↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SEU420+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:12:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.88s 4.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  21 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   65 (  29   ~;  22   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   2 sgn  48   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t13_relset_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X2)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( v1_relat_1(X3)
         => r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3),k3_pua2mss1(X1)),k3_xboole_0(k9_relat_1(X2,k3_pua2mss1(X1)),k9_relat_1(X3,k3_pua2mss1(X1)))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t13_relset_2) ).

fof(t48_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t48_xboole_1) ).

fof(t19_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
        & r1_tarski(X1,X3) )
     => r1_tarski(X1,k3_xboole_0(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t19_xboole_1) ).

fof(t157_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X2)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( v1_relat_1(X3)
         => ( r1_tarski(X2,X3)
           => r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X2,X1),k9_relat_1(X3,X1)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+10.ax',t157_relat_1) ).

fof(t3_relat_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X2)
     => ( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
       => v1_relat_1(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+10.ax',t3_relat_1) ).

fof(t36_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t36_xboole_1) ).

fof(t43_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( r1_tarski(X1,k2_xboole_0(X2,X3))
     => r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t43_xboole_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : k2_xboole_0(X1,X2) = k2_xboole_0(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+2.ax',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(t39_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : k2_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X2,X1)) = k2_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t39_xboole_1) ).

fof(t7_xboole_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : r1_tarski(X1,k2_xboole_0(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+4.ax',t7_xboole_1) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( v1_relat_1(X2)
       => ! [X3] :
            ( v1_relat_1(X3)
           => r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(X2,X3),k3_pua2mss1(X1)),k3_xboole_0(k9_relat_1(X2,k3_pua2mss1(X1)),k9_relat_1(X3,k3_pua2mss1(X1)))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t13_relset_2]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( v1_relat_1(esk2_0)
    & v1_relat_1(esk3_0)
    & ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0),k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k3_xboole_0(k9_relat_1(esk2_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k9_relat_1(esk3_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1570,X1571] : k4_xboole_0(X1570,k4_xboole_0(X1570,X1571)) = k3_xboole_0(X1570,X1571),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t48_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1530,X1531,X1532] :
      ( ~ r1_tarski(X1530,X1531)
      | ~ r1_tarski(X1530,X1532)
      | r1_tarski(X1530,k3_xboole_0(X1531,X1532)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t19_xboole_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k3_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0),k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k3_xboole_0(k9_relat_1(esk2_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k9_relat_1(esk3_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    k4_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X1,X2)) = k3_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,k3_xboole_0(X2,X3))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1698,X1699,X1700] :
      ( ~ v1_relat_1(X1699)
      | ~ v1_relat_1(X1700)
      | ~ r1_tarski(X1699,X1700)
      | r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X1699,X1698),k9_relat_1(X1700,X1698)) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t157_relat_1])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X1471,X1472] :
      ( ~ v1_relat_1(X1472)
      | ~ r1_tarski(X1471,X1472)
      | v1_relat_1(X1471) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t3_relat_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0)),k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k4_xboole_0(k9_relat_1(esk2_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k4_xboole_0(k9_relat_1(esk2_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k9_relat_1(esk3_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(X1,k4_xboole_0(X2,k4_xboole_0(X2,X3)))
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X1,X3),k9_relat_1(X2,X3))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0)),k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k9_relat_1(esk3_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0)),k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k9_relat_1(esk2_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X1,X2),k9_relat_1(X3,X2))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X3)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X2025,X2026] : r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X2025,X2026),X2025),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t36_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0)),k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)),k9_relat_1(esk2_0,k3_pua2mss1(esk1_0)))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X1935,X1936,X1937] :
      ( ~ r1_tarski(X1935,k2_xboole_0(X1936,X1937))
      | r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1935,X1936),X1937) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t43_xboole_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X1887,X1888] : k2_xboole_0(X1887,X1888) = k2_xboole_0(X1888,X1887),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X1925,X1926] : k2_xboole_0(X1925,k4_xboole_0(X1926,X1925)) = k2_xboole_0(X1925,X1926),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t39_xboole_1]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X1899,X1900] : r1_tarski(X1899,k2_xboole_0(X1899,X1900)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t7_xboole_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,k4_xboole_0(esk2_0,esk3_0)),esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_24]),c_0_28]),c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k4_xboole_0(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X1,k2_xboole_0(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    k2_xboole_0(X1,X2) = k2_xboole_0(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    k2_xboole_0(X1,k4_xboole_0(X2,X1)) = k2_xboole_0(X1,X2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    r1_tarski(X1,k2_xboole_0(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_36]),c_0_38])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.06  % Problem    : SEU420+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.07/0.25  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 03:06:31 EDT 2026
% 0.07/0.25  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.07/0.25  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 4.88/4.33  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 4.88/4.33  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 4.88/4.33  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.88/4.33  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.88/4.34  % Total time : 3.758s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------