↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU368+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:41:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.39s 3.12s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   43 (  17 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_931,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X1,X3) != rel_str_of(X2,X4)
    | ~ relation_of2(X3,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4j3jm_fg/lgb.p',i_0_931) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ( rel_str_of(the_carrier(X1),the_InternalRel(X1)) = X1
    | ~ rel_str(X1)
    | ~ strict_rel_str(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4j3jm_fg/lgb.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_603,plain,
    ( rel_str(rel_str_of(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation_of2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4j3jm_fg/lgb.p',i_0_603) ).

cnf(i_0_604,plain,
    ( strict_rel_str(rel_str_of(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation_of2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4j3jm_fg/lgb.p',i_0_604) ).

cnf(i_0_1141,plain,
    ( relation_of2(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4j3jm_fg/lgb.p',i_0_1141) ).

cnf(i_0_620,plain,
    relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_relation(X1),X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4j3jm_fg/lgb.p',i_0_620) ).

cnf(i_0_2676,negated_conjecture,
    ( the_carrier(rel_str_of(esk453_0,inclusion_relation(esk453_0))) != esk453_0
    | the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(esk453_0,inclusion_relation(esk453_0))) != inclusion_relation(esk453_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4j3jm_fg/lgb.p',i_0_2676) ).

cnf(i_0_930,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X3,X1) != rel_str_of(X4,X2)
    | ~ relation_of2(X1,X3,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4j3jm_fg/lgb.p',i_0_930) ).

cnf(c_0_2685,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X1,X3) != rel_str_of(X2,X4)
    | ~ relation_of2(X3,X1,X1) ),
    i_0_931 ).

cnf(c_0_2686,plain,
    ( rel_str_of(the_carrier(X1),the_InternalRel(X1)) = X1
    | ~ rel_str(X1)
    | ~ strict_rel_str(X1) ),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_2687,plain,
    ( rel_str(rel_str_of(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation_of2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    i_0_603 ).

cnf(c_0_2688,plain,
    ( strict_rel_str(rel_str_of(X1,X2))
    | ~ relation_of2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    i_0_604 ).

cnf(c_0_2689,plain,
    ( relation_of2(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_1141 ).

cnf(c_0_2690,plain,
    relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_relation(X1),X1,X1),
    i_0_620 ).

cnf(c_0_2691,negated_conjecture,
    ( the_carrier(rel_str_of(esk453_0,inclusion_relation(esk453_0))) != esk453_0
    | the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(esk453_0,inclusion_relation(esk453_0))) != inclusion_relation(esk453_0) ),
    i_0_2676 ).

cnf(c_0_2692,plain,
    ( the_carrier(rel_str_of(X1,X2)) = X1
    | ~ relation_of2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2685,c_0_2686])]),c_0_2687]),c_0_2688]) ).

cnf(c_0_2693,plain,
    relation_of2(inclusion_relation(X1),X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2689,c_0_2690]) ).

cnf(c_0_2694,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X3,X1) != rel_str_of(X4,X2)
    | ~ relation_of2(X1,X3,X3) ),
    i_0_930 ).

cnf(c_0_2695,negated_conjecture,
    the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(esk453_0,inclusion_relation(esk453_0))) != inclusion_relation(esk453_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2691,c_0_2692]),c_0_2693])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2696,plain,
    ( the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(X1,X2)) = X2
    | ~ relation_of2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2694,c_0_2686])]),c_0_2687]),c_0_2688]) ).

cnf(c_0_2697,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2695,c_0_2696]),c_0_2693])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU368+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 12:32:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.49  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.49  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.39/3.12  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.39/3.12  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.39/3.12  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.39/3.12  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_B01_00_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S04AN
% 8.39/3.12  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.39/3.12  #
% 8.39/3.12  # Preprocessing time       : 0.014 s
% 8.39/3.12  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.39/3.12  
% 8.39/3.12  # Proof found!
% 8.39/3.12  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.39/3.12  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.39/3.12  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.39/3.12  
% 8.39/3.12  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.39/3.12  # User time                : 0.065 s
% 8.39/3.12  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 8.39/3.12  # Total time               : 0.069 s
% 8.39/3.12  # Maximum resident set size: 7208 pages
% 8.39/3.12  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------