↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU368+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:12:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.31s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   84 (  42 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  29   ~;  24   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   8 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(free_g1_orders_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation_of2(X2,X1,X1)
     => ! [X3,X4] :
          ( rel_str_of(X1,X2) = rel_str_of(X3,X4)
         => ( X1 = X3
            & X2 = X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',free_g1_orders_2) ).

fof(redefinition_m2_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation_of2_as_subset(X3,X1,X2)
    <=> relation_of2(X3,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_m2_relset_1) ).

fof(dt_k1_yellow_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_order(X1))
      & antisymmetric(inclusion_order(X1))
      & transitive(inclusion_order(X1))
      & v1_partfun1(inclusion_order(X1),X1,X1)
      & relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X1),X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_yellow_1) ).

fof(redefinition_k1_yellow_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : inclusion_order(X1) = inclusion_relation(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k1_yellow_1) ).

fof(d1_yellow_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : incl_POSet(X1) = rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_order(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_yellow_1) ).

fof(t1_yellow_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( the_carrier(incl_POSet(X1)) = X1
      & the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(X1)) = inclusion_order(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_yellow_1) ).

fof(dt_k2_yellow_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X1))
      & rel_str(incl_POSet(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_yellow_1) ).

fof(abstractness_v1_orders_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( rel_str(X1)
     => ( strict_rel_str(X1)
       => X1 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X1),the_InternalRel(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abstractness_v1_orders_2) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X129,X130,X131,X132] :
      ( ( X129 = X131
        | rel_str_of(X129,X130) != rel_str_of(X131,X132)
        | ~ relation_of2(X130,X129,X129) )
      & ( X130 = X132
        | rel_str_of(X129,X130) != rel_str_of(X131,X132)
        | ~ relation_of2(X130,X129,X129) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[free_g1_orders_2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X139,X140,X141] :
      ( ( ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X141,X139,X140)
        | relation_of2(X141,X139,X140) )
      & ( ~ relation_of2(X141,X139,X140)
        | relation_of2_as_subset(X141,X139,X140) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_m2_relset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X152] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_order(X152))
      & antisymmetric(inclusion_order(X152))
      & transitive(inclusion_order(X152))
      & v1_partfun1(inclusion_order(X152),X152,X152)
      & relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X152),X152,X152) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_yellow_1]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X151] : inclusion_order(X151) = inclusion_relation(X151),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[redefinition_k1_yellow_1]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X156] : incl_POSet(X156) = rel_str_of(X156,inclusion_order(X156)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d1_yellow_1]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( the_carrier(incl_POSet(X1)) = X1
        & the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(X1)) = inclusion_order(X1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t1_yellow_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X3,X1) != rel_str_of(X4,X2)
    | ~ relation_of2(X1,X3,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( relation_of2(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X1),X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    inclusion_order(X1) = inclusion_relation(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X153] :
      ( strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X153))
      & rel_str(incl_POSet(X153)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_yellow_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    incl_POSet(X1) = rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_order(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( the_carrier(incl_POSet(esk14_0)) != esk14_0
    | the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(esk14_0)) != inclusion_order(esk14_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X3,X1) != rel_str_of(X4,X2)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X3,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_relation(X1),X1,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X133] :
      ( ~ rel_str(X133)
      | ~ strict_rel_str(X133)
      | X133 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X133),the_InternalRel(X133)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[abstractness_v1_orders_2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    incl_POSet(X1) = rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_relation(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    rel_str(incl_POSet(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X1,X3) != rel_str_of(X2,X4)
    | ~ relation_of2(X3,X1,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( the_carrier(incl_POSet(esk14_0)) != esk14_0
    | the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(esk14_0)) != inclusion_order(esk14_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( inclusion_relation(X1) = X2
    | rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_relation(X1)) != rel_str_of(X3,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( X1 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X1),the_InternalRel(X1))
    | ~ rel_str(X1)
    | ~ strict_rel_str(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    strict_rel_str(rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_relation(X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    rel_str(rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_relation(X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X1,X3) != rel_str_of(X2,X4)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X3,X1,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( the_carrier(rel_str_of(esk14_0,inclusion_relation(esk14_0))) != esk14_0
    | the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(esk14_0,inclusion_relation(esk14_0))) != inclusion_relation(esk14_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_17]),c_0_25]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_relation(X1))) = inclusion_relation(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]),c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_relation(X1)) != rel_str_of(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    the_carrier(rel_str_of(esk14_0,inclusion_relation(esk14_0))) != esk14_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    the_carrier(rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_relation(X1))) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_30])]),c_0_31]),c_0_32])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU368+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 03:00:47 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.31/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.31/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.31/1.73  % Total time : 1.373s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------