%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SEU425+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:25:06 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 8.92s 2.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 119 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 23 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 143 ( 59 ~; 54 |; 17 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 59 ( 6 sgn 38 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t21_relset_2,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
=> ( m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3)))
& v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3)))
& v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t21_relset_2) ).
fof(d3_relset_2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( v1_relat_1(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( ( v1_funct_1(X3)
& v1_relat_1(X3) )
=> ( X3 = k5_relset_2(X1,X2)
<=> ( ! [X4] :
( r1_tarski(X4,X1)
=> k1_funct_1(X3,X4) = k9_relat_1(X2,X4) )
& k1_relat_1(X3) = k1_zfmisc_1(X1) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_relset_2) ).
fof(dt_k5_relset_2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( v1_relat_1(X2)
=> ( v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2))
& v1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relset_2) ).
fof(cc1_relset_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
=> v1_relat_1(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+16.ax',cc1_relset_1) ).
fof(t20_relset_2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
=> r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3)),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t20_relset_2) ).
fof(t10_relset_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( v1_relat_1(X2)
=> ( r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X2),X1)
=> m2_relset_1(X2,k1_relat_1(X2),X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+16.ax',t10_relset_1) ).
fof(t4_funct_2,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( v1_funct_1(X2)
& v1_relat_1(X2) )
=> ( r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X2),X1)
=> ( m2_relset_1(X2,k1_relat_1(X2),X1)
& v1_funct_2(X2,k1_relat_1(X2),X1)
& v1_funct_1(X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+20.ax',t4_funct_2) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
=> ( m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3)))
& v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3)))
& v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t21_relset_2]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X268,X269,X270,X271] :
( ( ~ v1_relat_1(X269)
| ~ v1_funct_1(X270)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X270)
| X270 = k5_relset_2(X268,X269)
| k1_relat_1(X270) != k1_zfmisc_1(X268)
| k1_funct_1(X270,esk30_3(X268,X269,X270)) != k9_relat_1(X269,esk30_3(X268,X269,X270)) )
& ( ~ v1_relat_1(X269)
| ~ v1_funct_1(X270)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X270)
| X270 = k5_relset_2(X268,X269)
| k1_relat_1(X270) != k1_zfmisc_1(X268)
| r1_tarski(esk30_3(X268,X269,X270),X268) )
& ( ~ v1_relat_1(X269)
| ~ v1_funct_1(X270)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X270)
| X270 != k5_relset_2(X268,X269)
| k1_funct_1(X270,X271) = k9_relat_1(X269,X271)
| ~ r1_tarski(X271,X268) )
& ( ~ v1_relat_1(X269)
| ~ v1_funct_1(X270)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X270)
| X270 != k5_relset_2(X268,X269)
| k1_relat_1(X270) = k1_zfmisc_1(X268) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_relset_2])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X266,X267] :
( ( ~ v1_relat_1(X267)
| v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X266,X267)) )
& ( ~ v1_relat_1(X267)
| v1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X266,X267)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relset_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X126,X127,X128] :
( v1_relat_1(X128)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X128,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X126,X127))) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc1_relset_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0)))
| ~ v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0)))
| ~ v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0)) )
& m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X277,X278,X279] :
( r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X277,X279)),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X279)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(X279,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X277,X278))) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relset_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ v1_relat_1(X3)
| ~ v1_funct_1(X1)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
| X1 != k5_relset_2(X2,X3)
| k1_relat_1(X1) = k1_zfmisc_1(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
| v1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
| v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
| v1_relat_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X198,X199] :
( m2_relset_1(X199,k1_relat_1(X199),X198)
| ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X199),X198)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X199) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t10_relset_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
| r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X2,X1)),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
| k1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2)) = k1_zfmisc_1(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
v1_relat_1(esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X1),X2)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
| m2_relset_1(X1,k1_relat_1(X1),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
k1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,esk3_0)) = k1_zfmisc_1(X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0)))
| ~ v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0)))
| ~ v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X1,esk3_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
( ~ v1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0))
| m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).
fof(c_0_28,plain,
! [X224,X225] :
( ( ~ v1_funct_1(X225)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X225)
| ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X225),X224)
| m2_relset_1(X225,k1_relat_1(X225),X224) )
& ( ~ v1_funct_1(X225)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X225)
| ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X225),X224)
| v1_funct_2(X225,k1_relat_1(X225),X224) )
& ( ~ v1_funct_1(X225)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X225)
| ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X225),X224)
| v1_funct_1(X225) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_funct_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0)))
| ~ v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_14]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ v1_funct_1(X1)
| ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
| ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X1),X2)
| v1_funct_2(X1,k1_relat_1(X1),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_23]),c_0_26])]),c_0_24]),c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_14]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SEU425+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.45 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 06:26:37 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.92/2.21 % Version: 3.5.1
% 8.92/2.21 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 8.92/2.21 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2p with 300s (1) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % new_bool_1 with pid 143943 completed with status 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 8.92/2.21 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 8.92/2.21 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 8.92/2.21 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 8.92/2.21 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 8.92/2.21 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting new_bool_1 with 91s (1) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 143950 completed with status 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.92/2.21 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 8.92/2.21 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 8.92/2.21 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 8.92/2.21 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 8.92/2.21 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting new_bool_1 with 91s (1) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 82s (1) cores
% 8.92/2.21 % Preprocessing time : 0.049 s
% 8.92/2.21 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.92/2.21
% 8.92/2.21 % Proof found!
% 8.92/2.21 % SZS status Theorem
% 8.92/2.21 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.92/2.21 % Parsed axioms : 4492
% 8.92/2.21 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3794
% 8.92/2.21 % Initial clauses : 1201
% 8.92/2.21 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 27
% 8.92/2.21 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1174
% 8.92/2.21 % Processed clauses : 6219
% 8.92/2.21 % ...of these trivial : 29
% 8.92/2.21 % ...subsumed : 3153
% 8.92/2.21 % ...remaining for further processing : 3037
% 8.92/2.21 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 187
% 8.92/2.21 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Backward-subsumed : 265
% 8.92/2.21 % Backward-rewritten : 47
% 8.92/2.21 % Generated clauses : 22741
% 8.92/2.21 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19629
% 8.92/2.21 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 56
% 8.92/2.21 % Paramodulations : 22553
% 8.92/2.21 % Factorizations : 1
% 8.92/2.21 % NegExts : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Equation resolutions : 194
% 8.92/2.21 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Total rewrite steps : 7570
% 8.92/2.21 % ...of those cached : 6420
% 8.92/2.21 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Propositional check models : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 8.92/2.21 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 8.92/2.21 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 8.92/2.21 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 8.92/2.21 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 8.92/2.21 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 8.92/2.21 % Current number of processed clauses : 1542
% 8.92/2.21 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 351
% 8.92/2.21 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 8.92/2.21 % Negative unit clauses : 294
% 8.92/2.21 % Non-unit-clauses : 893
% 8.92/2.21 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15487
% 8.92/2.21 % ...number of literals in the above : 39878
% 8.92/2.21 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Current number of archived clauses : 1375
% 8.92/2.21 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 473661
% 8.92/2.21 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 267466
% 8.92/2.21 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1638
% 8.92/2.21 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38631
% 8.92/2.21 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % BW rewrite match attempts : 343
% 8.92/2.21 % BW rewrite match successes : 210
% 8.92/2.21 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Condensation successes : 0
% 8.92/2.21 % Termbank termtop insertions : 381041
% 8.92/2.21 % Search garbage collected termcells : 48399
% 8.92/2.21
% 8.92/2.21 % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.92/2.21 % User time : 1.278 s
% 8.92/2.21 % System time : 0.066 s
% 8.92/2.21 % Total time : 1.344 s
% 8.92/2.21 % Maximum resident set size: 12740 pages
% 8.92/2.21
% 8.92/2.21 % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.92/2.21 % User time : 3.898 s
% 8.92/2.21 % System time : 0.179 s
% 8.92/2.21 % Total time : 4.077 s
% 8.92/2.21 % Maximum resident set size: 9984 pages
% 8.92/2.21 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------