↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : SEU382+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:53:05 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.46s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  26 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  23   ~;  17   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   56 (  55   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( rel_str(X0)
     => ( strict_rel_str(X0)
       => X0 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X0),the_InternalRel(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',abstractness_v1_orders_2) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ! [X0] : incl_POSet(X0) = rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_yellow_1) ).

fof(f31,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_order(X0))
      & antisymmetric(inclusion_order(X0))
      & transitive(inclusion_order(X0))
      & v1_partfun1(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0)
      & relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_yellow_1) ).

fof(f33,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X0))
      & rel_str(incl_POSet(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_yellow_1) ).

fof(f60,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation_of2(X1,X0,X0)
     => ! [X2,X3] :
          ( rel_str_of(X0,X1) = rel_str_of(X2,X3)
         => ( X0 = X2
            & X1 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',free_g1_orders_2) ).

fof(f77,axiom,
    ! [X0] : inclusion_order(X0) = inclusion_relation(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_k1_yellow_1) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( relation_of2_as_subset(X2,X0,X1)
    <=> relation_of2(X2,X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_m2_relset_1) ).

fof(f84,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(X0)) = powerset(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_waybel_7) ).

fof(f85,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : the_carrier(boole_POSet(X0)) = powerset(X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f84]) ).

fof(f86,axiom,
    ! [X0] : boole_POSet(X0) = incl_POSet(powerset(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_yellow_1) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_order(X0))
      & antisymmetric(inclusion_order(X0))
      & transitive(inclusion_order(X0))
      & relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0) ),
    inference(pure_predicate_removal,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_order(X0))
      & antisymmetric(inclusion_order(X0))
      & relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0) ),
    inference(pure_predicate_removal,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( reflexive(inclusion_order(X0))
      & relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0) ),
    inference(pure_predicate_removal,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0),
    inference(pure_predicate_removal,[],[f95]) ).

fof(f99,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X0),the_InternalRel(X0))
      | ~ strict_rel_str(X0)
      | ~ rel_str(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = rel_str_of(the_carrier(X0),the_InternalRel(X0))
      | ~ strict_rel_str(X0)
      | ~ rel_str(X0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f99]) ).

fof(f161,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2,X3] :
          ( ( X0 = X2
            & X1 = X3 )
          | rel_str_of(X0,X1) != rel_str_of(X2,X3) )
      | ~ relation_of2(X1,X0,X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f60]) ).

fof(f173,plain,
    ? [X0] : powerset(X0) != the_carrier(boole_POSet(X0)),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f214,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( relation_of2_as_subset(X2,X0,X1)
        | ~ relation_of2(X2,X0,X1) )
      & ( relation_of2(X2,X0,X1)
        | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X2,X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f215,plain,
    powerset(sK26) != the_carrier(boole_POSet(sK26)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK26]),skolemize(X0,sK26)],[f173]) ).

fof(f216,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ strict_rel_str(X0)
      | rel_str_of(the_carrier(X0),the_InternalRel(X0)) = X0
      | ~ rel_str(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

fof(f323,plain,
    ! [X0] : incl_POSet(X0) = rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_order(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f326,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_order(X0),X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f327,plain,
    ! [X0] : rel_str(incl_POSet(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f328,plain,
    ! [X0] : strict_rel_str(incl_POSet(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f400,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( rel_str_of(X0,X1) != rel_str_of(X2,X3)
      | X0 = X2
      | ~ relation_of2(X1,X0,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f161]) ).

fof(f493,plain,
    ! [X0] : inclusion_order(X0) = inclusion_relation(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f494,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X2,X0,X1)
      | relation_of2(X2,X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f214]) ).

fof(f501,plain,
    powerset(sK26) != the_carrier(boole_POSet(sK26)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f215]) ).

fof(f502,plain,
    ! [X0] : boole_POSet(X0) = incl_POSet(powerset(X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f507,plain,
    ! [X0] : incl_POSet(X0) = rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f323,f493]) ).

fof(f508,plain,
    ! [X0] : boole_POSet(X0) = rel_str_of(powerset(X0),inclusion_relation(powerset(X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f502,f507]) ).

fof(f509,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation_of2_as_subset(inclusion_relation(X0),X0,X0),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f326,f493]) ).

fof(f510,plain,
    ! [X0] : strict_rel_str(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f328,f507]) ).

fof(f511,plain,
    ! [X0] : rel_str(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f327,f507]) ).

fof(f568,plain,
    powerset(sK26) != the_carrier(rel_str_of(powerset(sK26),inclusion_relation(powerset(sK26)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f501,f508]) ).

fof(f704,plain,
    ! [X0] : relation_of2(inclusion_relation(X0),X0,X0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f494,f509]) ).

fof(f806,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0)) = rel_str_of(the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0))),the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0))))
      | ~ rel_str(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f216,f510]) ).

fof(f821,plain,
    ! [X0] : rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0)) = rel_str_of(the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0))),the_InternalRel(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0)))),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f806,f511]) ).

fof(f1318,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0)) != rel_str_of(X1,X2)
      | the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0))) = X1
      | ~ relation_of2(X2,X1,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f400,f821]) ).

fof(f1862,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0))) = X0
      | ~ relation_of2(inclusion_relation(X0),X0,X0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f1318]) ).

fof(f1863,plain,
    ! [X0] : the_carrier(rel_str_of(X0,inclusion_relation(X0))) = X0,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f1862,f704]) ).

fof(f1978,plain,
    powerset(sK26) != powerset(sK26),
    inference(superposition,[],[f568,f1863]) ).

fof(f1993,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1978]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SEU382+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 28 05:02:01 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order model finding
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029116)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)dis+10_1_sil=32000:sp=arity:random_seed=177145699:i=103:fgj=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/103Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029122)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029121)fmb+10_1_sas=cadical:bce=on:rp=on:random_seed=1030849139_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/0Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029125)ott+31_1_sil=16000:lcm=predicate:bce=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=3922849682:i=116_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/116Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029122)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=2100370151:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029123)dis+10_161_sil=256000:plsq=on:plsqr=61199697,1048576:gs=on:alpa=true:sac=on:slsq=on:cn=on:random_seed=4280541527:i=88024:add=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/88024Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029127)ott-3_16_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=arity:fd=off:rp=on:random_seed=3578096603:i=159:bs=unit_only:nicw=on:fsr=off:amm=off_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/159Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029126)ott+1_1_to=lpo:sil=16000:sp=reverse_arity:erd=off:random_seed=1032786188:i=131_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/131Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-3029116-3029124"...
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)...printing done.
% 0.15/0.46  % TRYING [1]
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.46  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)Time elapsed: 0.016 s
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029124)Instructions burned: 44 (million)
% 0.15/0.46  % (3029116)Success in time 0.045 s
% 0.15/0.46  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------