↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SEU388+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:24:56 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.16s 1.66s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  124 (  13 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   19 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  148 (  53   ~;  53   |;  25   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   0 sgn  25   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t3_yellow19,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( top_str(X1)
        & topological_space(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( in(X3,neighborhood_system(X1,X2))
            <=> point_neighbourhood(X3,X1,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_yellow19) ).

fof(d1_yellow19,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( top_str(X1)
        & topological_space(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => neighborhood_system(X1,X2) = a_2_0_yellow19(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_yellow19) ).

fof(fraenkel_a_2_0_yellow19,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X3,the_carrier(X2))
        & top_str(X2)
        & topological_space(X2)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X2) )
     => ( in(X1,a_2_0_yellow19(X2,X3))
      <=> ? [X4] :
            ( X1 = X4
            & point_neighbourhood(X4,X2,X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fraenkel_a_2_0_yellow19) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( top_str(X1)
          & topological_space(X1)
          & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
           => ! [X3] :
                ( in(X3,neighborhood_system(X1,X2))
              <=> point_neighbourhood(X3,X1,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t3_yellow19]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( top_str(X1)
        & topological_space(X1)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
         => neighborhood_system(X1,X2) = a_2_0_yellow19(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d1_yellow19]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( top_str(X1)
          & topological_space(X1)
          & ~ empty_carrier(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
           => ! [X3] :
                ( in(X3,neighborhood_system(X1,X2))
              <=> point_neighbourhood(X3,X1,X2) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( element(X3,the_carrier(X2))
        & top_str(X2)
        & topological_space(X2)
        & ~ empty_carrier(X2) )
     => ( in(X1,a_2_0_yellow19(X2,X3))
      <=> ? [X4] :
            ( X1 = X4
            & point_neighbourhood(X4,X2,X3) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fraenkel_a_2_0_yellow19]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X64,X65] :
      ( neighborhood_system(X64,X65) = a_2_0_yellow19(X64,X65)
      | ~ element(X65,the_carrier(X64))
      | ~ top_str(X64)
      | ~ topological_space(X64)
      | empty_carrier(X64) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( point_neighbourhood(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
      | in(esk3_0,neighborhood_system(esk1_0,esk2_0)) )
    & ( ~ point_neighbourhood(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
      | ~ in(esk3_0,neighborhood_system(esk1_0,esk2_0)) )
    & element(esk2_0,the_carrier(esk1_0))
    & top_str(esk1_0)
    & topological_space(esk1_0)
    & ~ empty_carrier(esk1_0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X165,X166,X167,X169] :
      ( ( ~ element(X167,the_carrier(X166))
        | ~ top_str(X166)
        | ~ topological_space(X166)
        | empty_carrier(X166)
        | in(X165,a_2_0_yellow19(X166,X167))
        | X165 != X169
        | ~ point_neighbourhood(X169,X166,X167) )
      & ( ~ element(X167,the_carrier(X166))
        | ~ top_str(X166)
        | ~ topological_space(X166)
        | empty_carrier(X166)
        | ~ in(X165,a_2_0_yellow19(X166,X167))
        | X165 = esk23_3(X165,X166,X167) )
      & ( ~ element(X167,the_carrier(X166))
        | ~ top_str(X166)
        | ~ topological_space(X166)
        | empty_carrier(X166)
        | ~ in(X165,a_2_0_yellow19(X166,X167))
        | point_neighbourhood(esk23_3(X165,X166,X167),X166,X167) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ element(X2,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ top_str(X1)
    | ~ topological_space(X1)
    | neighborhood_system(X1,X2) = a_2_0_yellow19(X1,X2)
    | empty_carrier(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    element(esk2_0,the_carrier(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    top_str(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    topological_space(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ empty_carrier(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X2))
    | ~ top_str(X2)
    | ~ topological_space(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,a_2_0_yellow19(X2,X3))
    | empty_carrier(X2)
    | point_neighbourhood(esk23_3(X1,X2,X3),X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    a_2_0_yellow19(esk1_0,esk2_0) = neighborhood_system(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X2))
    | ~ top_str(X2)
    | ~ topological_space(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,a_2_0_yellow19(X2,X3))
    | empty_carrier(X2)
    | X1 = esk23_3(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,neighborhood_system(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | point_neighbourhood(esk23_3(X1,esk1_0,esk2_0),esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_16])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( point_neighbourhood(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | in(esk3_0,neighborhood_system(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X1,neighborhood_system(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | esk23_3(X1,esk1_0,esk2_0) = X1 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_16])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X2))
    | ~ top_str(X2)
    | ~ topological_space(X2)
    | X4 != X1
    | ~ point_neighbourhood(X1,X2,X3)
    | empty_carrier(X2)
    | in(X4,a_2_0_yellow19(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( point_neighbourhood(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | point_neighbourhood(esk23_3(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( point_neighbourhood(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | esk23_3(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0) = esk3_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ element(X3,the_carrier(X1))
    | ~ topological_space(X1)
    | ~ top_str(X1)
    | ~ point_neighbourhood(X2,X1,X3)
    | in(X2,a_2_0_yellow19(X1,X3))
    | empty_carrier(X1) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    point_neighbourhood(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ point_neighbourhood(esk3_0,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    | ~ in(esk3_0,neighborhood_system(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk3_0,neighborhood_system(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_16]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_11])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25])]),c_0_27])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SEU388+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.54  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.54  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.54  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.54  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.16/0.54  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.16/0.54  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.54  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.54  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:24:14 UTC 2026
% 0.16/0.54  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.54  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.61  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.61  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.16/1.66  % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.16/1.66  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.16/1.66  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % new_bool_3 with pid 2379270 completed with status 0
% 5.16/1.66  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 5.16/1.66  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.16/1.66  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 5.16/1.66  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.16/1.66  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.16/1.66  % Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % new_bool_3 with pid 2379276 completed with status 0
% 5.16/1.66  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 5.16/1.66  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 5.16/1.66  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 900s (3) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 5.16/1.66  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.16/1.66  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.16/1.66  % Scheduled 12 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 5.16/1.66  % Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 5.16/1.66  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.16/1.66  
% 5.16/1.66  % Proof found!
% 5.16/1.66  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.16/1.66  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.16/1.66  % Parsed axioms                        : 885
% 5.16/1.66  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 690
% 5.16/1.66  % Initial clauses                      : 861
% 5.16/1.66  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 29
% 5.16/1.66  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 832
% 5.16/1.66  % Processed clauses                    : 4398
% 5.16/1.66  % ...of these trivial                  : 98
% 5.16/1.66  % ...subsumed                          : 2100
% 5.16/1.66  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2199
% 5.16/1.66  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 389
% 5.16/1.66  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 5.16/1.66  % Backward-subsumed                    : 10
% 5.16/1.66  % Backward-rewritten                   : 109
% 5.16/1.66  % Generated clauses                    : 13174
% 5.16/1.66  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12013
% 5.16/1.66  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 5.16/1.66  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 48
% 5.16/1.66  % Paramodulations                      : 12855
% 5.16/1.66  % Factorizations                       : 8
% 5.16/1.66  % NegExts                              : 0
% 5.16/1.66  % Equation resolutions                 : 389
% 5.16/1.66  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 5.16/1.66  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2569
% 5.16/1.66  % ...of those cached                   : 2082
% 5.16/1.66  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 5.16/1.66  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 5.16/1.66  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.16/1.66  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 5.16/1.66  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.16/1.66  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 5.16/1.66  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 5.16/1.66  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 5.16/1.66  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 5.16/1.66  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 5.16/1.66  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 5.16/1.66  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 5.16/1.66  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1135
% 5.16/1.66  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 302
% 5.16/1.66  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 5.16/1.66  %    Negative unit clauses             : 163
% 5.16/1.66  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 669
% 5.16/1.66  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9174
% 5.16/1.66  % ...number of literals in the above   : 30417
% 5.16/1.66  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 5.16/1.66  % Current number of archived clauses   : 869
% 5.16/1.66  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 400606
% 5.16/1.66  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 84721
% 5.16/1.66  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 892
% 5.16/1.66  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8304
% 5.16/1.66  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 5.16/1.66  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 68
% 5.16/1.66  % BW rewrite match successes           : 30
% 5.16/1.66  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 5.16/1.66  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 5.16/1.66  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 244073
% 5.16/1.66  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 15812
% 5.16/1.66  
% 5.16/1.66  % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.16/1.66  % User time                : 0.904 s
% 5.16/1.66  % System time              : 0.038 s
% 5.16/1.66  % Total time               : 0.943 s
% 5.16/1.66  % Maximum resident set size: 6672 pages
% 5.16/1.66  
% 5.16/1.66  % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.16/1.66  % User time                : 1.813 s
% 5.16/1.66  % System time              : 0.075 s
% 5.16/1.66  % Total time               : 1.887 s
% 5.16/1.66  % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 5.16/1.66  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------