattice(X1)
    | element(cast_to_el_of_lattice(X1,X2),the_carrier(X1))
    | empty_carrier(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    cast_to_el_of_lattice(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_22,lemma,
    ! [X30,X31,X32] :
      ( ( ~ latt_str(X31)
        | ~ lattice(X31)
        | empty_carrier(X31)
        | ~ element(X32,the_carrier(X31))
        | latt_element_smaller(X31,X32,X30)
        | ~ relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(X31),X30,cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X31,X32)) )
      & ( ~ latt_str(X31)
        | ~ lattice(X31)
        | empty_carrier(X31)
        | ~ element(X32,the_carrier(X31))
        | relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(X31),X30,cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X31,X32))
        | ~ latt_element_smaller(X31,X32,X30) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ latt_str(X1)
    | ~ lattice(X1)
    | cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X1,X2) = X2
    | empty_carrier(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk3_0,the_carrier(esk2_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]),c_0_21]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
    ( ~ latt_str(X1)
    | ~ lattice(X1)
    | ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(X1),X2,cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X1,X3))
    | empty_carrier(X1)
    | latt_element_smaller(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(esk2_0,esk3_0) = esk3_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( latt_element_smaller(esk2_0,cast_to_el_of_lattice(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk1_0)
    | relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0),esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ latt_element_smaller(esk2_0,cast_to_el_of_lattice(esk2_0,esk3_0),esk1_0)
    | ~ relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0),esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0),X1,esk3_0)
    | latt_element_smaller(esk2_0,esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_15]),c_0_24]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( latt_element_smaller(esk2_0,esk3_0,esk1_0)
    | relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0),esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ latt_element_smaller(esk2_0,esk3_0,esk1_0)
    | ~ relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0),esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    latt_element_smaller(esk2_0,esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
    ( ~ latt_str(X1)
    | ~ lattice(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ latt_element_smaller(X1,X2,X3)
    | empty_carrier(X1)
    | relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(X1),X3,cast_to_el_of_LattPOSet(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ relstr_set_smaller(poset_of_lattice(esk2_0),esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_32]),c_0_26]),c_0_15]),c_0_24]),c_0_16])]),c_0_34]),c_0_17]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SEU350+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/10.59  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/10.59  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/10.59  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/10.59  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/10.59  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/10.59  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/10.59  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/10.59  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:14:24 UTC 2026
% 0.11/10.59  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/10.59  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/10.63  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/10.63  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/10.90  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/10.90  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.90  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % new_bool_1 with pid 2164814 completed with status 0
% 0.14/10.90  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/10.90  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.90  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/10.90  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/10.90  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/10.90  % Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting new_bool_1 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % new_bool_1 with pid 2164817 completed with status 0
% 0.14/10.90  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/10.90  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/10.90  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/10.90  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/10.90  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/10.90  % Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Starting new_bool_1 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.14/10.90  % Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 0.14/10.90  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/10.90  
% 0.14/10.90  % Proof found!
% 0.14/10.90  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/10.90  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/10.90  % Parsed axioms                        : 640
% 0.14/10.90  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 557
% 0.14/10.90  % Initial clauses                      : 512
% 0.14/10.90  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 0.14/10.90  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 508
% 0.14/10.90  % Processed clauses                    : 1095
% 0.14/10.90  % ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.14/10.90  % ...subsumed                          : 64
% 0.14/10.90  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1028
% 0.14/10.90  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 207
% 0.14/10.90  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/10.90  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.14/10.90  % Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.14/10.90  % Generated clauses                    : 1349
% 0.14/10.90  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1307
% 0.14/10.90  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/10.90  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 19
% 0.14/10.90  % Paramodulations                      : 1187
% 0.14/10.90  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/10.90  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/10.90  % Equation resolutions                 : 209
% 0.14/10.90  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/10.90  % Total rewrite steps                  : 281
% 0.14/10.90  % ...of those cached                   : 236
% 0.14/10.90  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/10.90  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/10.90  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/10.90  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/10.90  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/10.90  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/10.90  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/10.90  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/10.90  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/10.90  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/10.90  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/10.90  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/10.90  % Current number of processed clauses  : 386
% 0.14/10.90  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 84
% 0.14/10.90  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/10.90  %    Negative unit clauses             : 31
% 0.14/10.90  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 271
% 0.14/10.90  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1179
% 0.14/10.90  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4882
% 0.14/10.90  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/10.90  % Current number of archived clauses   : 482
% 0.14/10.90  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 159445
% 0.14/10.90  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15304
% 0.14/10.90  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 82
% 0.14/10.90  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 680
% 0.14/10.90  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/10.90  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 56
% 0.14/10.90  % BW rewrite match successes           : 6
% 0.14/10.90  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/10.90  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/10.90  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 83403
% 0.14/10.90  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 11247
% 0.14/10.90  
% 0.14/10.90  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/10.90  % User time                : 0.216 s
% 0.14/10.90  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.14/10.90  % Total time               : 0.223 s
% 0.14/10.90  % Maximum resident set size: 5744 pages
% 0.14/10.90  
% 0.14/10.90  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/10.90  % User time                : 0.432 s
% 0.14/10.90  % System time              : 0.026 s
% 0.14/10.90  % Total time               : 0.459 s
% 0.14/10.90  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.14/10.90  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------