↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU413+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:12:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.31s 1.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  101 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  117 (  41   ~;  37   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t23_latsum_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( l1_orders_2(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( l1_orders_2(X2)
         => ! [X3] :
              ( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
             => ! [X4] :
                  ( m1_subset_1(X4,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
                 => ( ( v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
                      & m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
                      & r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2),X3,X4)
                      & r2_hidden(X4,u1_struct_0(X1)) )
                   => r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X1)) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_latsum_1) ).

fof(t21_latsum_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( l1_orders_2(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( l1_orders_2(X2)
         => ! [X3,X4] :
              ( ( v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
                & m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
                & r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X3,X4),u1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
                & r2_hidden(X4,u1_struct_0(X1)) )
             => r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X1)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_latsum_1) ).

fof(d9_orders_2,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( l1_orders_2(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
             => ( r1_orders_2(X1,X2,X3)
              <=> r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X2,X3),u1_orders_2(X1)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d9_orders_2) ).

fof(dt_k1_latsum_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( l1_orders_2(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X2) )
     => ( v1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2))
        & l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k1_latsum_1) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( l1_orders_2(X1)
       => ! [X2] :
            ( l1_orders_2(X2)
           => ! [X3] :
                ( m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
               => ! [X4] :
                    ( m1_subset_1(X4,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
                   => ( ( v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
                        & m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
                        & r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2),X3,X4)
                        & r2_hidden(X4,u1_struct_0(X1)) )
                     => r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X1)) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t23_latsum_1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X121,X122,X123,X124] :
      ( ~ l1_orders_2(X121)
      | ~ l1_orders_2(X122)
      | ~ v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X121),u1_struct_0(X122)),X122)
      | ~ m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X121),u1_struct_0(X122)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X122)))
      | ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X123,X124),u1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X121,X122)))
      | ~ r2_hidden(X124,u1_struct_0(X121))
      | r2_hidden(X123,u1_struct_0(X121)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t21_latsum_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( l1_orders_2(esk1_0)
    & l1_orders_2(esk2_0)
    & m1_subset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    & m1_subset_1(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    & v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),esk2_0)
    & m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk2_0)))
    & r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & r2_hidden(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
    & ~ r2_hidden(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X2)
    | ~ v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(X1),u1_struct_0(X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X2)))
    | ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X3,X4),u1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2)))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X4,u1_struct_0(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    v12_waybel_0(k3_xboole_0(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    l1_orders_2(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    l1_orders_2(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X86,X87,X88] :
      ( ( ~ r1_orders_2(X86,X87,X88)
        | r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X87,X88),u1_orders_2(X86))
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X88,u1_struct_0(X86))
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X87,u1_struct_0(X86))
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X86) )
      & ( ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X87,X88),u1_orders_2(X86))
        | r1_orders_2(X86,X87,X88)
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X88,u1_struct_0(X86))
        | ~ m1_subset_1(X87,u1_struct_0(X86))
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X86) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d9_orders_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
    | ~ r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X1,X2),u1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X2,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( r2_hidden(k4_tarski(X2,X3),u1_orders_2(X1))
    | ~ r1_orders_2(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X3,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(X1))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( r2_hidden(X1,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
    | ~ r2_hidden(X2,u1_struct_0(esk1_0))
    | ~ r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    r1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    r2_hidden(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r2_hidden(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X91,X92] :
      ( ( v1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X91,X92))
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X91)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X92) )
      & ( l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X91,X92))
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X91)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X92) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k1_latsum_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( l1_orders_2(k1_latsum_1(X1,X2))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem    : SEU413+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 03:06:20 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.36  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.31/1.74  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.31/1.74  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.31/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.31/1.74  % Total time : 1.375s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------