%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : SEU373+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:36:44 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 224.85s 225.07s % Output : Refutation 224.85s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SEU373+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 23:25:15 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : % 224.85/225.07 % 224.85/225.07 SPASS V 3.9 % 224.85/225.07 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 224.85/225.07 % SZS status Theorem % 224.85/225.07 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 224.85/225.07 SPASS derived 164 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 1968 clauses. % 224.85/225.07 SPASS allocated 195672 KBytes. % 224.85/225.07 SPASS spent 0:3:44.59 on the problem. % 224.85/225.07 0:00:00.05 for the input. % 224.85/225.07 0:3:42.81 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 224.85/225.07 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 224.85/225.07 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 224.85/225.07 0:00:01.08 for the reduction. % 224.85/225.07 % 224.85/225.07 % 224.85/225.07 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 17 : % 224.85/225.07 % SZS output start Refutation % 224.85/225.07 1[0:Inp] || -> one_sorted_str(skc47)*. % 224.85/225.07 194[0:Inp] || -> net_str(skc48,skc47)*. % 224.85/225.07 335[0:Inp] || -> subnetstr(skc49,skc47,skc48)*. % 224.85/225.07 463[0:Inp] || subset(the_carrier(skc49),the_carrier(skc48))*l -> . % 224.85/225.07 813[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u)* -> rel_str(v). % 224.85/225.07 814[0:Inp] rel_str(u) || subrelstr(v,u)* -> rel_str(v). % 224.85/225.07 1345[0:Inp] rel_str(u) rel_str(v) || subrelstr(v,u)* -> subset(the_carrier(v),the_carrier(u)). % 224.85/225.07 1354[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u) subnetstr(w,u,v)* -> net_str(w,u). % 224.85/225.07 1566[0:Inp] one_sorted_str(u) || subnetstr(v,u,w)* net_str(w,u) net_str(v,u) -> subrelstr(v,w). % 224.85/225.07 2366[0:MRR:1566.3,1354.3] one_sorted_str(u) || net_str(v,u) subnetstr(w,u,v)* -> subrelstr(w,v). % 224.85/225.07 2375[0:MRR:1345.1,814.2] rel_str(u) || subrelstr(v,u)* -> subset(the_carrier(v),the_carrier(u)). % 224.85/225.07 2787[0:Res:194.0,813.1] one_sorted_str(skc47) || -> rel_str(skc48)*. % 224.85/225.07 2798[0:Res:335.0,2366.1] one_sorted_str(skc47) || net_str(skc48,skc47) -> subrelstr(skc49,skc48)*. % 224.85/225.07 2818[0:Res:2375.2,463.0] rel_str(skc48) || subrelstr(skc49,skc48)* -> . % 224.85/225.07 2820[0:MRR:2787.0,1.0] || -> rel_str(skc48)*. % 224.85/225.07 2822[0:MRR:2818.0,2820.0] || subrelstr(skc49,skc48)* -> . % 224.85/225.07 2824[0:MRR:2798.0,2798.1,2798.2,1.0,194.0,2822.0] || -> . % 224.85/225.07 % SZS output end Refutation % 224.85/225.07 Formulae used in the proof : t19_yellow_6 dt_l1_waybel_0 dt_m1_yellow_0 d13_yellow_0 dt_m1_yellow_6 d8_yellow_6 % 224.85/225.07 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------