↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU361+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:51 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  165 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   50 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  216 (  82   ~;  76   |;  38   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  20  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   1 sgn  29   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t44_yellow_0,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( rel_str(X1)
        & lower_bounded_relstr(X1)
        & antisymmetric_relstr(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => related(X1,bottom_of_relstr(X1),X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t44_yellow_0) ).

fof(t42_yellow_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( rel_str(X1)
        & lower_bounded_relstr(X1)
        & antisymmetric_relstr(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ( ex_inf_of_relstr_set(X1,the_carrier(X1))
        & ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,empty_set) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t42_yellow_0) ).

fof(d11_yellow_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( rel_str(X1)
     => bottom_of_relstr(X1) = join_on_relstr(X1,empty_set) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d11_yellow_0) ).

fof(t30_yellow_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( rel_str(X1)
        & antisymmetric_relstr(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( ( ( ! [X4] :
                      ( element(X4,the_carrier(X1))
                     => ( relstr_set_smaller(X1,X3,X4)
                       => related(X1,X2,X4) ) )
                  & relstr_set_smaller(X1,X3,X2) )
               => ( ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,X3)
                  & X2 = join_on_relstr(X1,X3) ) )
              & ( ( ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,X3)
                  & X2 = join_on_relstr(X1,X3) )
               => ( ! [X4] :
                      ( element(X4,the_carrier(X1))
                     => ( relstr_set_smaller(X1,X3,X4)
                       => related(X1,X2,X4) ) )
                  & relstr_set_smaller(X1,X3,X2) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t30_yellow_0) ).

fof(dt_k1_yellow_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( rel_str(X1)
     => element(join_on_relstr(X1,X2),the_carrier(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_yellow_0) ).

fof(t6_yellow_0,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( rel_str(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => ( relstr_element_smaller(X1,empty_set,X2)
            & relstr_set_smaller(X1,empty_set,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_yellow_0) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( rel_str(X1)
          & lower_bounded_relstr(X1)
          & antisymmetric_relstr(X1)
          & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
           => related(X1,bottom_of_relstr(X1),X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t44_yellow_0]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( rel_str(X1)
          & lower_bounded_relstr(X1)
          & antisymmetric_relstr(X1)
          & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
           => related(X1,bottom_of_relstr(X1),X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( rel_str(X1)
        & lower_bounded_relstr(X1)
        & antisymmetric_relstr(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ( ex_inf_of_relstr_set(X1,the_carrier(X1))
        & ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,empty_set) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t42_yellow_0]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ related(esk1_0,bottom_of_relstr(esk1_0),esk2_0)
    & element(esk2_0,the_carrier(esk1_0))
    & rel_str(esk1_0)
    & lower_bounded_relstr(esk1_0)
    & antisymmetric_relstr(esk1_0)
    & ~ empty_carrier(esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X13] :
      ( bottom_of_relstr(X13) = join_on_relstr(X13,empty_set)
      | ~ rel_str(X13) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d11_yellow_0])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11] :
      ( ( ~ rel_str(X7)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X7)
        | ~ element(X8,the_carrier(X7))
        | ~ relstr_set_smaller(X7,X11,X8)
        | ~ related(X7,X8,esk3_3(X7,X8,X11))
        | ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X7,X11) )
      & ( ~ rel_str(X7)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X7)
        | ~ element(X8,the_carrier(X7))
        | ~ relstr_set_smaller(X7,X11,X8)
        | ~ related(X7,X8,esk3_3(X7,X8,X11))
        | X8 = join_on_relstr(X7,X11) )
      & ( ~ rel_str(X7)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X7)
        | ~ element(X8,the_carrier(X7))
        | ~ relstr_set_smaller(X7,X11,X8)
        | relstr_set_smaller(X7,X11,esk3_3(X7,X8,X11))
        | ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X7,X11) )
      & ( ~ rel_str(X7)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X7)
        | ~ element(X8,the_carrier(X7))
        | ~ relstr_set_smaller(X7,X11,X8)
        | relstr_set_smaller(X7,X11,esk3_3(X7,X8,X11))
        | X8 = join_on_relstr(X7,X11) )
      & ( ~ rel_str(X7)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X7)
        | ~ element(X8,the_carrier(X7))
        | ~ relstr_set_smaller(X7,X11,X8)
        | element(esk3_3(X7,X8,X11),the_carrier(X7))
        | ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X7,X11) )
      & ( ~ rel_str(X7)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X7)
        | ~ element(X8,the_carrier(X7))
        | ~ relstr_set_smaller(X7,X11,X8)
        | element(esk3_3(X7,X8,X11),the_carrier(X7))
        | X8 = join_on_relstr(X7,X11) )
      & ( ~ rel_str(X7)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X7)
        | ~ element(X8,the_carrier(X7))
        | ~ ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X7,X9)
        | X8 != join_on_relstr(X7,X9)
        | related(X7,X8,X10)
        | ~ relstr_set_smaller(X7,X9,X10)
        | ~ element(X10,the_carrier(X7)) )
      & ( ~ rel_str(X7)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X7)
        | ~ element(X8,the_carrier(X7))
        | ~ ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X7,X9)
        | X8 != join_on_relstr(X7,X9)
        | relstr_set_smaller(X7,X9,X8) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t30_yellow_0])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( element(join_on_relstr(X15,X16),the_carrier(X15))
      | ~ rel_str(X15) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_yellow_0])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X26] :
      ( ( ~ rel_str(X26)
        | ~ lower_bounded_relstr(X26)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X26)
        | empty_carrier(X26)
        | ex_inf_of_relstr_set(X26,the_carrier(X26)) )
      & ( ~ rel_str(X26)
        | ~ lower_bounded_relstr(X26)
        | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X26)
        | empty_carrier(X26)
        | ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X26,empty_set) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ related(esk1_0,bottom_of_relstr(esk1_0),esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ rel_str(X1)
    | bottom_of_relstr(X1) = join_on_relstr(X1,empty_set) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    rel_str(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ rel_str(X2)
    | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X2)
    | ~ element(X4,the_carrier(X2))
    | ~ ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X2,X3)
    | X4 != join_on_relstr(X2,X3)
    | ~ relstr_set_smaller(X2,X3,X1)
    | ~ element(X1,the_carrier(X2))
    | related(X2,X4,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ rel_str(X1)
    | element(join_on_relstr(X1,X2),the_carrier(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ rel_str(X1)
    | ~ lower_bounded_relstr(X1)
    | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X1)
    | empty_carrier(X1)
    | ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,empty_set) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    lower_bounded_relstr(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    antisymmetric_relstr(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ empty_carrier(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ related(esk1_0,join_on_relstr(esk1_0,empty_set),esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ rel_str(X1)
    | ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ antisymmetric_relstr(X1)
    | ~ ex_sup_of_relstr_set(X1,X2)
    | ~ relstr_set_smaller(X1,X2,X3)
    | related(X1,join_on_relstr(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ex_sup_of_relstr_set(esk1_0,empty_set),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_16])]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk2_0,the_carrier(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X28,X29] :
      ( ( ~ rel_str(X28)
        | ~ element(X29,the_carrier(X28))
        | relstr_element_smaller(X28,empty_set,X29) )
      & ( ~ rel_str(X28)
        | ~ element(X29,the_carrier(X28))
        | relstr_set_smaller(X28,empty_set,X29) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t6_yellow_0])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ relstr_set_smaller(esk1_0,empty_set,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_21]),c_0_26]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ rel_str(X1)
    | ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | relstr_set_smaller(X1,empty_set,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_26]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU361+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:16:24 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.51  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % sh5l with pid 318576 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/0.51  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.51  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % SubtermCWHack with pid 318583 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/0.51  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.51  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.51  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.51  
% 0.15/0.51  % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.51  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 28
% 0.15/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4
% 0.15/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 40
% 0.15/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 40
% 0.15/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 60
% 0.15/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.15/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 0.15/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.15/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.15/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 27
% 0.15/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 24
% 0.15/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.15/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 25
% 0.15/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.15/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 12
% 0.15/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 6
% 0.15/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 53
% 0.15/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 12
% 0.15/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.15/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 32
% 0.15/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.15/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 32
% 0.15/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.15/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 219
% 0.15/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 60
% 0.15/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 5
% 0.15/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.15/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.15/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.15/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2948
% 0.15/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 496
% 0.15/0.51  
% 0.15/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.51  % User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.51  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.51  % Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.15/0.51  
% 0.15/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.51  % User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.51  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.51  % Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.15/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------