↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU382+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:12:07 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.29s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  18   ~;  14   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   46 (   4 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(redefinition_m2_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( relation_of2_as_subset(X3,X1,X2)
    <=> relation_of2(X3,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_m2_relset_1) ).

fof(dt_k1_yellow_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_order(X1))
      & antisymmetric(inclusion_order(X1))
      & transitive(inclusion_order(X1))
      & v1_partfun1(inclusion_order(X1),X1,X1)
      & relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X1),X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_yellow_1) ).

fof(t4_waybel_7,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(X1)) = powerset(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_waybel_7) ).

fof(free_g1_orders_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( relation_of2(X2,X1,X1)
     => ! [X3,X4] :
          ( rel_str_of(X1,X2) = rel_str_of(X3,X4)
         => ( X1 = X3
            & X2 = X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',free_g1_orders_2) ).

fof(dt_k2_yellow_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X1))
      & rel_str(incl_POSet(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_yellow_1) ).

fof(d1_yellow_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : incl_POSet(X1) = rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_order(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_yellow_1) ).

fof(t4_yellow_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : boole_POSet(X1) = incl_POSet(powerset(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_yellow_1) ).

fof(abstractness_v1_orders_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( rel_str(X1)
     => ( strict_rel_str(X1)
       => X1 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X1),the_InternalRel(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abstractness_v1_orders_2) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X207,X208,X209] :
      ( ( ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X209,X207,X208)
        | relation_of2(X209,X207,X208) )
      & ( ~ relation_of2(X209,X207,X208)
        | relation_of2_as_subset(X209,X207,X208) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_m2_relset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X150] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_order(X150))
      & antisymmetric(inclusion_order(X150))
      & transitive(inclusion_order(X150))
      & v1_partfun1(inclusion_order(X150),X150,X150)
      & relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X150),X150,X150) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_yellow_1]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(X1)) = powerset(X1),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t4_waybel_7]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X181,X182,X183,X184] :
      ( ( X181 = X183
        | rel_str_of(X181,X182) != rel_str_of(X183,X184)
        | ~ relation_of2(X182,X181,X181) )
      & ( X182 = X184
        | rel_str_of(X181,X182) != rel_str_of(X183,X184)
        | ~ relation_of2(X182,X181,X181) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[free_g1_orders_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( relation_of2(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X1),X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X151] :
      ( strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X151))
      & rel_str(incl_POSet(X151)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k2_yellow_1]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X146] : incl_POSet(X146) = rel_str_of(X146,inclusion_order(X146)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d1_yellow_1]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    the_carrier(boole_POSet(esk22_0)) != powerset(esk22_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X221] : boole_POSet(X221) = incl_POSet(powerset(X221)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t4_yellow_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X1,X3) != rel_str_of(X2,X4)
    | ~ relation_of2(X3,X1,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    relation_of2(inclusion_order(X1),X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X118] :
      ( ~ rel_str(X118)
      | ~ strict_rel_str(X118)
      | X118 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X118),the_InternalRel(X118)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[abstractness_v1_orders_2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    incl_POSet(X1) = rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_order(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    rel_str(incl_POSet(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    the_carrier(boole_POSet(esk22_0)) != powerset(esk22_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    boole_POSet(X1) = incl_POSet(powerset(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_order(X1)) != rel_str_of(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( X1 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X1),the_InternalRel(X1))
    | ~ rel_str(X1)
    | ~ strict_rel_str(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    strict_rel_str(rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_order(X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    rel_str(rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_order(X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    the_carrier(rel_str_of(powerset(esk22_0),inclusion_order(powerset(esk22_0)))) != powerset(esk22_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    the_carrier(rel_str_of(X1,inclusion_order(X1))) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27])]),c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU382+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 03:02:20 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.29/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.29/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.29/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.73  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------