↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SEU360+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:49:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 22.65s 6.51s
% Output   : Proof 59.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SEU360+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:10:22 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.63/0.68          ____       _                          
% 0.63/0.68    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.63/0.68   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.63/0.68  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.63/0.68  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.63/0.68  
% 0.63/0.68  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.63/0.68  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.63/0.68  
% 0.63/0.68  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.63/0.68  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.63/0.68  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.63/0.68  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.63/0.68  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.63/0.68  
% 0.63/0.68  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.63/0.68  
% 0.63/0.68  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.83/0.75  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.77/1.13  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.26/1.37  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.38/1.40  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 20.42/6.04  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 20.42/6.08  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 21.33/6.25  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 21.33/6.26  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 22.56/6.51  Prover 1: proved (468ms)
% 22.56/6.51  Prover 0: stopped
% 22.65/6.51  
% 22.65/6.51  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 22.65/6.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 22.65/6.51  
% 22.65/6.51  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 57.68/16.73  found it (size 572)
% 57.68/16.73  
% 57.68/16.73  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 57.68/16.73  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 57.68/16.73  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] : ( ~ (v11 = 0) &  ~ (v8 = 0) &  ~ (v6 = 0) &  ~ (v1 = 0) & ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v0, v3) = v4 & antisymmetric_relstr(v0) = 0 & ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v0, empty_set) = v2 & empty_carrier(v5) = v6 & empty_carrier(v0) = v1 & one_sorted_str(v12) = 0 & one_sorted_str(v5) = 0 & lower_bounded_relstr(v0) = 0 & rel_str(v13) = 0 & rel_str(v0) = 0 & the_carrier(v0) = v3 & finite(v10) = 0 & empty(v10) = v11 & empty(v9) = 0 & empty(v7) = v8 & empty(empty_set) = 0 &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (relstr_set_smaller(v18, v17, v16) = v15) |  ~ (relstr_set_smaller(v18, v17, v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (related(v18, v17, v16) = v15) |  ~ (related(v18, v17, v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v18, v17, v16) = v15) |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v18, v17, v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v17, v16) = v15) |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v17, v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v17, v16) = v15) |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v17, v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (element(v17, v16) = v15) |  ~ (element(v17, v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (in(v17, v16) = v15) |  ~ (in(v17, v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] : (v16 = 0 |  ~ (in(v14, v15) = v16) |  ? [v17] :  ? [v18] : (element(v14, v15) = v17 & empty(v15) = v18 & ( ~ (v17 = 0) | v18 = 0))) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v16) = v15) |  ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (empty_carrier(v16) = v15) |  ~ (empty_carrier(v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (one_sorted_str(v16) = v15) |  ~ (one_sorted_str(v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (lower_bounded_relstr(v16) = v15) |  ~ (lower_bounded_relstr(v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (rel_str(v16) = v15) |  ~ (rel_str(v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (the_carrier(v16) = v15) |  ~ (the_carrier(v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (finite(v16) = v15) |  ~ (finite(v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] :  ! [v16] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (empty(v16) = v15) |  ~ (empty(v16) = v14)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = v14 |  ~ (empty(v15) = 0) |  ~ (empty(v14) = 0)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 |  ~ (empty_carrier(v14) = v15) |  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] :  ? [v18] : (one_sorted_str(v14) = v16 & the_carrier(v14) = v17 & empty(v17) = v18 & ( ~ (v18 = 0) |  ~ (v16 = 0)))) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 |  ~ (one_sorted_str(v14) = v15) |  ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & rel_str(v14) = v16)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : (v15 = 0 |  ~ (finite(v14) = v15) |  ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & empty(v14) = v16)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : ( ~ (lower_bounded_relstr(v14) = v15) |  ? [v16] :  ? [v17] :  ? [v18] :  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] : (rel_str(v14) = v16 & the_carrier(v14) = v17 & ( ~ (v16 = 0) | (( ~ (v15 = 0) | (v20 = 0 & v19 = 0 & element(v18, v17) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(v14, v17, v18) = 0)) & (v15 = 0 |  ! [v21] : ( ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v14, v17, v21) = 0) |  ? [v22] : ( ~ (v22 = 0) & element(v21, v17) = v22))))))) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : ( ~ (in(v14, v15) = 0) | element(v14, v15) = 0) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : ( ~ (in(v14, v15) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & empty(v15) = v16)) &  ! [v14] :  ! [v15] : ( ~ (in(v14, v15) = 0) |  ? [v16] : ( ~ (v16 = 0) & in(v15, v14) = v16)) &  ! [v14] : (v14 = empty_set |  ~ (empty(v14) = 0)) &  ! [v14] : ( ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v14) = 0) |  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : (rel_str(v14) = v15 & the_carrier(v14) = v16 & ( ~ (v15 = 0) | ( ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v18 = 0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v14, v17) = v18) |  ~ (element(v19, v16) = 0) |  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : ((v22 = 0 & v21 = 0 &  ~ (v23 = 0) & related(v14, v20, v19) = v23 & element(v20, v16) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(v14, v17, v20) = 0) | ( ~ (v20 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(v14, v17, v19) = v20))) &  ! [v17] : ( ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v14, v17) = 0) |  ? [v18] : (element(v18, v16) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(v14, v17, v18) = 0 &  ! [v19] : ( ~ (element(v19, v16) = 0) |  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] : (related(v14, v19, v18) = v21 & relstr_element_smaller(v14, v17, v19) = v20 & ( ~ (v20 = 0) | v21 = 0))))))))) &  ! [v14] : ( ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v14) = 0) |  ? [v15] :  ? [v16] : (rel_str(v14) = v15 & the_carrier(v14) = v16 & ( ~ (v15 = 0) | ( ! [v17] :  ! [v18] :  ! [v19] : (v18 = 0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v14, v17) = v18) |  ~ (element(v19, v16) = 0) |  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] :  ? [v23] : ((v22 = 0 & v21 = 0 &  ~ (v23 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(v14, v17, v20) = 0 & related(v14, v19, v20) = v23 & element(v20, v16) = 0) | ( ~ (v20 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(v14, v17, v19) = v20))) &  ! [v17] : ( ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v14, v17) = 0) |  ? [v18] : (relstr_set_smaller(v14, v17, v18) = 0 & element(v18, v16) = 0 &  ! [v19] : ( ~ (element(v19, v16) = 0) |  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] : (relstr_set_smaller(v14, v17, v19) = v20 & related(v14, v18, v19) = v21 & ( ~ (v20 = 0) | v21 = 0))))))))) &  ! [v14] : ( ~ (rel_str(v14) = 0) |  ? [v15] : (the_carrier(v14) = v15 &  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : (v18 = 0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v14, v16, v17) = v18) |  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] :  ? [v21] :  ? [v22] : ((v21 = 0 & v20 = 0 &  ~ (v22 = 0) & related(v14, v17, v19) = v22 & element(v19, v15) = 0 & in(v19, v16) = 0) | ( ~ (v19 = 0) & element(v17, v15) = v19))) &  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] :  ! [v18] : ( ~ (element(v18, v15) = 0) |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v14, v16, v17) = 0) |  ? [v19] :  ? [v20] : (( ~ (v19 = 0) & element(v17, v15) = v19) | (related(v14, v17, v18) = v20 & in(v18, v16) = v19 & ( ~ (v19 = 0) | v20 = 0)))))) &  ! [v14] : ( ~ (rel_str(v14) = 0) |  ? [v15] : (the_carrier(v14) = v15 &  ! [v16] :  ! [v17] : ( ~ (relstr_set_smaller(v14, empty_set, v16) = v17) |  ? [v18] :  ? [v19] : (element(v16, v15) = v18 & relstr_element_smaller(v14, empty_set, v16) = v19 & ( ~ (v18 = 0) | (v19 = 0 & v17 = 0)))))) &  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : element(v15, v14) = 0 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0)))
% 57.68/16.80  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9, all_0_10_10, all_0_11_11, all_0_12_12, all_0_13_13 yields:
% 57.68/16.81  | (1)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_5_5 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_7_7 = 0) &  ~ (all_0_12_12 = 0) & ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10) = all_0_9_9 & antisymmetric_relstr(all_0_13_13) = 0 & ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, empty_set) = all_0_11_11 & empty_carrier(all_0_8_8) = all_0_7_7 & empty_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_0_12_12 & one_sorted_str(all_0_1_1) = 0 & one_sorted_str(all_0_8_8) = 0 & lower_bounded_relstr(all_0_13_13) = 0 & rel_str(all_0_0_0) = 0 & rel_str(all_0_13_13) = 0 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_0_10_10 & finite(all_0_3_3) = 0 & empty(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2 & empty(all_0_4_4) = 0 & empty(all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5 & empty(empty_set) = 0 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relstr_set_smaller(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relstr_set_smaller(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (related(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (related(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v4, v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (element(v0, v1) = v3 & empty(v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v2) = v1) |  ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty_carrier(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty_carrier(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (one_sorted_str(v2) = v1) |  ~ (one_sorted_str(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (lower_bounded_relstr(v2) = v1) |  ~ (lower_bounded_relstr(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rel_str(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rel_str(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (the_carrier(v2) = v1) |  ~ (the_carrier(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (finite(v2) = v1) |  ~ (finite(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v1) = 0) |  ~ (empty(v0) = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (empty_carrier(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (one_sorted_str(v0) = v2 & the_carrier(v0) = v3 & empty(v3) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (one_sorted_str(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & rel_str(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (finite(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & empty(v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (lower_bounded_relstr(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (rel_str(v0) = v2 & the_carrier(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 & element(v4, v3) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v4) = 0)) & (v1 = 0 |  ! [v7] : ( ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & element(v7, v3) = v8))))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) | element(v0, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & empty(v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & in(v1, v0) = v2)) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = empty_set |  ~ (empty(v0) = 0)) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (rel_str(v0) = v1 & the_carrier(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ( ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (element(v5, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 &  ~ (v9 = 0) & related(v0, v6, v5) = v9 & element(v6, v2) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v6) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v5) = v6))) &  ! [v3] : ( ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v0, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] : (element(v4, v2) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v4) = 0 &  ! [v5] : ( ~ (element(v5, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (related(v0, v5, v4) = v7 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v5) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0))))))))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (rel_str(v0) = v1 & the_carrier(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ( ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (element(v5, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 &  ~ (v9 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(v0, v3, v6) = 0 & related(v0, v5, v6) = v9 & element(v6, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(v0, v3, v5) = v6))) &  ! [v3] : ( ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v0, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] : (relstr_set_smaller(v0, v3, v4) = 0 & element(v4, v2) = 0 &  ! [v5] : ( ~ (element(v5, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (relstr_set_smaller(v0, v3, v5) = v6 & related(v0, v4, v5) = v7 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0))))))))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (rel_str(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (the_carrier(v0) = v1 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v0, v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v7 = 0 & v6 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0) & related(v0, v3, v5) = v8 & element(v5, v1) = 0 & in(v5, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & element(v3, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (element(v4, v1) = 0) |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v0, v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (( ~ (v5 = 0) & element(v3, v1) = v5) | (related(v0, v3, v4) = v6 & in(v4, v2) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0)))))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (rel_str(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (the_carrier(v0) = v1 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (relstr_set_smaller(v0, empty_set, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (element(v2, v1) = v4 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, empty_set, v2) = v5 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0)))))) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : element(v1, v0) = 0 & ( ~ (all_0_9_9 = 0) |  ~ (all_0_11_11 = 0))
% 58.09/16.82  |
% 58.09/16.82  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 58.09/16.83  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.83  | (3)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (rel_str(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (the_carrier(v0) = v1 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v0, v2, v3) = v4) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v7 = 0 & v6 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0) & related(v0, v3, v5) = v8 & element(v5, v1) = 0 & in(v5, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & element(v3, v1) = v5))) &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (element(v4, v1) = 0) |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v0, v2, v3) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (( ~ (v5 = 0) & element(v3, v1) = v5) | (related(v0, v3, v4) = v6 & in(v4, v2) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))))))
% 58.09/16.83  | (4)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (rel_str(v0) = v1 & the_carrier(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ( ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (element(v5, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 &  ~ (v9 = 0) & related(v0, v6, v5) = v9 & element(v6, v2) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v6) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v5) = v6))) &  ! [v3] : ( ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v0, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] : (element(v4, v2) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v4) = 0 &  ! [v5] : ( ~ (element(v5, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (related(v0, v5, v4) = v7 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v5) = v6 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0)))))))))
% 58.09/16.83  | (5)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (empty_carrier(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (one_sorted_str(v0) = v2 & the_carrier(v0) = v3 & empty(v3) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0))))
% 58.09/16.83  | (6) antisymmetric_relstr(all_0_13_13) = 0
% 58.09/16.83  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) | element(v0, v1) = 0)
% 58.09/16.83  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v3, v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.83  | (9) ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10) = all_0_9_9
% 58.09/16.83  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v1) = 0) |  ~ (empty(v0) = 0))
% 58.09/16.83  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.83  | (12)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (rel_str(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (the_carrier(v0) = v1 &  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (relstr_set_smaller(v0, empty_set, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (element(v2, v1) = v4 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, empty_set, v2) = v5 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0))))))
% 58.09/16.83  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty_carrier(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty_carrier(v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.83  | (14)  ~ (all_0_5_5 = 0)
% 58.09/16.83  | (15) ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, empty_set) = all_0_11_11
% 58.09/16.83  | (16) empty(all_0_4_4) = 0
% 58.09/16.83  | (17) empty(all_0_3_3) = all_0_2_2
% 58.09/16.83  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v2) = v1) |  ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.83  | (19) finite(all_0_3_3) = 0
% 58.09/16.83  | (20)  ~ (all_0_2_2 = 0)
% 58.09/16.83  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (related(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (related(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.83  | (22)  ! [v0] : (v0 = empty_set |  ~ (empty(v0) = 0))
% 58.09/16.84  | (23) the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.84  | (24) one_sorted_str(all_0_1_1) = 0
% 58.09/16.84  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (lower_bounded_relstr(v2) = v1) |  ~ (lower_bounded_relstr(v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.84  | (26) rel_str(all_0_0_0) = 0
% 58.09/16.84  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.84  | (28) empty_carrier(all_0_8_8) = all_0_7_7
% 58.09/16.84  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (finite(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & empty(v0) = v2))
% 58.09/16.84  | (30)  ~ (all_0_7_7 = 0)
% 58.09/16.84  | (31)  ~ (all_0_9_9 = 0) |  ~ (all_0_11_11 = 0)
% 58.09/16.84  | (32) empty_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_0_12_12
% 58.09/16.84  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (element(v0, v1) = v3 & empty(v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))
% 58.09/16.84  | (34) rel_str(all_0_13_13) = 0
% 58.09/16.84  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & empty(v1) = v2))
% 58.09/16.84  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (finite(v2) = v1) |  ~ (finite(v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.84  | (37) lower_bounded_relstr(all_0_13_13) = 0
% 58.09/16.84  | (38)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (antisymmetric_relstr(v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (rel_str(v0) = v1 & the_carrier(v0) = v2 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | ( ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (element(v5, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ((v8 = 0 & v7 = 0 &  ~ (v9 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(v0, v3, v6) = 0 & related(v0, v5, v6) = v9 & element(v6, v2) = 0) | ( ~ (v6 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(v0, v3, v5) = v6))) &  ! [v3] : ( ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(v0, v3) = 0) |  ? [v4] : (relstr_set_smaller(v0, v3, v4) = 0 & element(v4, v2) = 0 &  ! [v5] : ( ~ (element(v5, v2) = 0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : (relstr_set_smaller(v0, v3, v5) = v6 & related(v0, v4, v5) = v7 & ( ~ (v6 = 0) | v7 = 0)))))))))
% 58.09/16.84  | (39)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : element(v1, v0) = 0
% 58.09/16.84  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty(v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.84  | (41)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = 0)
% 58.09/16.84  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(v3, v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.84  | (43) empty(all_0_6_6) = all_0_5_5
% 58.09/16.84  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (rel_str(v2) = v1) |  ~ (rel_str(v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.84  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relstr_set_smaller(v4, v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relstr_set_smaller(v4, v3, v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.84  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (one_sorted_str(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & rel_str(v0) = v2))
% 58.09/16.84  | (47) empty(empty_set) = 0
% 58.09/16.84  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (one_sorted_str(v2) = v1) |  ~ (one_sorted_str(v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.84  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (lower_bounded_relstr(v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (rel_str(v0) = v2 & the_carrier(v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 & element(v4, v3) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v4) = 0)) & (v1 = 0 |  ! [v7] : ( ~ (relstr_element_smaller(v0, v3, v7) = 0) |  ? [v8] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & element(v7, v3) = v8)))))))
% 58.09/16.85  | (50)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & in(v1, v0) = v2))
% 58.09/16.85  | (51) one_sorted_str(all_0_8_8) = 0
% 58.09/16.85  | (52)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (the_carrier(v2) = v1) |  ~ (the_carrier(v2) = v0))
% 58.09/16.85  |
% 58.09/16.85  | Instantiating formula (10) with empty_set, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms empty(all_0_4_4) = 0, empty(empty_set) = 0, yields:
% 58.09/16.85  | (53) all_0_4_4 = empty_set
% 58.09/16.85  |
% 58.09/16.85  | From (53) and (16) follows:
% 58.09/16.85  | (47) empty(empty_set) = 0
% 58.09/16.85  |
% 58.09/16.85  | Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_13_13 and discharging atoms antisymmetric_relstr(all_0_13_13) = 0, yields:
% 58.09/16.85  | (55)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (rel_str(all_0_13_13) = v0 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | ( ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v2) = v3) |  ~ (element(v4, v1) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v7 = 0 & v6 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v5, v4) = v8 & element(v5, v1) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v2, v5) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v2, v4) = v5))) &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (element(v3, v1) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v2, v3) = 0 &  ! [v4] : ( ~ (element(v4, v1) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (related(all_0_13_13, v4, v3) = v6 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v2, v4) = v5 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))))))))
% 58.09/16.85  |
% 58.09/16.85  | Instantiating formula (38) with all_0_13_13 and discharging atoms antisymmetric_relstr(all_0_13_13) = 0, yields:
% 58.09/16.85  | (56)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (rel_str(all_0_13_13) = v0 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | ( ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v2) = v3) |  ~ (element(v4, v1) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] : ((v7 = 0 & v6 = 0 &  ~ (v8 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v2, v5) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, v4, v5) = v8 & element(v5, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v2, v4) = v5))) &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v2) = 0) |  ? [v3] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v2, v3) = 0 & element(v3, v1) = 0 &  ! [v4] : ( ~ (element(v4, v1) = 0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v2, v4) = v5 & related(all_0_13_13, v3, v4) = v6 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | v6 = 0))))))))
% 58.09/16.85  |
% 58.09/16.85  | Instantiating formula (5) with all_0_12_12, all_0_13_13 and discharging atoms empty_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_0_12_12, yields:
% 58.09/16.85  | (57) all_0_12_12 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (one_sorted_str(all_0_13_13) = v0 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = v1 & empty(v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 58.09/16.85  |
% 58.09/16.85  | Instantiating formula (49) with 0, all_0_13_13 and discharging atoms lower_bounded_relstr(all_0_13_13) = 0, yields:
% 58.09/16.85  | (58)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (rel_str(all_0_13_13) = v0 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v3 = 0 & element(v2, v1) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v1, v2) = 0)))
% 58.09/16.85  |
% 58.09/16.85  | Instantiating formula (3) with all_0_13_13 and discharging atoms rel_str(all_0_13_13) = 0, yields:
% 58.09/16.85  | (59)  ? [v0] : (the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = v0 &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 &  ~ (v7 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v2, v4) = v7 & element(v4, v0) = 0 & in(v4, v1) = 0) | ( ~ (v4 = 0) & element(v2, v0) = v4))) &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (element(v3, v0) = 0) |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v1, v2) = 0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : (( ~ (v4 = 0) & element(v2, v0) = v4) | (related(all_0_13_13, v2, v3) = v5 & in(v3, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | v5 = 0)))))
% 58.09/16.86  |
% 58.09/16.86  | Instantiating formula (12) with all_0_13_13 and discharging atoms rel_str(all_0_13_13) = 0, yields:
% 58.09/16.86  | (60)  ? [v0] : (the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = v0 &  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (element(v1, v0) = v3 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (v4 = 0 & v2 = 0)))))
% 58.09/16.86  |
% 58.09/16.86  | Instantiating (60) with all_14_0_16 yields:
% 58.09/16.86  | (61) the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_14_0_16 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (element(v0, all_14_0_16) = v2 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v1 = 0))))
% 58.09/16.86  |
% 58.09/16.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (61) yields:
% 58.09/16.86  | (62) the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_14_0_16
% 58.09/16.86  | (63)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = v1) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (element(v0, all_14_0_16) = v2 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v1 = 0))))
% 58.09/16.86  |
% 58.09/16.86  | Instantiating (59) with all_17_0_17 yields:
% 58.09/16.86  | (64) the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_17_0_17 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v1, v3) = v6 & element(v3, all_17_0_17) = 0 & in(v3, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & element(v1, all_17_0_17) = v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & element(v1, all_17_0_17) = v3) | (related(all_0_13_13, v1, v2) = v4 & in(v2, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))))
% 58.09/16.86  |
% 58.09/16.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (64) yields:
% 58.09/16.86  | (65) the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_17_0_17
% 58.09/16.86  | (66)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v1, v3) = v6 & element(v3, all_17_0_17) = 0 & in(v3, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & element(v1, all_17_0_17) = v3)))
% 58.09/16.86  | (67)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (( ~ (v3 = 0) & element(v1, all_17_0_17) = v3) | (related(all_0_13_13, v1, v2) = v4 & in(v2, v0) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))))
% 58.09/16.86  |
% 58.09/16.86  | Instantiating (58) with all_26_0_20, all_26_1_21, all_26_2_22, all_26_3_23, all_26_4_24 yields:
% 58.09/16.86  | (68) rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_26_4_24 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_26_3_23 & ( ~ (all_26_4_24 = 0) | (all_26_0_20 = 0 & all_26_1_21 = 0 & element(all_26_2_22, all_26_3_23) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_26_3_23, all_26_2_22) = 0))
% 58.09/16.86  |
% 58.09/16.86  | Applying alpha-rule on (68) yields:
% 58.09/16.86  | (69) rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_26_4_24
% 58.09/16.86  | (70) the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_26_3_23
% 58.09/16.86  | (71)  ~ (all_26_4_24 = 0) | (all_26_0_20 = 0 & all_26_1_21 = 0 & element(all_26_2_22, all_26_3_23) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_26_3_23, all_26_2_22) = 0)
% 58.09/16.86  |
% 58.09/16.86  | Instantiating (56) with all_28_0_25, all_28_1_26 yields:
% 58.09/16.86  | (72) rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_28_1_26 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_28_0_25 & ( ~ (all_28_1_26 = 0) | ( ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v3) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, v2, v3) = v6 & element(v3, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0 & element(v1, all_28_0_25) = 0 &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3 & related(all_0_13_13, v1, v2) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))))))
% 58.09/16.87  |
% 58.09/16.87  | Applying alpha-rule on (72) yields:
% 58.09/16.87  | (73) rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_28_1_26
% 58.09/16.87  | (74) the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_28_0_25
% 58.09/16.87  | (75)  ~ (all_28_1_26 = 0) | ( ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v3) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, v2, v3) = v6 & element(v3, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0 & element(v1, all_28_0_25) = 0 &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3 & related(all_0_13_13, v1, v2) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))))))
% 58.09/16.87  |
% 58.09/16.87  | Instantiating (55) with all_30_0_27, all_30_1_28 yields:
% 58.09/16.87  | (76) rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_30_1_28 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_30_0_27 & ( ~ (all_30_1_28 = 0) | ( ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v3, v2) = v6 & element(v3, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (element(v1, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (related(all_0_13_13, v2, v1) = v4 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))))))
% 58.09/16.87  |
% 58.09/16.87  | Applying alpha-rule on (76) yields:
% 58.09/16.87  | (77) rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_30_1_28
% 58.09/16.87  | (78) the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_30_0_27
% 58.09/16.87  | (79)  ~ (all_30_1_28 = 0) | ( ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v3, v2) = v6 & element(v3, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (element(v1, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (related(all_0_13_13, v2, v1) = v4 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0))))))
% 58.09/16.87  |
% 58.09/16.87  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (57), into two cases.
% 58.09/16.87  |-Branch one:
% 58.09/16.87  | (80) all_0_12_12 = 0
% 58.09/16.87  |
% 58.09/16.87  	| Equations (80) can reduce 41 to:
% 58.09/16.87  	| (81) $false
% 58.09/16.87  	|
% 58.09/16.87  	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.09/16.87  |-Branch two:
% 58.09/16.87  | (41)  ~ (all_0_12_12 = 0)
% 58.09/16.87  | (83)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (one_sorted_str(all_0_13_13) = v0 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = v1 & empty(v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 58.09/16.87  |
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating (83) with all_41_0_32, all_41_1_33, all_41_2_34 yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (84) one_sorted_str(all_0_13_13) = all_41_2_34 & the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_41_1_33 & empty(all_41_1_33) = all_41_0_32 & ( ~ (all_41_0_32 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_2_34 = 0))
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Applying alpha-rule on (84) yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (85) one_sorted_str(all_0_13_13) = all_41_2_34
% 58.09/16.88  	| (86) the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_41_1_33
% 58.09/16.88  	| (87) empty(all_41_1_33) = all_41_0_32
% 58.09/16.88  	| (88)  ~ (all_41_0_32 = 0) |  ~ (all_41_2_34 = 0)
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_13_13, all_30_1_28, 0 and discharging atoms rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_30_1_28, rel_str(all_0_13_13) = 0, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (89) all_30_1_28 = 0
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_13_13, all_28_1_26, all_30_1_28 and discharging atoms rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_30_1_28, rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_28_1_26, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (90) all_30_1_28 = all_28_1_26
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_13_13, all_26_4_24, all_30_1_28 and discharging atoms rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_30_1_28, rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_26_4_24, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (91) all_30_1_28 = all_26_4_24
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_13_13, all_30_0_27, all_41_1_33 and discharging atoms the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_41_1_33, the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_30_0_27, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (92) all_41_1_33 = all_30_0_27
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_13_13, all_28_0_25, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_28_0_25, the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_0_10_10, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (93) all_28_0_25 = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_13_13, all_28_0_25, all_30_0_27 and discharging atoms the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_30_0_27, the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_28_0_25, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (94) all_30_0_27 = all_28_0_25
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_13_13, all_26_3_23, all_30_0_27 and discharging atoms the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_30_0_27, the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_26_3_23, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (95) all_30_0_27 = all_26_3_23
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_13_13, all_17_0_17, all_41_1_33 and discharging atoms the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_41_1_33, the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_17_0_17, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (96) all_41_1_33 = all_17_0_17
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (52) with all_0_13_13, all_14_0_16, all_41_1_33 and discharging atoms the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_41_1_33, the_carrier(all_0_13_13) = all_14_0_16, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (97) all_41_1_33 = all_14_0_16
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (40) with empty_set, all_41_0_32, 0 and discharging atoms empty(empty_set) = 0, yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (98) all_41_0_32 = 0 |  ~ (empty(empty_set) = all_41_0_32)
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Instantiating formula (22) with all_41_1_33 yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (99) all_41_1_33 = empty_set |  ~ (empty(all_41_1_33) = 0)
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Combining equations (92,96) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (100) all_30_0_27 = all_17_0_17
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Simplifying 100 yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (101) all_30_0_27 = all_17_0_17
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Combining equations (97,96) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (102) all_17_0_17 = all_14_0_16
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Combining equations (94,95) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (103) all_28_0_25 = all_26_3_23
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Simplifying 103 yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (104) all_28_0_25 = all_26_3_23
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Combining equations (101,95) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (105) all_26_3_23 = all_17_0_17
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Combining equations (91,90) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (106) all_28_1_26 = all_26_4_24
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Combining equations (89,90) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (107) all_28_1_26 = 0
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Combining equations (104,93) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (108) all_26_3_23 = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Simplifying 108 yields:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (109) all_26_3_23 = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Combining equations (106,107) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.88  	| (110) all_26_4_24 = 0
% 58.09/16.88  	|
% 58.09/16.88  	| Simplifying 110 yields:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (111) all_26_4_24 = 0
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	| Combining equations (105,109) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (112) all_17_0_17 = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	| Simplifying 112 yields:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (113) all_17_0_17 = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	| Combining equations (113,102) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (114) all_14_0_16 = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	| Combining equations (114,102) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (113) all_17_0_17 = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	| Combining equations (107,90) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (89) all_30_1_28 = 0
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	| Combining equations (109,95) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (117) all_30_0_27 = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	| Combining equations (113,96) yields a new equation:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (118) all_41_1_33 = all_0_10_10
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	| From (111) and (69) follows:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (34) rel_str(all_0_13_13) = 0
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	| From (118) and (87) follows:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (120) empty(all_0_10_10) = all_41_0_32
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (71), into two cases.
% 58.09/16.89  	|-Branch one:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (121)  ~ (all_26_4_24 = 0)
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  		| Equations (111) can reduce 121 to:
% 58.09/16.89  		| (81) $false
% 58.09/16.89  		|
% 58.09/16.89  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.09/16.89  	|-Branch two:
% 58.09/16.89  	| (111) all_26_4_24 = 0
% 58.09/16.89  	| (124) all_26_0_20 = 0 & all_26_1_21 = 0 & element(all_26_2_22, all_26_3_23) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_26_3_23, all_26_2_22) = 0
% 58.09/16.89  	|
% 58.09/16.89  		| Applying alpha-rule on (124) yields:
% 58.09/16.89  		| (125) all_26_0_20 = 0
% 58.09/16.89  		| (126) all_26_1_21 = 0
% 58.09/16.89  		| (127) element(all_26_2_22, all_26_3_23) = 0
% 58.09/16.89  		| (128) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_26_3_23, all_26_2_22) = 0
% 58.09/16.89  		|
% 58.09/16.89  		| From (109) and (127) follows:
% 58.09/16.89  		| (129) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.09/16.89  		|
% 58.09/16.89  		| From (109) and (128) follows:
% 58.09/16.89  		| (130) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0
% 58.09/16.89  		|
% 58.09/16.89  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (75), into two cases.
% 58.09/16.89  		|-Branch one:
% 58.09/16.89  		| (131)  ~ (all_28_1_26 = 0)
% 58.09/16.89  		|
% 58.09/16.89  			| Equations (107) can reduce 131 to:
% 58.09/16.89  			| (81) $false
% 58.09/16.89  			|
% 58.09/16.89  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.09/16.89  		|-Branch two:
% 58.09/16.89  		| (107) all_28_1_26 = 0
% 58.09/16.89  		| (134)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v3) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, v2, v3) = v6 & element(v3, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0 & element(v1, all_28_0_25) = 0 &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3 & related(all_0_13_13, v1, v2) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))))
% 58.09/16.89  		|
% 58.09/16.89  			| Applying alpha-rule on (134) yields:
% 58.09/16.89  			| (135)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v3) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, v2, v3) = v6 & element(v3, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3)))
% 58.47/16.90  			| (136)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0 & element(v1, all_28_0_25) = 0 &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3 & related(all_0_13_13, v1, v2) = v4 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))))
% 58.47/16.90  			|
% 58.47/16.90  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (79), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.90  			|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.90  			| (137)  ~ (all_30_1_28 = 0)
% 58.47/16.90  			|
% 58.47/16.90  				| Equations (89) can reduce 137 to:
% 58.47/16.90  				| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.90  				|
% 58.47/16.90  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.90  			|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.90  			| (89) all_30_1_28 = 0
% 58.47/16.90  			| (140)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v3, v2) = v6 & element(v3, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (element(v1, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (related(all_0_13_13, v2, v1) = v4 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))))
% 58.47/16.90  			|
% 58.47/16.90  				| Applying alpha-rule on (140) yields:
% 58.47/16.90  				| (141)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = v1) |  ~ (element(v2, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v5 = 0 & v4 = 0 &  ~ (v6 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v3, v2) = v6 & element(v3, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v3) = 0) | ( ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3)))
% 58.47/16.90  				| (142)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, v0) = 0) |  ? [v1] : (element(v1, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v1) = 0 &  ! [v2] : ( ~ (element(v2, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (related(all_0_13_13, v2, v1) = v4 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, v0, v2) = v3 & ( ~ (v3 = 0) | v4 = 0)))))
% 58.47/16.90  				|
% 58.47/16.90  				| Instantiating formula (142) with all_0_10_10 yields:
% 58.47/16.90  				| (143)  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10) = 0) |  ? [v0] : (element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (element(v1, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (related(all_0_13_13, v1, v0) = v3 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0))))
% 58.47/16.91  				|
% 58.47/16.91  				| Instantiating formula (46) with all_41_2_34, all_0_13_13 and discharging atoms one_sorted_str(all_0_13_13) = all_41_2_34, yields:
% 58.47/16.91  				| (144) all_41_2_34 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & rel_str(all_0_13_13) = v0)
% 58.47/16.91  				|
% 58.47/16.91  				| Instantiating formula (141) with all_26_2_22, all_0_9_9, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10) = all_0_9_9, yields:
% 58.47/16.91  				| (145) all_0_9_9 = 0 |  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v0, all_26_2_22) = v3 & element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = v0))
% 58.47/16.91  				|
% 58.47/16.91  				| Instantiating formula (135) with all_26_2_22, all_0_11_11, empty_set and discharging atoms ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, empty_set) = all_0_11_11, yields:
% 58.47/16.91  				| (146) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = v0))
% 58.47/16.91  				|
% 58.47/16.91  				| Instantiating formula (67) with all_26_2_22, all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.91  				| (147)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_26_2_22) = v1 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.91  				|
% 58.47/16.91  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (144), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.91  				|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.91  				| (148) all_41_2_34 = 0
% 58.47/16.91  				|
% 58.47/16.91  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.91  					|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.91  					| (149)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.91  					|
% 58.47/16.91  						| From (113) and (149) follows:
% 58.47/16.91  						| (150)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.91  						|
% 58.47/16.91  						| Using (129) and (150) yields:
% 58.47/16.91  						| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.91  						|
% 58.47/16.91  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.91  					|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.91  					| (152) element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.91  					| (153)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_26_2_22) = v1 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.91  					|
% 58.47/16.91  						| Instantiating (153) with all_78_0_35, all_78_1_36 yields:
% 58.47/16.91  						| (154) ( ~ (all_78_1_36 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = all_78_1_36) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_26_2_22) = all_78_0_35 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_78_1_36 & ( ~ (all_78_1_36 = 0) | all_78_0_35 = 0))
% 58.47/16.91  						|
% 58.47/16.91  						| From (113) and (152) follows:
% 58.47/16.91  						| (129) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.91  						|
% 58.47/16.91  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (88), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.91  						|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.91  						| (156)  ~ (all_41_0_32 = 0)
% 58.47/16.91  						|
% 58.47/16.91  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (154), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.91  							|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.91  							| (157)  ~ (all_78_1_36 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = all_78_1_36
% 58.47/16.91  							|
% 58.47/16.91  								| Applying alpha-rule on (157) yields:
% 58.47/16.91  								| (158)  ~ (all_78_1_36 = 0)
% 58.47/16.91  								| (159) element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = all_78_1_36
% 58.47/16.91  								|
% 58.47/16.91  								| From (113) and (159) follows:
% 58.47/16.91  								| (160) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_78_1_36
% 58.47/16.91  								|
% 58.47/16.91  								| Instantiating formula (11) with all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10, all_78_1_36, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_78_1_36, element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.91  								| (161) all_78_1_36 = 0
% 58.47/16.91  								|
% 58.47/16.91  								| Equations (161) can reduce 158 to:
% 58.47/16.92  								| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.92  								|
% 58.47/16.92  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.92  							|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.92  							| (163) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_26_2_22) = all_78_0_35 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_78_1_36 & ( ~ (all_78_1_36 = 0) | all_78_0_35 = 0)
% 58.47/16.92  							|
% 58.47/16.92  								| Applying alpha-rule on (163) yields:
% 58.47/16.92  								| (164) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_26_2_22) = all_78_0_35
% 58.47/16.92  								| (165) in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_78_1_36
% 58.47/16.92  								| (166)  ~ (all_78_1_36 = 0) | all_78_0_35 = 0
% 58.47/16.92  								|
% 58.47/16.92  								| Instantiating formula (50) with all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22 yields:
% 58.47/16.92  								| (167)  ~ (in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0) |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & in(all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = v0)
% 58.47/16.92  								|
% 58.47/16.92  								| Instantiating formula (33) with all_78_1_36, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22 and discharging atoms in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_78_1_36, yields:
% 58.47/16.92  								| (168) all_78_1_36 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & empty(all_0_10_10) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.92  								|
% 58.47/16.92  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (168), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.92  								|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.92  								| (161) all_78_1_36 = 0
% 58.47/16.92  								|
% 58.47/16.92  									| From (161) and (165) follows:
% 58.47/16.92  									| (170) in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.92  									|
% 58.47/16.92  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (167), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.92  									|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.92  									| (171)  ~ (in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.92  									|
% 58.47/16.92  										| Using (170) and (171) yields:
% 58.47/16.92  										| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.92  										|
% 58.47/16.92  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.92  									|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.92  									| (170) in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.92  									| (174)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & in(all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = v0)
% 58.47/16.92  									|
% 58.47/16.92  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (31), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.92  										|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.92  										| (175)  ~ (all_0_9_9 = 0)
% 58.47/16.92  										|
% 58.47/16.92  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (145), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.92  											|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.92  											| (176)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.47/16.92  											|
% 58.47/16.92  												| From (117) and (176) follows:
% 58.47/16.92  												| (150)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.92  												|
% 58.47/16.92  												| Using (129) and (150) yields:
% 58.47/16.92  												| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.92  												|
% 58.47/16.92  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.92  											|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.92  											| (179) element(all_26_2_22, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.92  											| (180) all_0_9_9 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v0, all_26_2_22) = v3 & element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = v0))
% 58.47/16.92  											|
% 58.47/16.92  												| From (117) and (179) follows:
% 58.47/16.92  												| (129) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.92  												|
% 58.47/16.92  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (180), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.92  												|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.92  												| (182) all_0_9_9 = 0
% 58.47/16.92  												|
% 58.47/16.92  													| Equations (182) can reduce 175 to:
% 58.47/16.92  													| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.92  													|
% 58.47/16.92  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.92  												|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.92  												| (175)  ~ (all_0_9_9 = 0)
% 58.47/16.92  												| (185)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v0, all_26_2_22) = v3 & element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = v0))
% 58.47/16.92  												|
% 58.47/16.92  													| Instantiating (185) with all_136_0_40, all_136_1_41, all_136_2_42, all_136_3_43 yields:
% 58.47/16.92  													| (186) (all_136_1_41 = 0 & all_136_2_42 = 0 &  ~ (all_136_0_40 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = all_136_0_40 & element(all_136_3_43, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_136_3_43) = 0) | ( ~ (all_136_3_43 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_136_3_43)
% 58.47/16.92  													|
% 58.47/16.92  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (186), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.92  													|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.92  													| (187) all_136_1_41 = 0 & all_136_2_42 = 0 &  ~ (all_136_0_40 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = all_136_0_40 & element(all_136_3_43, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_136_3_43) = 0
% 58.47/16.92  													|
% 58.47/16.92  														| Applying alpha-rule on (187) yields:
% 58.47/16.92  														| (188) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_136_3_43) = 0
% 58.47/16.92  														| (189) related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = all_136_0_40
% 58.47/16.92  														| (190) all_136_1_41 = 0
% 58.47/16.92  														| (191) all_136_2_42 = 0
% 58.47/16.92  														| (192) element(all_136_3_43, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.92  														| (193)  ~ (all_136_0_40 = 0)
% 58.47/16.92  														|
% 58.47/16.92  														| From (117) and (192) follows:
% 58.47/16.92  														| (194) element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.92  														|
% 58.47/16.92  														| Instantiating formula (141) with all_136_3_43, all_0_9_9, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10) = all_0_9_9, yields:
% 58.47/16.92  														| (195) all_0_9_9 = 0 |  ~ (element(all_136_3_43, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v0, all_136_3_43) = v3 & element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_136_3_43) = v0))
% 58.47/16.93  														|
% 58.47/16.93  														| Instantiating formula (67) with all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.93  														| (196)  ~ (element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_136_3_43) = v1 & in(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.93  														|
% 58.47/16.93  														| Instantiating formula (67) with all_26_2_22, all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_136_3_43) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.93  														| (197)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = v1 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.93  														|
% 58.47/16.93  														| Instantiating formula (67) with all_136_3_43, all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_136_3_43) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.93  														| (198)  ~ (element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_136_3_43) = v1 & in(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.93  														|
% 58.47/16.93  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (197), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.93  														|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.93  														| (149)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  														|
% 58.47/16.93  															| From (113) and (149) follows:
% 58.47/16.93  															| (150)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  															|
% 58.47/16.93  															| Using (129) and (150) yields:
% 58.47/16.93  															| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.93  															|
% 58.47/16.93  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.93  														|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.93  														| (152) element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.93  														| (203)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = v1 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.93  														|
% 58.47/16.93  															| Instantiating (203) with all_184_0_44, all_184_1_45 yields:
% 58.47/16.93  															| (204) ( ~ (all_184_1_45 = 0) & element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = all_184_1_45) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = all_184_0_44 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_184_1_45 & ( ~ (all_184_1_45 = 0) | all_184_0_44 = 0))
% 58.47/16.93  															|
% 58.47/16.93  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (198), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.93  															|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.93  															| (205)  ~ (element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  															|
% 58.47/16.93  																| From (113) and (205) follows:
% 58.47/16.93  																| (206)  ~ (element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  																|
% 58.47/16.93  																| Using (194) and (206) yields:
% 58.47/16.93  																| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.93  																|
% 58.47/16.93  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.93  															|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.93  															| (208) element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.93  															| (209)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_136_3_43) = v1 & in(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.93  															|
% 58.47/16.93  																| From (113) and (208) follows:
% 58.47/16.93  																| (194) element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.93  																|
% 58.47/16.93  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.93  																|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.93  																| (211)  ~ (all_184_1_45 = 0) & element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = all_184_1_45
% 58.47/16.93  																|
% 58.47/16.93  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (211) yields:
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (212)  ~ (all_184_1_45 = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (213) element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = all_184_1_45
% 58.47/16.93  																	|
% 58.47/16.93  																	| From (113) and (213) follows:
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (214) element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = all_184_1_45
% 58.47/16.93  																	|
% 58.47/16.93  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (196), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.93  																	|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (205)  ~ (element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  																	|
% 58.47/16.93  																		| From (113) and (205) follows:
% 58.47/16.93  																		| (206)  ~ (element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  																		|
% 58.47/16.93  																		| Using (194) and (206) yields:
% 58.47/16.93  																		| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.93  																		|
% 58.47/16.93  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.93  																	|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (208) element(all_136_3_43, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (219)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_136_3_43) = v1 & in(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.93  																	|
% 58.47/16.93  																		| From (113) and (208) follows:
% 58.47/16.93  																		| (194) element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.93  																		|
% 58.47/16.93  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (195), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.93  																		|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.93  																		| (221)  ~ (element(all_136_3_43, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  																		|
% 58.47/16.93  																			| From (117) and (221) follows:
% 58.47/16.93  																			| (206)  ~ (element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  																			|
% 58.47/16.93  																			| Using (194) and (206) yields:
% 58.47/16.93  																			| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.93  																			|
% 58.47/16.93  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.93  																		|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.93  																		| (192) element(all_136_3_43, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.93  																		| (225) all_0_9_9 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & related(all_0_13_13, v0, all_136_3_43) = v3 & element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_136_3_43) = v0))
% 58.47/16.93  																		|
% 58.47/16.93  																			| From (117) and (192) follows:
% 58.47/16.93  																			| (194) element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.93  																			|
% 58.47/16.93  																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10, all_184_1_45, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = all_184_1_45, element(all_136_3_43, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.93  																			| (227) all_184_1_45 = 0
% 58.47/16.93  																			|
% 58.47/16.93  																			| Equations (227) can reduce 212 to:
% 58.47/16.93  																			| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.93  																			|
% 58.47/16.93  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.93  																|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.93  																| (229) related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = all_184_0_44 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_184_1_45 & ( ~ (all_184_1_45 = 0) | all_184_0_44 = 0)
% 58.47/16.93  																|
% 58.47/16.93  																	| Applying alpha-rule on (229) yields:
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (230) related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = all_184_0_44
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (231) in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_184_1_45
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (232)  ~ (all_184_1_45 = 0) | all_184_0_44 = 0
% 58.47/16.93  																	|
% 58.47/16.93  																	| Instantiating formula (21) with all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22, all_184_0_44, all_136_0_40 and discharging atoms related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = all_184_0_44, related(all_0_13_13, all_136_3_43, all_26_2_22) = all_136_0_40, yields:
% 58.47/16.93  																	| (233) all_184_0_44 = all_136_0_40
% 58.47/16.94  																	|
% 58.47/16.94  																	| Instantiating formula (27) with all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10, all_184_1_45, 0 and discharging atoms in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_184_1_45, in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.94  																	| (227) all_184_1_45 = 0
% 58.47/16.94  																	|
% 58.47/16.94  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (232), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.94  																	|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.94  																	| (212)  ~ (all_184_1_45 = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  																	|
% 58.47/16.94  																		| Equations (227) can reduce 212 to:
% 58.47/16.94  																		| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.94  																		|
% 58.47/16.94  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.94  																	|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.94  																	| (227) all_184_1_45 = 0
% 58.47/16.94  																	| (238) all_184_0_44 = 0
% 58.47/16.94  																	|
% 58.47/16.94  																		| Combining equations (238,233) yields a new equation:
% 58.47/16.94  																		| (239) all_136_0_40 = 0
% 58.47/16.94  																		|
% 58.47/16.94  																		| Equations (239) can reduce 193 to:
% 58.47/16.94  																		| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.94  																		|
% 58.47/16.94  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.94  													|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.94  													| (241)  ~ (all_136_3_43 = 0) & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_136_3_43
% 58.47/16.94  													|
% 58.47/16.94  														| Applying alpha-rule on (241) yields:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (242)  ~ (all_136_3_43 = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  														| (243) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_136_3_43
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  														| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22, all_136_3_43, 0 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_136_3_43, relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (244) all_136_3_43 = 0
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  														| Equations (244) can reduce 242 to:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.94  										|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.94  										| (182) all_0_9_9 = 0
% 58.47/16.94  										| (247)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  										|
% 58.47/16.94  											| From (182) and (9) follows:
% 58.47/16.94  											| (248) ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.94  											|
% 58.47/16.94  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (143), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.94  											|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.94  											| (249)  ~ (ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  											|
% 58.47/16.94  												| Using (248) and (249) yields:
% 58.47/16.94  												| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.94  												|
% 58.47/16.94  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.94  											|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.94  											| (248) ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.94  											| (252)  ? [v0] : (element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (element(v1, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (related(all_0_13_13, v1, v0) = v3 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0))))
% 58.47/16.94  											|
% 58.47/16.94  												| Instantiating (252) with all_127_0_70 yields:
% 58.47/16.94  												| (253) element(all_127_0_70, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = 0 &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (related(all_0_13_13, v0, all_127_0_70) = v2 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.94  												|
% 58.47/16.94  												| Applying alpha-rule on (253) yields:
% 58.47/16.94  												| (254) element(all_127_0_70, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.94  												| (255) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = 0
% 58.47/16.94  												| (256)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (related(all_0_13_13, v0, all_127_0_70) = v2 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.94  												|
% 58.47/16.94  												| Instantiating formula (256) with all_26_2_22 yields:
% 58.47/16.94  												| (257)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.94  												|
% 58.47/16.94  												| From (117) and (254) follows:
% 58.47/16.94  												| (258) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.94  												|
% 58.47/16.94  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (146), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.94  												|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.94  												| (259)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_28_0_25) = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  												|
% 58.47/16.94  													| From (93) and (259) follows:
% 58.47/16.94  													| (150)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  													|
% 58.47/16.94  													| Using (129) and (150) yields:
% 58.47/16.94  													| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.94  													|
% 58.47/16.94  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.94  												|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.94  												| (262) element(all_26_2_22, all_28_0_25) = 0
% 58.47/16.94  												| (263) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = v0))
% 58.47/16.94  												|
% 58.47/16.94  													| From (93) and (262) follows:
% 58.47/16.94  													| (129) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.94  													|
% 58.47/16.94  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (257), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.94  													|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.94  													| (176)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  													|
% 58.47/16.94  														| From (117) and (176) follows:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (150)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  														| Using (129) and (150) yields:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.94  													|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.94  													| (179) element(all_26_2_22, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.94  													| (269)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.94  													|
% 58.47/16.94  														| Instantiating (269) with all_142_0_73, all_142_1_74 yields:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (270) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_127_0_70) = all_142_0_73 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_142_1_74 & ( ~ (all_142_1_74 = 0) | all_142_0_73 = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  														| Applying alpha-rule on (270) yields:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (271) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_127_0_70) = all_142_0_73
% 58.47/16.94  														| (272) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_142_1_74
% 58.47/16.94  														| (273)  ~ (all_142_1_74 = 0) | all_142_0_73 = 0
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  														| From (117) and (179) follows:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (129) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (263), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.94  														|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (275) all_0_11_11 = 0
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  															| Equations (275) can reduce 247 to:
% 58.47/16.94  															| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.94  															|
% 58.47/16.94  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.94  														|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.94  														| (247)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = 0)
% 58.47/16.94  														| (278)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = v0))
% 58.47/16.94  														|
% 58.47/16.94  															| Instantiating (278) with all_148_0_75, all_148_1_76, all_148_2_77, all_148_3_78 yields:
% 58.47/16.94  															| (279) (all_148_1_76 = 0 & all_148_2_77 = 0 &  ~ (all_148_0_75 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = all_148_0_75 & element(all_148_3_78, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (all_148_3_78 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = all_148_3_78)
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22, all_142_1_74, 0 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_142_1_74, relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (280) all_142_1_74 = 0
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| From (280) and (272) follows:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (130) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating formula (142) with all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms ex_inf_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (252)  ? [v0] : (element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = 0 &  ! [v1] : ( ~ (element(v1, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (related(all_0_13_13, v1, v0) = v3 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v1) = v2 & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | v3 = 0))))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating formula (256) with all_127_0_70 yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (283)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating formula (135) with all_127_0_70, all_0_11_11, empty_set and discharging atoms ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, empty_set) = all_0_11_11, yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (284) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = v0))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating formula (67) with all_127_0_70, all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (285)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_127_0_70) = v1 & in(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating formula (67) with all_26_2_22, all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (286)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_26_2_22) = v1 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating formula (67) with all_127_0_70, all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (287)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_127_0_70) = v1 & in(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating (252) with all_194_0_79 yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (288) element(all_194_0_79, all_30_0_27) = 0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0 &  ! [v0] : ( ~ (element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (related(all_0_13_13, v0, all_194_0_79) = v2 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Applying alpha-rule on (288) yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (289) element(all_194_0_79, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  															| (290) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  															| (291)  ! [v0] : ( ~ (element(v0, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : (related(all_0_13_13, v0, all_194_0_79) = v2 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, v0) = v1 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | v2 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating formula (291) with all_127_0_70 yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (292)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| Instantiating formula (291) with all_26_2_22 yields:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (293)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															| From (117) and (289) follows:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (294) element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (286), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.95  															|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (149)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  																| From (113) and (149) follows:
% 58.47/16.95  																| (150)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.95  																|
% 58.47/16.95  																| Using (129) and (150) yields:
% 58.47/16.95  																| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.95  																|
% 58.47/16.95  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.95  															|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.95  															| (152) element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  															| (299)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_26_2_22) = v1 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.95  															|
% 58.47/16.95  																| From (113) and (152) follows:
% 58.47/16.95  																| (129) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  																|
% 58.47/16.95  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (287), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.95  																|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.95  																| (301)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.95  																|
% 58.47/16.95  																	| From (113) and (301) follows:
% 58.47/16.95  																	| (302)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.95  																	|
% 58.47/16.95  																	| Using (258) and (302) yields:
% 58.47/16.95  																	| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.95  																	|
% 58.47/16.95  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.95  																|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.95  																| (304) element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  																| (305)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_127_0_70) = v1 & in(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.95  																|
% 58.47/16.95  																	| From (113) and (304) follows:
% 58.47/16.95  																	| (258) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  																	|
% 58.47/16.95  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (285), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.95  																	|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.95  																	| (301)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.95  																	|
% 58.47/16.95  																		| From (113) and (301) follows:
% 58.47/16.95  																		| (302)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.95  																		|
% 58.47/16.95  																		| Using (258) and (302) yields:
% 58.47/16.95  																		| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.95  																		|
% 58.47/16.95  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.95  																	|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.95  																	| (304) element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  																	| (311)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_127_0_70) = v1 & in(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.95  																	|
% 58.47/16.95  																		| From (113) and (304) follows:
% 58.47/16.95  																		| (258) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.95  																		|
% 58.47/16.95  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (284), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.95  																		|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.95  																		| (313)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_28_0_25) = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																		|
% 58.47/16.96  																			| From (93) and (313) follows:
% 58.47/16.96  																			| (302)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																			|
% 58.47/16.96  																			| Using (258) and (302) yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																			| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.96  																			|
% 58.47/16.96  																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.96  																		|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.96  																		| (316) element(all_127_0_70, all_28_0_25) = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																		| (317) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = v0))
% 58.47/16.96  																		|
% 58.47/16.96  																			| From (93) and (316) follows:
% 58.47/16.96  																			| (258) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																			|
% 58.47/16.96  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (317), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.96  																			|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.96  																			| (275) all_0_11_11 = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																			|
% 58.47/16.96  																				| Equations (275) can reduce 247 to:
% 58.47/16.96  																				| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.96  																				|
% 58.47/16.96  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.96  																			|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.96  																			| (247)  ~ (all_0_11_11 = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																			| (322)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = v0))
% 58.47/16.96  																			|
% 58.47/16.96  																				| Instantiating (322) with all_220_0_102, all_220_1_103, all_220_2_104, all_220_3_105 yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																				| (323) (all_220_1_103 = 0 & all_220_2_104 = 0 &  ~ (all_220_0_102 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = all_220_0_102 & element(all_220_3_105, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (all_220_3_105 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = all_220_3_105)
% 58.47/16.96  																				|
% 58.47/16.96  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (293), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.96  																				|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.96  																				| (176)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																				|
% 58.47/16.96  																					| From (117) and (176) follows:
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (150)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																					|
% 58.47/16.96  																					| Using (129) and (150) yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.96  																					|
% 58.47/16.96  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.96  																				|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.96  																				| (179) element(all_26_2_22, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																				| (328)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.96  																				|
% 58.47/16.96  																					| Instantiating (328) with all_225_0_106, all_225_1_107 yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (329) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_194_0_79) = all_225_0_106 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_225_1_107 & ( ~ (all_225_1_107 = 0) | all_225_0_106 = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																					|
% 58.47/16.96  																					| Applying alpha-rule on (329) yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (330) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_194_0_79) = all_225_0_106
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (331) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_225_1_107
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (332)  ~ (all_225_1_107 = 0) | all_225_0_106 = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																					|
% 58.47/16.96  																					| From (117) and (179) follows:
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (129) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																					|
% 58.47/16.96  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (283), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.96  																					|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (334)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																					|
% 58.47/16.96  																						| From (117) and (334) follows:
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (302)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																						|
% 58.47/16.96  																						| Using (258) and (302) yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.96  																						|
% 58.47/16.96  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.96  																					|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (254) element(all_127_0_70, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																					| (338)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.96  																					|
% 58.47/16.96  																						| Instantiating (338) with all_235_0_112, all_235_1_113 yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (339) related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_127_0_70) = all_235_0_112 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = all_235_1_113 & ( ~ (all_235_1_113 = 0) | all_235_0_112 = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																						|
% 58.47/16.96  																						| Applying alpha-rule on (339) yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (340) related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_127_0_70) = all_235_0_112
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (341) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = all_235_1_113
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (342)  ~ (all_235_1_113 = 0) | all_235_0_112 = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																						|
% 58.47/16.96  																						| From (117) and (254) follows:
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (258) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																						|
% 58.47/16.96  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (292), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.96  																						|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (334)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																						|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| From (117) and (334) follows:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (302)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| Using (258) and (302) yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.96  																						|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (254) element(all_127_0_70, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																						| (348)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.96  																						|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| Instantiating (348) with all_245_0_116, all_245_1_117 yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (349) related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_194_0_79) = all_245_0_116 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = all_245_1_117 & ( ~ (all_245_1_117 = 0) | all_245_0_116 = 0)
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| Applying alpha-rule on (349) yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (350) related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_194_0_79) = all_245_0_116
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (351) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = all_245_1_117
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (352)  ~ (all_245_1_117 = 0) | all_245_0_116 = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| From (117) and (254) follows:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (258) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70, all_245_1_117, 0 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = all_245_1_117, relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (354) all_245_1_117 = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22, all_245_1_117, 0 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (355) all_245_1_117 = 0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_245_1_117)
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22, all_235_1_113, 0 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (356) all_235_1_113 = 0 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_235_1_113)
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70, all_235_1_113, all_245_1_117 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = all_245_1_117, relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = all_235_1_113, yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (357) all_245_1_117 = all_235_1_113
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22, all_225_1_107, 0 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_225_1_107, relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (358) all_225_1_107 = 0
% 58.47/16.96  																							|
% 58.47/16.96  																							| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22, all_225_1_107, all_245_1_117 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_225_1_107, yields:
% 58.47/16.96  																							| (359) all_245_1_117 = all_225_1_107 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_245_1_117)
% 58.47/16.97  																							|
% 58.47/16.97  																							| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22, all_225_1_107, all_235_1_113 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_225_1_107, yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																							| (360) all_235_1_113 = all_225_1_107 |  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_235_1_113)
% 58.47/16.97  																							|
% 58.47/16.97  																							| Combining equations (354,357) yields a new equation:
% 58.47/16.97  																							| (361) all_235_1_113 = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																							|
% 58.47/16.97  																							| Combining equations (361,357) yields a new equation:
% 58.47/16.97  																							| (354) all_245_1_117 = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																							|
% 58.47/16.97  																							| From (361) and (341) follows:
% 58.47/16.97  																							| (255) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																							|
% 58.47/16.97  																							| From (358) and (331) follows:
% 58.47/16.97  																							| (130) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																							|
% 58.47/16.97  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (342), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.97  																							|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.97  																							| (365)  ~ (all_235_1_113 = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																							|
% 58.47/16.97  																								| Equations (361) can reduce 365 to:
% 58.47/16.97  																								| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.97  																								|
% 58.47/16.97  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.97  																							|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.97  																							| (361) all_235_1_113 = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																							| (368) all_235_0_112 = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																							|
% 58.47/16.97  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (352), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.97  																								|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.97  																								| (369)  ~ (all_245_1_117 = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																								|
% 58.47/16.97  																									| Equations (354) can reduce 369 to:
% 58.47/16.97  																									| (81) $false
% 58.47/16.97  																									|
% 58.47/16.97  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.97  																								|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.97  																								| (354) all_245_1_117 = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																								| (372) all_245_0_116 = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																								|
% 58.47/16.97  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (98), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.97  																									|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.97  																									| (373)  ~ (empty(empty_set) = all_41_0_32)
% 58.47/16.97  																									|
% 58.47/16.97  																										| Using (120) and (373) yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																										| (374)  ~ (all_0_10_10 = empty_set)
% 58.47/16.97  																										|
% 58.47/16.97  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (99), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.97  																										|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.97  																										| (375)  ~ (empty(all_41_1_33) = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																										|
% 58.47/16.97  																											| From (118) and (375) follows:
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (376)  ~ (empty(all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																											|
% 58.47/16.97  																											| Instantiating formula (291) with all_194_0_79 yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (377)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.97  																											|
% 58.47/16.97  																											| Instantiating formula (256) with all_194_0_79 yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (378)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.97  																											|
% 58.47/16.97  																											| Instantiating formula (135) with all_194_0_79, all_0_11_11, empty_set and discharging atoms ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, empty_set) = all_0_11_11, yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (379) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_194_0_79) = v0))
% 58.47/16.97  																											|
% 58.47/16.97  																											| Instantiating formula (67) with all_127_0_70, all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (380)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_127_0_70) = v1 & in(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.97  																											|
% 58.47/16.97  																											| Instantiating formula (67) with all_26_2_22, all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (381)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_26_2_22) = v1 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.97  																											|
% 58.47/16.97  																											| Instantiating formula (67) with all_194_0_79, all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (382)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_194_0_79) = v1 & in(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.97  																											|
% 58.47/16.97  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (381), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.97  																											|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (149)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																											|
% 58.47/16.97  																												| From (113) and (149) follows:
% 58.47/16.97  																												| (150)  ~ (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																												|
% 58.47/16.97  																												| Using (129) and (150) yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																												| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.97  																												|
% 58.47/16.97  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.97  																											|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (152) element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																											| (387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_26_2_22) = v1 & in(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.97  																											|
% 58.47/16.97  																												| From (113) and (152) follows:
% 58.47/16.97  																												| (129) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																												|
% 58.47/16.97  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (382), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.97  																												|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.97  																												| (389)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																												|
% 58.47/16.97  																													| From (113) and (389) follows:
% 58.47/16.97  																													| (390)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																													|
% 58.47/16.97  																													| Using (294) and (390) yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																													| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.97  																													|
% 58.47/16.97  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.97  																												|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.97  																												| (392) element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																												| (393)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_194_0_79) = v1 & in(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.97  																												|
% 58.47/16.97  																													| From (113) and (392) follows:
% 58.47/16.97  																													| (294) element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																													|
% 58.47/16.97  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (380), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.97  																													|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.97  																													| (301)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																													|
% 58.47/16.97  																														| From (113) and (301) follows:
% 58.47/16.97  																														| (302)  ~ (element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.97  																														|
% 58.47/16.97  																														| Using (258) and (302) yields:
% 58.47/16.97  																														| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.97  																														|
% 58.47/16.97  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.97  																													|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.97  																													| (304) element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.47/16.97  																													| (399)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_127_0_70) = v1 & in(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.47/16.97  																													|
% 58.47/16.97  																														| From (113) and (304) follows:
% 58.47/16.97  																														| (258) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.98  																														|
% 58.47/16.98  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (378), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.98  																														|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.98  																														| (401)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.47/16.98  																														|
% 58.47/16.98  																															| From (117) and (401) follows:
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (390)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.98  																															|
% 58.47/16.98  																															| Using (294) and (390) yields:
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.98  																															|
% 58.47/16.98  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.98  																														|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.98  																														| (289) element(all_194_0_79, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.47/16.98  																														| (405)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.47/16.98  																														|
% 58.47/16.98  																															| Instantiating (405) with all_575_0_157, all_575_1_158 yields:
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (406) related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_127_0_70) = all_575_0_157 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = all_575_1_158 & ( ~ (all_575_1_158 = 0) | all_575_0_157 = 0)
% 58.47/16.98  																															|
% 58.47/16.98  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (406) yields:
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (407) related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_127_0_70) = all_575_0_157
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (408) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = all_575_1_158
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (409)  ~ (all_575_1_158 = 0) | all_575_0_157 = 0
% 58.47/16.98  																															|
% 58.47/16.98  																															| From (117) and (289) follows:
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (294) element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.98  																															|
% 58.47/16.98  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (379), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.98  																															|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (411)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_28_0_25) = 0)
% 58.47/16.98  																															|
% 58.47/16.98  																																| From (93) and (411) follows:
% 58.47/16.98  																																| (390)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.47/16.98  																																|
% 58.47/16.98  																																| Using (294) and (390) yields:
% 58.47/16.98  																																| (151) $false
% 58.47/16.98  																																|
% 58.47/16.98  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.47/16.98  																															|-Branch two:
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (414) element(all_194_0_79, all_28_0_25) = 0
% 58.47/16.98  																															| (415) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_194_0_79) = v0))
% 58.47/16.98  																															|
% 58.47/16.98  																																| From (93) and (414) follows:
% 58.47/16.98  																																| (294) element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.47/16.98  																																|
% 58.47/16.98  																																| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79, all_575_1_158, 0 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = all_575_1_158, relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0, yields:
% 58.47/16.98  																																| (417) all_575_1_158 = 0
% 58.47/16.98  																																|
% 58.47/16.98  																																| From (417) and (408) follows:
% 58.47/16.98  																																| (290) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0
% 58.47/16.98  																																|
% 58.47/16.98  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (377), into two cases.
% 58.47/16.98  																																|-Branch one:
% 58.47/16.98  																																| (401)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.47/16.98  																																|
% 58.47/16.98  																																	| From (117) and (401) follows:
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| (390)  ~ (element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.89/16.98  																																	|
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| Using (294) and (390) yields:
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| (151) $false
% 58.89/16.98  																																	|
% 58.89/16.98  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.89/16.98  																																|-Branch two:
% 58.89/16.98  																																| (289) element(all_194_0_79, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.89/16.98  																																| (423)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.89/16.98  																																|
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| Instantiating (423) with all_602_0_164, all_602_1_165 yields:
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| (424) related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_194_0_79) = all_602_0_164 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = all_602_1_165 & ( ~ (all_602_1_165 = 0) | all_602_0_164 = 0)
% 58.89/16.98  																																	|
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (424) yields:
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| (425) related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_194_0_79) = all_602_0_164
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| (426) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = all_602_1_165
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| (427)  ~ (all_602_1_165 = 0) | all_602_0_164 = 0
% 58.89/16.98  																																	|
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| From (117) and (289) follows:
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| (294) element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.89/16.98  																																	|
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| Instantiating formula (2) with all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79, all_602_1_165, 0 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = all_602_1_165, relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0, yields:
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| (429) all_602_1_165 = 0
% 58.89/16.98  																																	|
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| From (429) and (426) follows:
% 58.89/16.98  																																	| (290) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0
% 58.89/16.98  																																	|
% 58.89/16.98  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (279), into two cases.
% 58.89/16.98  																																	|-Branch one:
% 58.90/16.98  																																	| (431) all_148_1_76 = 0 & all_148_2_77 = 0 &  ~ (all_148_0_75 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = all_148_0_75 & element(all_148_3_78, all_28_0_25) = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																	|
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (431) yields:
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| (432) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = all_148_0_75
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| (433)  ~ (all_148_0_75 = 0)
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| (434) all_148_2_77 = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| (435) element(all_148_3_78, all_28_0_25) = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| (436) all_148_1_76 = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| (437) relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																		|
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| From (93) and (435) follows:
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| (438) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																		|
% 58.90/16.98  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (323), into two cases.
% 58.90/16.98  																																		|-Branch one:
% 58.90/16.98  																																		| (439) all_220_1_103 = 0 & all_220_2_104 = 0 &  ~ (all_220_0_102 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = all_220_0_102 & element(all_220_3_105, all_28_0_25) = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																		|
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (439) yields:
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| (440) all_220_1_103 = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| (441) relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| (442) related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = all_220_0_102
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| (443) all_220_2_104 = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| (444)  ~ (all_220_0_102 = 0)
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| (445) element(all_220_3_105, all_28_0_25) = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																			|
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| From (93) and (445) follows:
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.90/16.98  																																			|
% 58.90/16.98  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (360), into two cases.
% 58.90/16.98  																																			|-Branch one:
% 58.90/16.98  																																			| (447)  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_235_1_113)
% 58.90/16.98  																																			|
% 58.90/16.98  																																				| From (361) and (447) follows:
% 58.90/16.98  																																				| (448)  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0)
% 58.90/16.98  																																				|
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| Using (130) and (448) yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| (151) $false
% 58.90/16.99  																																				|
% 58.90/16.99  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.90/16.99  																																			|-Branch two:
% 58.90/16.99  																																			| (450) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_235_1_113
% 58.90/16.99  																																			| (451) all_235_1_113 = all_225_1_107
% 58.90/16.99  																																			|
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| Combining equations (361,451) yields a new equation:
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| (358) all_225_1_107 = 0
% 58.90/16.99  																																				|
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| Combining equations (358,451) yields a new equation:
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| (361) all_235_1_113 = 0
% 58.90/16.99  																																				|
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| From (361) and (450) follows:
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| (130) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0
% 58.90/16.99  																																				|
% 58.90/16.99  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (356), into two cases.
% 58.90/16.99  																																				|-Branch one:
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| (447)  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_235_1_113)
% 58.90/16.99  																																				|
% 58.90/16.99  																																					| From (361) and (447) follows:
% 58.90/16.99  																																					| (448)  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0)
% 58.90/16.99  																																					|
% 58.90/16.99  																																					| Using (130) and (448) yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																					| (151) $false
% 58.90/16.99  																																					|
% 58.90/16.99  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.90/16.99  																																				|-Branch two:
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| (450) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_235_1_113
% 58.90/16.99  																																				| (361) all_235_1_113 = 0
% 58.90/16.99  																																				|
% 58.90/16.99  																																					| From (361) and (450) follows:
% 58.90/16.99  																																					| (130) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0
% 58.90/16.99  																																					|
% 58.90/16.99  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (359), into two cases.
% 58.90/16.99  																																					|-Branch one:
% 58.90/16.99  																																					| (461)  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_245_1_117)
% 58.90/16.99  																																					|
% 58.90/16.99  																																						| From (354) and (461) follows:
% 58.90/16.99  																																						| (448)  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0)
% 58.90/16.99  																																						|
% 58.90/16.99  																																						| Using (130) and (448) yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																						| (151) $false
% 58.90/16.99  																																						|
% 58.90/16.99  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.90/16.99  																																					|-Branch two:
% 58.90/16.99  																																					| (464) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_245_1_117
% 58.90/16.99  																																					| (465) all_245_1_117 = all_225_1_107
% 58.90/16.99  																																					|
% 58.90/16.99  																																						| From (354) and (464) follows:
% 58.90/16.99  																																						| (130) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0
% 58.90/16.99  																																						|
% 58.90/16.99  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (355), into two cases.
% 58.90/16.99  																																						|-Branch one:
% 58.90/16.99  																																						| (461)  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_245_1_117)
% 58.90/16.99  																																						|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| From (354) and (461) follows:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (448)  ~ (relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0)
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Using (130) and (448) yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (151) $false
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.90/16.99  																																						|-Branch two:
% 58.90/16.99  																																						| (464) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = all_245_1_117
% 58.90/16.99  																																						| (354) all_245_1_117 = 0
% 58.90/16.99  																																						|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| From (354) and (464) follows:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (130) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (63) with 0, all_220_3_105 and discharging atoms relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = 0, yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (473)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_220_3_105, all_14_0_16) = v0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (63) with 0, all_148_3_78 and discharging atoms relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = 0, yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (474)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_148_3_78, all_14_0_16) = v0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (291) with all_220_3_105 yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (475)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_220_3_105, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_220_3_105) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (256) with all_220_3_105 yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (476)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_220_3_105, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_220_3_105) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (135) with all_220_3_105, all_0_11_11, empty_set and discharging atoms ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, empty_set) = all_0_11_11, yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (477) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_220_3_105, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = v0))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (67) with all_220_3_105, all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0, yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (478)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (67) with all_220_3_105, all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = 0, yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (479)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (67) with all_220_3_105, all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (480)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (291) with all_148_3_78 yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (481)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_148_3_78, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_148_3_78) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (256) with all_148_3_78 yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (482)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_30_0_27) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_148_3_78, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_148_3_78) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (135) with all_148_3_78, all_0_11_11, empty_set and discharging atoms ex_sup_of_relstr_set(all_0_13_13, empty_set) = all_0_11_11, yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (483) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_28_0_25) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_148_3_78, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = v0))
% 58.90/16.99  																																							|
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| Instantiating formula (67) with all_148_3_78, all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_194_0_79) = 0, yields:
% 58.90/16.99  																																							| (484)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_148_3_78) = v1 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.90/17.00  																																							|
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| Instantiating formula (67) with all_148_3_78, all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_127_0_70) = 0, yields:
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| (485)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_148_3_78) = v1 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.90/17.00  																																							|
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| Instantiating formula (67) with all_148_3_78, all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10 and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_26_2_22) = 0, yields:
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| (486)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = v1 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.90/17.00  																																							|
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| Instantiating (474) with all_841_0_166, all_841_1_167 yields:
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| (487) element(all_148_3_78, all_14_0_16) = all_841_1_167 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = all_841_0_166 & ( ~ (all_841_1_167 = 0) | all_841_0_166 = 0)
% 58.90/17.00  																																							|
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (487) yields:
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| (488) element(all_148_3_78, all_14_0_16) = all_841_1_167
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| (489) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = all_841_0_166
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| (490)  ~ (all_841_1_167 = 0) | all_841_0_166 = 0
% 58.90/17.00  																																							|
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| Instantiating (473) with all_843_0_168, all_843_1_169 yields:
% 58.90/17.00  																																							| (491) element(all_220_3_105, all_14_0_16) = all_843_1_169 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = all_843_0_168 & ( ~ (all_843_1_169 = 0) | all_843_0_168 = 0)
% 58.90/17.00  																																							|
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (491) yields:
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| (492) element(all_220_3_105, all_14_0_16) = all_843_1_169
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| (493) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = all_843_0_168
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| (494)  ~ (all_843_1_169 = 0) | all_843_0_168 = 0
% 58.96/17.00  																																							|
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| From (114) and (492) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| (495) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_843_1_169
% 58.96/17.00  																																							|
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| From (114) and (488) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| (496) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_841_1_167
% 58.96/17.00  																																							|
% 58.96/17.00  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (475), into two cases.
% 58.96/17.00  																																							|-Branch one:
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| (497)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																							|
% 58.96/17.00  																																								| From (117) and (497) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																								| (498)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																								|
% 58.96/17.00  																																								| Using (446) and (498) yields:
% 58.96/17.00  																																								| (151) $false
% 58.96/17.00  																																								|
% 58.96/17.00  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.96/17.00  																																							|-Branch two:
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| (500) element(all_220_3_105, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.96/17.00  																																							| (501)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_220_3_105, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_220_3_105) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.96/17.00  																																							|
% 58.96/17.00  																																								| From (117) and (500) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																								| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.96/17.00  																																								|
% 58.96/17.00  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (476), into two cases.
% 58.96/17.00  																																								|-Branch one:
% 58.96/17.00  																																								| (497)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																								|
% 58.96/17.00  																																									| From (117) and (497) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																									| (498)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																									|
% 58.96/17.00  																																									| Using (446) and (498) yields:
% 58.96/17.00  																																									| (151) $false
% 58.96/17.00  																																									|
% 58.96/17.00  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.96/17.00  																																								|-Branch two:
% 58.96/17.00  																																								| (500) element(all_220_3_105, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.96/17.00  																																								| (507)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_220_3_105, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_220_3_105) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.96/17.00  																																								|
% 58.96/17.00  																																									| From (117) and (500) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																									| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.96/17.00  																																									|
% 58.96/17.00  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 58.96/17.00  																																									|-Branch one:
% 58.96/17.00  																																									| (509)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																									|
% 58.96/17.00  																																										| From (117) and (509) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																										| (510)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																										|
% 58.96/17.00  																																										| Using (438) and (510) yields:
% 58.96/17.00  																																										| (151) $false
% 58.96/17.00  																																										|
% 58.96/17.00  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.96/17.00  																																									|-Branch two:
% 58.96/17.00  																																									| (512) element(all_148_3_78, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.96/17.00  																																									| (513)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_148_3_78, all_194_0_79) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_148_3_78) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.96/17.00  																																									|
% 58.96/17.00  																																										| From (117) and (512) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																										| (438) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.96/17.00  																																										|
% 58.96/17.00  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (482), into two cases.
% 58.96/17.00  																																										|-Branch one:
% 58.96/17.00  																																										| (509)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_30_0_27) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																										|
% 58.96/17.00  																																											| From (117) and (509) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																											| (510)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																											|
% 58.96/17.00  																																											| Using (438) and (510) yields:
% 58.96/17.00  																																											| (151) $false
% 58.96/17.00  																																											|
% 58.96/17.00  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.96/17.00  																																										|-Branch two:
% 58.96/17.00  																																										| (512) element(all_148_3_78, all_30_0_27) = 0
% 58.96/17.00  																																										| (519)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (related(all_0_13_13, all_148_3_78, all_127_0_70) = v1 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, all_0_10_10, all_148_3_78) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 58.96/17.00  																																										|
% 58.96/17.00  																																											| From (117) and (512) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																											| (438) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.96/17.00  																																											|
% 58.96/17.00  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (484), into two cases.
% 58.96/17.00  																																											|-Branch one:
% 58.96/17.00  																																											| (521)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																											|
% 58.96/17.00  																																												| From (113) and (521) follows:
% 58.96/17.00  																																												| (510)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.96/17.00  																																												|
% 58.96/17.01  																																												| Using (438) and (510) yields:
% 58.96/17.01  																																												| (151) $false
% 58.96/17.01  																																												|
% 58.96/17.01  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.96/17.01  																																											|-Branch two:
% 58.96/17.01  																																											| (524) element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.96/17.01  																																											| (525)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_148_3_78) = v1 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.96/17.01  																																											|
% 58.96/17.01  																																												| Instantiating (525) with all_872_0_178, all_872_1_179 yields:
% 58.96/17.01  																																												| (526) ( ~ (all_872_1_179 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = all_872_1_179) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_148_3_78) = all_872_0_178 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_872_1_179 & ( ~ (all_872_1_179 = 0) | all_872_0_178 = 0))
% 58.96/17.01  																																												|
% 58.96/17.01  																																												| From (113) and (524) follows:
% 58.96/17.01  																																												| (438) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.96/17.01  																																												|
% 58.96/17.01  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (485), into two cases.
% 58.96/17.01  																																												|-Branch one:
% 58.96/17.01  																																												| (521)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.96/17.01  																																												|
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| From (113) and (521) follows:
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| (510)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.96/17.01  																																													|
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| Using (438) and (510) yields:
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| (151) $false
% 58.96/17.01  																																													|
% 58.96/17.01  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.96/17.01  																																												|-Branch two:
% 58.96/17.01  																																												| (524) element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.96/17.01  																																												| (532)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_148_3_78) = v1 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.96/17.01  																																												|
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| Instantiating (532) with all_876_0_180, all_876_1_181 yields:
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| (533) ( ~ (all_876_1_181 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = all_876_1_181) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_148_3_78) = all_876_0_180 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_876_1_181 & ( ~ (all_876_1_181 = 0) | all_876_0_180 = 0))
% 58.96/17.01  																																													|
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| From (113) and (524) follows:
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| (438) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.96/17.01  																																													|
% 58.96/17.01  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (486), into two cases.
% 58.96/17.01  																																													|-Branch one:
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| (521)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 58.96/17.01  																																													|
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| From (113) and (521) follows:
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| (510)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.96/17.01  																																														|
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| Using (438) and (510) yields:
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| (151) $false
% 58.96/17.01  																																														|
% 58.96/17.01  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.96/17.01  																																													|-Branch two:
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| (524) element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 58.96/17.01  																																													| (539)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = v1 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 58.96/17.01  																																													|
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| Instantiating (539) with all_880_0_182, all_880_1_183 yields:
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| (540) ( ~ (all_880_1_183 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = all_880_1_183) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = all_880_0_182 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_880_1_183 & ( ~ (all_880_1_183 = 0) | all_880_0_182 = 0))
% 58.96/17.01  																																														|
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| From (113) and (524) follows:
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| (438) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.96/17.01  																																														|
% 58.96/17.01  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (483), into two cases.
% 58.96/17.01  																																														|-Branch one:
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| (542)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_28_0_25) = 0)
% 58.96/17.01  																																														|
% 58.96/17.01  																																															| From (93) and (542) follows:
% 58.96/17.01  																																															| (510)  ~ (element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 58.96/17.01  																																															|
% 58.96/17.01  																																															| Using (438) and (510) yields:
% 58.96/17.01  																																															| (151) $false
% 58.96/17.01  																																															|
% 58.96/17.01  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 58.96/17.01  																																														|-Branch two:
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| (435) element(all_148_3_78, all_28_0_25) = 0
% 58.96/17.01  																																														| (546) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_148_3_78, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = v0))
% 58.96/17.01  																																														|
% 58.96/17.01  																																															| From (93) and (435) follows:
% 58.96/17.01  																																															| (438) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 58.96/17.01  																																															|
% 58.96/17.01  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (540), into two cases.
% 58.96/17.01  																																															|-Branch one:
% 58.96/17.01  																																															| (548)  ~ (all_880_1_183 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = all_880_1_183
% 58.96/17.01  																																															|
% 58.96/17.01  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (548) yields:
% 58.96/17.01  																																																| (549)  ~ (all_880_1_183 = 0)
% 58.96/17.01  																																																| (550) element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = all_880_1_183
% 58.96/17.01  																																																|
% 58.96/17.01  																																																| From (113) and (550) follows:
% 58.96/17.01  																																																| (551) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_880_1_183
% 58.96/17.01  																																																|
% 58.96/17.01  																																																| Instantiating formula (11) with all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10, all_880_1_183, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_880_1_183, element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.01  																																																| (552) all_880_1_183 = 0
% 59.03/17.01  																																																|
% 59.03/17.01  																																																| Equations (552) can reduce 549 to:
% 59.03/17.01  																																																| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.01  																																																|
% 59.03/17.01  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.01  																																															|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.01  																																															| (554) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = all_880_0_182 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_880_1_183 & ( ~ (all_880_1_183 = 0) | all_880_0_182 = 0)
% 59.03/17.01  																																															|
% 59.03/17.01  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (554) yields:
% 59.03/17.01  																																																| (555) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = all_880_0_182
% 59.03/17.01  																																																| (556) in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_880_1_183
% 59.03/17.01  																																																| (557)  ~ (all_880_1_183 = 0) | all_880_0_182 = 0
% 59.03/17.01  																																																|
% 59.03/17.01  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (526), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.01  																																																|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.01  																																																| (558)  ~ (all_872_1_179 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = all_872_1_179
% 59.03/17.01  																																																|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (558) yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (559)  ~ (all_872_1_179 = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (560) element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = all_872_1_179
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| From (113) and (560) follows:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (561) element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = all_872_1_179
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| Instantiating formula (11) with all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10, all_872_1_179, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = all_872_1_179, element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (562) all_872_1_179 = 0
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| Equations (562) can reduce 559 to:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.02  																																																|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																| (564) related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_148_3_78) = all_872_0_178 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_872_1_179 & ( ~ (all_872_1_179 = 0) | all_872_0_178 = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (564) yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (565) related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_148_3_78) = all_872_0_178
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (566) in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_872_1_179
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (567)  ~ (all_872_1_179 = 0) | all_872_0_178 = 0
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (568)  ~ (all_876_1_181 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = all_876_1_181
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (568) yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (569)  ~ (all_876_1_181 = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (570) element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = all_876_1_181
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| From (113) and (570) follows:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (571) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = all_876_1_181
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| Instantiating formula (11) with all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10, all_876_1_181, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = all_876_1_181, element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (572) all_876_1_181 = 0
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| Equations (572) can reduce 569 to:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	| (574) related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_148_3_78) = all_876_0_180 & in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_876_1_181 & ( ~ (all_876_1_181 = 0) | all_876_0_180 = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																	|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (574) yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (575) related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_148_3_78) = all_876_0_180
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (576) in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_876_1_181
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (577)  ~ (all_876_1_181 = 0) | all_876_0_180 = 0
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (479), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (578)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| From (113) and (578) follows:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| (498)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| Using (446) and (498) yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| (151) $false
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (581) element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		| (582)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 59.03/17.02  																																																		|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| Instantiating (582) with all_899_0_269, all_899_1_270 yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| (583) ( ~ (all_899_1_270 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = all_899_1_270) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = all_899_0_269 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_899_1_270 & ( ~ (all_899_1_270 = 0) | all_899_0_269 = 0))
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| From (113) and (581) follows:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (478), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| (578)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| From (113) and (578) follows:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| (498)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| Using (446) and (498) yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| (151) $false
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| (581) element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			| (589)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 59.03/17.02  																																																			|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| Instantiating (589) with all_903_0_271, all_903_1_272 yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| (590) ( ~ (all_903_1_272 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = all_903_1_272) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_220_3_105) = all_903_0_271 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_903_1_272 & ( ~ (all_903_1_272 = 0) | all_903_0_271 = 0))
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| From (113) and (581) follows:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| (578)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																					| From (113) and (578) follows:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																					| (498)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 59.03/17.02  																																																					|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																					| Using (446) and (498) yields:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																					| (151) $false
% 59.03/17.02  																																																					|
% 59.03/17.02  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| (581) element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				| (596)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 59.03/17.02  																																																				|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					| Instantiating (596) with all_907_0_273, all_907_1_274 yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					| (597) ( ~ (all_907_1_274 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = all_907_1_274) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_220_3_105) = all_907_0_273 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_907_1_274 & ( ~ (all_907_1_274 = 0) | all_907_0_273 = 0))
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					| From (113) and (581) follows:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (477), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					| (599)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_28_0_25) = 0)
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						| From (93) and (599) follows:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						| (498)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						| Using (446) and (498) yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						| (151) $false
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					| (445) element(all_220_3_105, all_28_0_25) = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					| (603) all_0_11_11 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : ((v2 = 0 & v1 = 0 &  ~ (v3 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, v0) = 0 & related(all_0_13_13, all_220_3_105, v0) = v3 & element(v0, all_28_0_25) = 0) | ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = v0))
% 59.03/17.03  																																																					|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						| From (93) and (445) follows:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (597), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						| (605)  ~ (all_907_1_274 = 0) & element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = all_907_1_274
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (605) yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (606)  ~ (all_907_1_274 = 0)
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (607) element(all_26_2_22, all_17_0_17) = all_907_1_274
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| From (113) and (607) follows:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (608) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_907_1_274
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| Instantiating formula (11) with all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10, all_907_1_274, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_907_1_274, element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (609) all_907_1_274 = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| Equations (609) can reduce 606 to:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						| (611) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_220_3_105) = all_907_0_273 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_907_1_274 & ( ~ (all_907_1_274 = 0) | all_907_0_273 = 0)
% 59.03/17.03  																																																						|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (611) yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (612) related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_220_3_105) = all_907_0_273
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (613) in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_907_1_274
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (614)  ~ (all_907_1_274 = 0) | all_907_0_273 = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (615)  ~ (all_899_1_270 = 0) & element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = all_899_1_270
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (615) yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (616)  ~ (all_899_1_270 = 0)
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (617) element(all_127_0_70, all_17_0_17) = all_899_1_270
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| From (113) and (617) follows:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (618) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = all_899_1_270
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| Instantiating formula (11) with all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10, all_899_1_270, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = all_899_1_270, element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (619) all_899_1_270 = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| Equations (619) can reduce 616 to:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							| (621) related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = all_899_0_269 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_899_1_270 & ( ~ (all_899_1_270 = 0) | all_899_0_269 = 0)
% 59.03/17.03  																																																							|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (621) yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (622) related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = all_899_0_269
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (623) in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_899_1_270
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (624)  ~ (all_899_1_270 = 0) | all_899_0_269 = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (590), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (625)  ~ (all_903_1_272 = 0) & element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = all_903_1_272
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (625) yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (626)  ~ (all_903_1_272 = 0)
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (627) element(all_194_0_79, all_17_0_17) = all_903_1_272
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| From (113) and (627) follows:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (628) element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = all_903_1_272
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| Instantiating formula (11) with all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10, all_903_1_272, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = all_903_1_272, element(all_194_0_79, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (629) all_903_1_272 = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| Equations (629) can reduce 626 to:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								| (631) related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_220_3_105) = all_903_0_271 & in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_903_1_272 & ( ~ (all_903_1_272 = 0) | all_903_0_271 = 0)
% 59.03/17.03  																																																								|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (631) yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (632) related(all_0_13_13, all_194_0_79, all_220_3_105) = all_903_0_271
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (633) in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_903_1_272
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (634)  ~ (all_903_1_272 = 0) | all_903_0_271 = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| Instantiating formula (21) with all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105, all_899_0_269, all_220_0_102 and discharging atoms related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = all_899_0_269, related(all_0_13_13, all_127_0_70, all_220_3_105) = all_220_0_102, yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (635) all_899_0_269 = all_220_0_102
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| Instantiating formula (21) with all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78, all_880_0_182, all_148_0_75 and discharging atoms related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = all_880_0_182, related(all_0_13_13, all_26_2_22, all_148_3_78) = all_148_0_75, yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (636) all_880_0_182 = all_148_0_75
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| Instantiating formula (11) with all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10, all_843_1_169, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_843_1_169, element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| (637) all_843_1_169 = 0
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.03  																																																									| Instantiating formula (11) with all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10, all_841_1_167, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_841_1_167, element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (638) all_841_1_167 = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| Instantiating formula (27) with all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10, all_903_1_272, all_907_1_274 and discharging atoms in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_907_1_274, in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_903_1_272, yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (639) all_907_1_274 = all_903_1_272
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| Instantiating formula (27) with all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10, all_899_1_270, all_907_1_274 and discharging atoms in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_907_1_274, in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_899_1_270, yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (640) all_907_1_274 = all_899_1_270
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| Instantiating formula (27) with all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10, all_876_1_181, all_880_1_183 and discharging atoms in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_880_1_183, in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_876_1_181, yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (641) all_880_1_183 = all_876_1_181
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| Instantiating formula (27) with all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10, all_872_1_179, all_880_1_183 and discharging atoms in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_880_1_183, in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_872_1_179, yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (642) all_880_1_183 = all_872_1_179
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| Combining equations (640,639) yields a new equation:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (643) all_903_1_272 = all_899_1_270
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| Combining equations (642,641) yields a new equation:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (644) all_876_1_181 = all_872_1_179
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| Combining equations (644,641) yields a new equation:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (642) all_880_1_183 = all_872_1_179
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| From (637) and (495) follows:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| From (643) and (633) follows:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (623) in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_899_1_270
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| From (644) and (576) follows:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (566) in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_872_1_179
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (649)  ~ (all_841_1_167 = 0)
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										| Equations (638) can reduce 649 to:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (638) all_841_1_167 = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									| (652) all_841_0_166 = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																									|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										| From (652) and (489) follows:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										| (653) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (624), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										| (616)  ~ (all_899_1_270 = 0)
% 59.03/17.04  																																																										|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (557), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.04  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																											| (549)  ~ (all_880_1_183 = 0)
% 59.03/17.04  																																																											|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												| Equations (642) can reduce 549 to:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												| (559)  ~ (all_872_1_179 = 0)
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (494), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												| (657)  ~ (all_843_1_169 = 0)
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| Equations (637) can reduce 657 to:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												| (637) all_843_1_169 = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												| (660) all_843_0_168 = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																												|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| From (660) and (493) follows:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| (661) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| Instantiating formula (67) with all_220_3_105, all_220_3_105, empty_set and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_220_3_105) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| (662)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_220_3_105, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, empty_set) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| Instantiating formula (67) with all_220_3_105, all_148_3_78, empty_set and discharging atoms relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_148_3_78) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| (663)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0) |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_148_3_78, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, empty_set) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| Instantiating formula (33) with all_899_1_270, all_0_10_10, all_220_3_105 and discharging atoms in(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_899_1_270, yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| (664) all_899_1_270 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = v0 & empty(all_0_10_10) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| Instantiating formula (33) with all_872_1_179, all_0_10_10, all_148_3_78 and discharging atoms in(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_872_1_179, yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| (665) all_872_1_179 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = v0 & empty(all_0_10_10) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (664), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| (619) all_899_1_270 = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														| Equations (619) can reduce 616 to:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| (616)  ~ (all_899_1_270 = 0)
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													| (669)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = v0 & empty(all_0_10_10) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 59.03/17.04  																																																													|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														| Instantiating (669) with all_1210_0_304, all_1210_1_305 yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														| (670) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_1210_1_305 & empty(all_0_10_10) = all_1210_0_304 & ( ~ (all_1210_1_305 = 0) | all_1210_0_304 = 0)
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (670) yields:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														| (671) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_1210_1_305
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														| (672) empty(all_0_10_10) = all_1210_0_304
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														| (673)  ~ (all_1210_1_305 = 0) | all_1210_0_304 = 0
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (662), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														| (578)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 59.03/17.04  																																																														|
% 59.03/17.04  																																																															| From (113) and (578) follows:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															| (498)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															| Using (446) and (498) yields:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															| (151) $false
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.05  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																														| (581) element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																														| (678)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_220_3_105, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, empty_set) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 59.03/17.05  																																																														|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															| From (113) and (581) follows:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (663), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															| (578)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0)
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																| From (113) and (578) follows:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																| (498)  ~ (element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0)
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																| Using (446) and (498) yields:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																| (151) $false
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															| (581) element(all_220_3_105, all_17_0_17) = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															| (684)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (( ~ (v0 = 0) & element(all_148_3_78, all_17_0_17) = v0) | (related(all_0_13_13, all_148_3_78, all_220_3_105) = v1 & in(all_220_3_105, empty_set) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0)))
% 59.03/17.05  																																																															|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																| From (113) and (581) follows:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																| (446) element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (665), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																| (562) all_872_1_179 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| Equations (562) can reduce 559 to:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																| (559)  ~ (all_872_1_179 = 0)
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																| (689)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = v0 & empty(all_0_10_10) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| Instantiating (689) with all_1387_0_446, all_1387_1_447 yields:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (690) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_1387_1_447 & empty(all_0_10_10) = all_1387_0_446 & ( ~ (all_1387_1_447 = 0) | all_1387_0_446 = 0)
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (690) yields:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (691) element(all_148_3_78, all_0_10_10) = all_1387_1_447
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (692) empty(all_0_10_10) = all_1387_0_446
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (693)  ~ (all_1387_1_447 = 0) | all_1387_0_446 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (11) with all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10, all_1210_1_305, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = all_1210_1_305, element(all_220_3_105, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (694) all_1210_1_305 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (40) with all_0_10_10, all_1387_0_446, all_41_0_32 and discharging atoms empty(all_0_10_10) = all_1387_0_446, empty(all_0_10_10) = all_41_0_32, yields:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (695) all_1387_0_446 = all_41_0_32
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| Instantiating formula (40) with all_0_10_10, all_1210_0_304, all_1387_0_446 and discharging atoms empty(all_0_10_10) = all_1387_0_446, empty(all_0_10_10) = all_1210_0_304, yields:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (696) all_1387_0_446 = all_1210_0_304
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| Using (672) and (376) yields:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (697)  ~ (all_1210_0_304 = 0)
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| Combining equations (695,696) yields a new equation:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (698) all_1210_0_304 = all_41_0_32
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| Equations (698) can reduce 697 to:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (156)  ~ (all_41_0_32 = 0)
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (673), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (700)  ~ (all_1210_1_305 = 0)
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		| Equations (694) can reduce 700 to:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (694) all_1210_1_305 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	| (703) all_1210_0_304 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																	|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		| Combining equations (703,698) yields a new equation:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		| (704) all_41_0_32 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		| Equations (704) can reduce 156 to:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.05  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																											| (552) all_880_1_183 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																											| (707) all_880_0_182 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																											|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																												| Combining equations (707,636) yields a new equation:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																												| (708) all_148_0_75 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																												|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																												| Equations (708) can reduce 433 to:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																												| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.05  																																																												|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.05  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																										| (619) all_899_1_270 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																										| (711) all_899_0_269 = 0
% 59.03/17.05  																																																										|
% 59.03/17.05  																																																											| Combining equations (635,711) yields a new equation:
% 59.03/17.05  																																																											| (712) all_220_0_102 = 0
% 59.03/17.06  																																																											|
% 59.03/17.06  																																																											| Simplifying 712 yields:
% 59.03/17.06  																																																											| (713) all_220_0_102 = 0
% 59.03/17.06  																																																											|
% 59.03/17.06  																																																											| Equations (713) can reduce 444 to:
% 59.03/17.06  																																																											| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.06  																																																											|
% 59.03/17.06  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.06  																																		|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.06  																																		| (715)  ~ (all_220_3_105 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = all_220_3_105
% 59.03/17.06  																																		|
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (715) yields:
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (716)  ~ (all_220_3_105 = 0)
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (717) relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = all_220_3_105
% 59.03/17.06  																																			|
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| Instantiating formula (63) with all_220_3_105, all_127_0_70 and discharging atoms relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = all_220_3_105, yields:
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (718)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_127_0_70, all_14_0_16) = v0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 & all_220_3_105 = 0)))
% 59.03/17.06  																																			|
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| Instantiating (718) with all_837_0_454, all_837_1_455 yields:
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (719) element(all_127_0_70, all_14_0_16) = all_837_1_455 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = all_837_0_454 & ( ~ (all_837_1_455 = 0) | (all_837_0_454 = 0 & all_220_3_105 = 0))
% 59.03/17.06  																																			|
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (719) yields:
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (720) element(all_127_0_70, all_14_0_16) = all_837_1_455
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (721) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_127_0_70) = all_837_0_454
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (722)  ~ (all_837_1_455 = 0) | (all_837_0_454 = 0 & all_220_3_105 = 0)
% 59.03/17.06  																																			|
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| From (114) and (720) follows:
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (723) element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = all_837_1_455
% 59.03/17.06  																																			|
% 59.03/17.06  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (722), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.06  																																			|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (724)  ~ (all_837_1_455 = 0)
% 59.03/17.06  																																			|
% 59.03/17.06  																																				| Instantiating formula (11) with all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10, all_837_1_455, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = all_837_1_455, element(all_127_0_70, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.06  																																				| (725) all_837_1_455 = 0
% 59.03/17.06  																																				|
% 59.03/17.06  																																				| Equations (725) can reduce 724 to:
% 59.03/17.06  																																				| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.06  																																				|
% 59.03/17.06  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.06  																																			|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (725) all_837_1_455 = 0
% 59.03/17.06  																																			| (728) all_837_0_454 = 0 & all_220_3_105 = 0
% 59.03/17.06  																																			|
% 59.03/17.06  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (728) yields:
% 59.03/17.06  																																				| (729) all_837_0_454 = 0
% 59.03/17.06  																																				| (730) all_220_3_105 = 0
% 59.03/17.06  																																				|
% 59.03/17.06  																																				| Equations (730) can reduce 716 to:
% 59.03/17.06  																																				| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.06  																																				|
% 59.03/17.06  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.06  																																	|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.06  																																	| (732)  ~ (all_148_3_78 = 0) & relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = all_148_3_78
% 59.03/17.06  																																	|
% 59.03/17.06  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (732) yields:
% 59.03/17.06  																																		| (733)  ~ (all_148_3_78 = 0)
% 59.03/17.06  																																		| (734) relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = all_148_3_78
% 59.03/17.06  																																		|
% 59.03/17.06  																																		| Instantiating formula (63) with all_148_3_78, all_26_2_22 and discharging atoms relstr_set_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = all_148_3_78, yields:
% 59.03/17.06  																																		| (735)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_26_2_22, all_14_0_16) = v0 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v1 = 0 & all_148_3_78 = 0)))
% 59.03/17.06  																																		|
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| Instantiating (735) with all_837_0_475, all_837_1_476 yields:
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| (736) element(all_26_2_22, all_14_0_16) = all_837_1_476 & relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = all_837_0_475 & ( ~ (all_837_1_476 = 0) | (all_837_0_475 = 0 & all_148_3_78 = 0))
% 59.03/17.07  																																		|
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (736) yields:
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| (737) element(all_26_2_22, all_14_0_16) = all_837_1_476
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| (738) relstr_element_smaller(all_0_13_13, empty_set, all_26_2_22) = all_837_0_475
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| (739)  ~ (all_837_1_476 = 0) | (all_837_0_475 = 0 & all_148_3_78 = 0)
% 59.03/17.07  																																		|
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| From (114) and (737) follows:
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| (740) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_837_1_476
% 59.03/17.07  																																		|
% 59.03/17.07  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (739), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.07  																																		|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| (741)  ~ (all_837_1_476 = 0)
% 59.03/17.07  																																		|
% 59.03/17.07  																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10, all_837_1_476, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_837_1_476, element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.07  																																			| (742) all_837_1_476 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  																																			|
% 59.03/17.07  																																			| Equations (742) can reduce 741 to:
% 59.03/17.07  																																			| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.07  																																			|
% 59.03/17.07  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.07  																																		|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| (742) all_837_1_476 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  																																		| (745) all_837_0_475 = 0 & all_148_3_78 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  																																		|
% 59.03/17.07  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (745) yields:
% 59.03/17.07  																																			| (746) all_837_0_475 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  																																			| (747) all_148_3_78 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  																																			|
% 59.03/17.07  																																			| Equations (747) can reduce 733 to:
% 59.03/17.07  																																			| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.07  																																			|
% 59.03/17.07  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.07  																										|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.07  																										| (749) empty(all_41_1_33) = 0
% 59.03/17.07  																										| (750) all_41_1_33 = empty_set
% 59.03/17.07  																										|
% 59.03/17.07  																											| Combining equations (118,750) yields a new equation:
% 59.03/17.07  																											| (751) all_0_10_10 = empty_set
% 59.03/17.07  																											|
% 59.03/17.07  																											| Simplifying 751 yields:
% 59.03/17.07  																											| (752) all_0_10_10 = empty_set
% 59.03/17.07  																											|
% 59.03/17.07  																											| Equations (752) can reduce 374 to:
% 59.03/17.07  																											| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.07  																											|
% 59.03/17.07  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.07  																									|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.07  																									| (754) empty(empty_set) = all_41_0_32
% 59.03/17.07  																									| (704) all_41_0_32 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  																									|
% 59.03/17.07  																										| Equations (704) can reduce 156 to:
% 59.03/17.07  																										| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.07  																										|
% 59.03/17.07  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.07  								|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.07  								| (158)  ~ (all_78_1_36 = 0)
% 59.03/17.07  								| (758)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : (element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = v0 & empty(all_0_10_10) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | v1 = 0))
% 59.03/17.07  								|
% 59.03/17.07  									| Instantiating (758) with all_102_0_496, all_102_1_497 yields:
% 59.03/17.07  									| (759) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_102_1_497 & empty(all_0_10_10) = all_102_0_496 & ( ~ (all_102_1_497 = 0) | all_102_0_496 = 0)
% 59.03/17.07  									|
% 59.03/17.07  									| Applying alpha-rule on (759) yields:
% 59.03/17.07  									| (760) element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_102_1_497
% 59.03/17.07  									| (761) empty(all_0_10_10) = all_102_0_496
% 59.03/17.07  									| (762)  ~ (all_102_1_497 = 0) | all_102_0_496 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  									|
% 59.03/17.07  									| Instantiating formula (11) with all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10, all_102_1_497, 0 and discharging atoms element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = all_102_1_497, element(all_26_2_22, all_0_10_10) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.07  									| (763) all_102_1_497 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  									|
% 59.03/17.07  									| Instantiating formula (40) with all_0_10_10, all_102_0_496, all_41_0_32 and discharging atoms empty(all_0_10_10) = all_102_0_496, empty(all_0_10_10) = all_41_0_32, yields:
% 59.03/17.07  									| (764) all_102_0_496 = all_41_0_32
% 59.03/17.07  									|
% 59.03/17.07  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (762), into two cases.
% 59.03/17.07  									|-Branch one:
% 59.03/17.07  									| (765)  ~ (all_102_1_497 = 0)
% 59.03/17.07  									|
% 59.03/17.07  										| Equations (763) can reduce 765 to:
% 59.03/17.07  										| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.07  										|
% 59.03/17.07  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.07  									|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.07  									| (763) all_102_1_497 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  									| (768) all_102_0_496 = 0
% 59.03/17.07  									|
% 59.03/17.08  										| Combining equations (768,764) yields a new equation:
% 59.03/17.08  										| (704) all_41_0_32 = 0
% 59.03/17.08  										|
% 59.03/17.08  										| Equations (704) can reduce 156 to:
% 59.03/17.08  										| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.08  										|
% 59.03/17.08  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.08  						|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.08  						| (704) all_41_0_32 = 0
% 59.03/17.08  						| (772)  ~ (all_41_2_34 = 0)
% 59.03/17.08  						|
% 59.03/17.08  							| Equations (148) can reduce 772 to:
% 59.03/17.08  							| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.08  							|
% 59.03/17.08  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.08  				|-Branch two:
% 59.03/17.08  				| (772)  ~ (all_41_2_34 = 0)
% 59.03/17.08  				| (775)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & rel_str(all_0_13_13) = v0)
% 59.03/17.08  				|
% 59.03/17.08  					| Instantiating (775) with all_75_0_498 yields:
% 59.03/17.08  					| (776)  ~ (all_75_0_498 = 0) & rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_75_0_498
% 59.03/17.08  					|
% 59.03/17.08  					| Applying alpha-rule on (776) yields:
% 59.03/17.08  					| (777)  ~ (all_75_0_498 = 0)
% 59.03/17.08  					| (778) rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_75_0_498
% 59.03/17.08  					|
% 59.03/17.08  					| Instantiating formula (44) with all_0_13_13, all_75_0_498, 0 and discharging atoms rel_str(all_0_13_13) = all_75_0_498, rel_str(all_0_13_13) = 0, yields:
% 59.03/17.08  					| (779) all_75_0_498 = 0
% 59.03/17.08  					|
% 59.03/17.08  					| Equations (779) can reduce 777 to:
% 59.03/17.08  					| (81) $false
% 59.03/17.08  					|
% 59.03/17.08  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 59.03/17.08  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 59.03/17.08  
% 59.03/17.08  16381ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------