↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU354+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:11:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.36s 3.16s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  19   ~;  13   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t5_tex_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
     => ( proper_element(X2,powerset(X1))
      <=> X2 != X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t5_tex_2) ).

fof(d2_tex_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( element(X2,X1)
     => ( proper_element(X2,X1)
      <=> X2 != union(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_tex_2) ).

fof(dt_k2_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : element(cast_to_subset(X1),powerset(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_subset_1) ).

fof(d4_subset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : cast_to_subset(X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_subset_1) ).

fof(t99_zfmisc_1,lemma,
    ! [X1] : union(powerset(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t99_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( element(X2,powerset(X1))
       => ( proper_element(X2,powerset(X1))
        <=> X2 != X1 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t5_tex_2]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2175,X2176] :
      ( ( ~ proper_element(X2176,X2175)
        | X2176 != union(X2175)
        | ~ element(X2176,X2175) )
      & ( X2176 = union(X2175)
        | proper_element(X2176,X2175)
        | ~ element(X2176,X2175) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tex_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2469] : element(cast_to_subset(X2469),powerset(X2469)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X2280] : cast_to_subset(X2280) = X2280,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d4_subset_1]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( element(esk440_0,powerset(esk439_0))
    & ( ~ proper_element(esk440_0,powerset(esk439_0))
      | esk440_0 = esk439_0 )
    & ( proper_element(esk440_0,powerset(esk439_0))
      | esk440_0 != esk439_0 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,lemma,
    ! [X3915] : union(powerset(X3915)) = X3915,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t99_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ proper_element(X1,X2)
    | X1 != union(X2)
    | ~ element(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    element(cast_to_subset(X1),powerset(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    cast_to_subset(X1) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = union(X2)
    | proper_element(X1,X2)
    | ~ element(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk440_0,powerset(esk439_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,lemma,
    union(powerset(X1)) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk440_0 = esk439_0
    | ~ proper_element(esk440_0,powerset(esk439_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ proper_element(union(X1),X1)
    | ~ element(union(X1),X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    element(X1,powerset(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( proper_element(esk440_0,powerset(esk439_0))
    | esk440_0 != esk439_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    esk439_0 = esk440_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,lemma,
    ~ proper_element(X1,powerset(X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_21])]),c_0_22]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SEU354+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:59:51 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 4.36/3.16  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 4.36/3.16  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 4.36/3.16  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.36/3.16  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.36/3.17  % Total time : 2.591s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------