↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU368+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:53:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  17 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  100 (  43 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   88 (  38   ~;  33   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   0 sgn  53   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f33,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation_of2(X1,X0,X0)
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( rel_str_of(X0,X1) = rel_str_of(X2,X3)
         => ( X0 = X2
            & X1 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',free_g1_orders_2) ).

fof(f34,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( rel_str(X0)
     => ( strict_rel_str(X0)
       => X0 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X0),the_InternalRel(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abstractness_v1_orders_2) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_of2_as_subset(X2,X0,X1)
    <=> relation_of2(X2,X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_m2_relset_1) ).

fof(f47,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_order(X0))
      & antisymmetric(inclusion_order(X0))
      & transitive(inclusion_order(X0))
      & v1_partfun1(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0)
      & relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_yellow_1) ).

fof(f48,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X0))
      & rel_str(incl_POSet(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_yellow_1) ).

fof(f52,axiom,
    ! [X0] : incl_POSet(X0) = rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_yellow_1) ).

fof(f53,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( the_carrier(incl_POSet(X0)) = X0
      & the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(X0)) = inclusion_order(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_yellow_1) ).

fof(f54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( the_carrier(incl_POSet(X0)) = X0
        & the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(X0)) = inclusion_order(X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f53]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2,X3] :
          ( ( X0 = X2
            & X1 = X3 )
          | rel_str_of(X0,X1) != rel_str_of(X2,X3) )
      | ~ relation_of2(X1,X0,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X0),the_InternalRel(X0))
      | ~ strict_rel_str(X0)
      | ~ rel_str(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X0),the_InternalRel(X0))
      | ~ strict_rel_str(X0)
      | ~ rel_str(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( the_carrier(incl_POSet(X0)) != X0
      | inclusion_order(X0) != the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f105,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation_of2_as_subset(X2,X0,X1)
        | ~ relation_of2(X2,X0,X1) )
      & ( relation_of2(X2,X0,X1)
        | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X2,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ( sK13 != the_carrier(incl_POSet(sK13))
    | inclusion_order(sK13) != the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(sK13)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13]),skolemize(X0,sK13)],[f92]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( rel_str_of(X0,X1) != rel_str_of(X2,X3)
      | X1 = X3
      | ~ relation_of2(X1,X0,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f152,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( rel_str_of(X0,X1) != rel_str_of(X2,X3)
      | X0 = X2
      | ~ relation_of2(X1,X0,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ strict_rel_str(X0)
      | rel_str_of(the_carrier(X0),the_InternalRel(X0)) = X0
      | ~ rel_str(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X2,X0,X1)
      | relation_of2(X2,X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ! [X0] : rel_str(incl_POSet(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ! [X0] : strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ! [X0] : incl_POSet(X0) = rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ( sK13 != the_carrier(incl_POSet(sK13))
    | inclusion_order(sK13) != the_InternalRel(incl_POSet(sK13)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).

fof(f189,plain,
    ! [X0] : strict_rel_str(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f176,f182]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ! [X0] : rel_str(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f175,f182]) ).

fof(f195,plain,
    ( sK13 != the_carrier(rel_str_of(sK13,inclusion_order(sK13)))
    | inclusion_order(sK13) != the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(sK13,inclusion_order(sK13))) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f183,f182,f182]) ).

fof(f197,definition,
    ( spl14_1
  <=> inclusion_order(sK13) = the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(sK13,inclusion_order(sK13))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl14_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    ( inclusion_order(sK13) != the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(sK13,inclusion_order(sK13)))
    | spl14_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f197]) ).

fof(f201,definition,
    ( spl14_2
  <=> sK13 = the_carrier(rel_str_of(sK13,inclusion_order(sK13))) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl14_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

fof(f203,plain,
    ( sK13 != the_carrier(rel_str_of(sK13,inclusion_order(sK13)))
    | spl14_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f201]) ).

fof(f204,plain,
    ( ~ spl14_1
    | ~ spl14_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f195,f201,f197]) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation_of2(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f157,f170]) ).

fof(f290,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)) = rel_str_of(the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))),the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))))
      | ~ rel_str(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f153,f189]) ).

fof(f293,plain,
    ! [X0] : rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)) = rel_str_of(the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))),the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f290,f190]) ).

fof(f430,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)) != rel_str_of(X1,X2)
      | the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))) = X1
      | ~ relation_of2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f152,f293]) ).

fof(f432,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)) != rel_str_of(X1,X2)
      | the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))) = X2
      | ~ relation_of2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f151,f293]) ).

fof(f616,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))) = X0
      | ~ relation_of2(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f430]) ).

fof(f617,plain,
    ! [X0] : the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))) = X0,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f616,f230]) ).

fof(f671,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( inclusion_order(X0) = the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)))
      | ~ relation_of2(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f432]) ).

fof(f672,plain,
    ! [X0] : inclusion_order(X0) = the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f671,f230]) ).

fof(f679,plain,
    ( inclusion_order(sK13) != inclusion_order(sK13)
    | spl14_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f199,f672]) ).

fof(f694,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl14_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f679]) ).

fof(f695,plain,
    spl14_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f694]) ).

fof(f729,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl14_2 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f203,f617]) ).

fof(f730,plain,
    spl14_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f729]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl14_1
    | ~ spl14_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f204]) ).

cnf(s20,plain,
    spl14_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f695]) ).

cnf(s21,plain,
    spl14_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f730]) ).

cnf(s28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s21,s20]) ).

fof(f731,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s28]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU368+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 04:58:27 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026485)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026495)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=2944252571:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026491)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026490)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=2448213673_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026492)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=1875866429:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=2629998964:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026494)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=243898840:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026496)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=4143049491:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026491)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=3499396417:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.46  % TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.46  % TRYING [3]
% 0.19/0.46  % TRYING [4]
% 0.19/0.46  % TRYING [5]
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-3026485-3026493"...
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)...printing done.
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.46  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)Time elapsed: 0.016 s
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026493)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 0.19/0.46  % (3026485)Success in time 0.048 s
% 0.19/0.46  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------