↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU425+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:20:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.56s 76.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  119 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   23 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  148 (  61   ~;  57   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   5 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d3_relset_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X2)
     => ! [X3] :
          ( ( v1_relat_1(X3)
            & v1_funct_1(X3) )
         => ( X3 = k5_relset_2(X1,X2)
          <=> ( k1_relat_1(X3) = k1_zfmisc_1(X1)
              & ! [X4] :
                  ( r1_tarski(X4,X1)
                 => k1_funct_1(X3,X4) = k9_relat_1(X2,X4) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_relset_2) ).

fof(dt_k5_relset_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X2)
     => ( v1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2))
        & v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k5_relset_2) ).

fof(t21_relset_2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
     => ( v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3))
        & v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3)))
        & m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t21_relset_2) ).

fof(t4_funct_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( v1_relat_1(X2)
        & v1_funct_1(X2) )
     => ( r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X2),X1)
       => ( v1_funct_1(X2)
          & v1_funct_2(X2,k1_relat_1(X2),X1)
          & m2_relset_1(X2,k1_relat_1(X2),X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+20.ax',t4_funct_2) ).

fof(cc1_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
     => v1_relat_1(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+16.ax',cc1_relset_1) ).

fof(t20_relset_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
     => r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3)),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t20_relset_2) ).

fof(t10_relset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( v1_relat_1(X2)
     => ( r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X2),X1)
       => m2_relset_1(X2,k1_relat_1(X2),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+16.ax',t10_relset_1) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( k1_relat_1(X7) = k1_zfmisc_1(X5)
        | X7 != k5_relset_2(X5,X6)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X7)
        | ~ v1_funct_1(X7)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X6) )
      & ( ~ r1_tarski(X8,X5)
        | k1_funct_1(X7,X8) = k9_relat_1(X6,X8)
        | X7 != k5_relset_2(X5,X6)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X7)
        | ~ v1_funct_1(X7)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X6) )
      & ( r1_tarski(esk30_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | k1_relat_1(X7) != k1_zfmisc_1(X5)
        | X7 = k5_relset_2(X5,X6)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X7)
        | ~ v1_funct_1(X7)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X6) )
      & ( k1_funct_1(X7,esk30_3(X5,X6,X7)) != k9_relat_1(X6,esk30_3(X5,X6,X7))
        | k1_relat_1(X7) != k1_zfmisc_1(X5)
        | X7 = k5_relset_2(X5,X6)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X7)
        | ~ v1_funct_1(X7)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X6) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_relset_2])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( v1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X3,X4))
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X4) )
      & ( v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X3,X4))
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relset_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( m1_subset_1(X3,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X2)))
       => ( v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3))
          & v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3)))
          & m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X3),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X3))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t21_relset_2]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( v1_funct_1(X4)
        | ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X4),X3)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X4)
        | ~ v1_funct_1(X4) )
      & ( v1_funct_2(X4,k1_relat_1(X4),X3)
        | ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X4),X3)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X4)
        | ~ v1_funct_1(X4) )
      & ( m2_relset_1(X4,k1_relat_1(X4),X3)
        | ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X4),X3)
        | ~ v1_relat_1(X4)
        | ~ v1_funct_1(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t4_funct_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( k1_relat_1(X2) = k1_zfmisc_1(X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_funct_1(X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | X2 != k5_relset_2(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(X2,X1))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X4,X5)))
      | v1_relat_1(X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc1_relset_1])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0)))
    & ( ~ v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0))
      | ~ v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0)))
      | ~ m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0))) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ m1_subset_1(X6,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X4,X5)))
      | r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X4,X6)),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X6))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relset_2])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( v1_funct_2(X1,k1_relat_1(X1),X2)
    | ~ v1_funct_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( k1_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2)) = k1_zfmisc_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk3_0,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(esk1_0,esk2_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2)),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(X2)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ v1_relat_1(X4)
      | ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X4),X3)
      | m2_relset_1(X4,k1_relat_1(X4),X3) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t10_relset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0)))
    | ~ v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0)))
    | ~ v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( v1_funct_2(k5_relset_2(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2)),X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0)),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( m2_relset_1(X1,k1_relat_1(X1),X2)
    | ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(X1),X2)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0),k1_zfmisc_1(esk1_0),k1_zfmisc_1(k2_relat_1(esk3_0)))
    | ~ v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( m2_relset_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2),k1_zfmisc_1(X1),X3)
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X2)
    | ~ r1_tarski(k2_relat_1(k5_relset_2(X1,X2)),X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_18]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_funct_1(k5_relset_2(esk1_0,esk3_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_13]),c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SEU425+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 09:07:42 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.27/27.30  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.27/27.30  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.27/27.31  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.27/27.31  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.41/50.34  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.41/50.35  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.41/50.40  eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.41/50.40  
% 4.54/73.40  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.54/73.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.54/73.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.54/73.48  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.56/76.73  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 4.56/76.73  
% 4.56/76.73  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 4.56/76.73  # OLD status Res
% 4.56/76.73  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 4.56/76.73  # Preprocessing time       : 2.948 s
% 4.56/76.73  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 4.56/76.73  
% 4.56/76.73  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 4.56/76.73  # OLD status Res
% 4.56/76.73  # Preprocessing time       : 22.664 s
% 4.56/76.73  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_eb48853eb71ccd2a6fdade56c25b63f5692e1a0c for 23 seconds:
% 4.56/76.73  
% 4.56/76.73  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 4.56/76.73  # OLD status Res
% 4.56/76.73  # Preprocessing time       : 22.883 s
% 4.56/76.73  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_761a0d093d9701c0eed884aebb46468e8d439c31 for 23 seconds:
% 4.56/76.73  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.2,,,100,1.0)
% 4.56/76.73  # Preprocessing time       : 2.921 s
% 4.56/76.73  
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof found!
% 4.56/76.73  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.56/76.73  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object total steps             : 32
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object formula steps           : 15
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object generating inferences   : 8
% 4.56/76.73  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 13
% 4.56/76.73  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.56/76.73  # Parsed axioms                        : 71102
% 4.56/76.73  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 71001
% 4.56/76.73  # Initial clauses                      : 189
% 4.56/76.73  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 10
% 4.56/76.73  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 179
% 4.56/76.73  # Processed clauses                    : 1103
% 4.56/76.73  # ...of these trivial                  : 47
% 4.56/76.73  # ...subsumed                          : 228
% 4.56/76.73  # ...remaining for further processing  : 828
% 4.56/76.73  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 62
% 4.56/76.73  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.56/76.73  # Backward-subsumed                    : 44
% 4.56/76.73  # Backward-rewritten                   : 249
% 4.56/76.73  # Generated clauses                    : 12010
% 4.56/76.73  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 11295
% 4.56/76.73  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 309
% 4.56/76.73  # Paramodulations                      : 11777
% 4.56/76.73  # Factorizations                       : 92
% 4.56/76.73  # Equation resolutions                 : 92
% 4.56/76.73  # Current number of processed clauses  : 533
% 4.56/76.73  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 54
% 4.56/76.73  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.56/76.73  #    Negative unit clauses             : 17
% 4.56/76.73  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 462
% 4.56/76.73  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3890
% 4.56/76.73  # ...number of literals in the above   : 24423
% 4.56/76.73  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.56/76.73  # Current number of archived clauses   : 294
% 4.56/76.73  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 74209
% 4.56/76.73  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27731
% 4.56/76.73  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 544
% 4.56/76.73  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10443
% 4.56/76.73  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 4.56/76.73  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 74
% 4.56/76.73  # BW rewrite match successes           : 41
% 4.56/76.73  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.56/76.73  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.56/76.73  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2804117
% 4.56/76.73  
% 4.56/76.73  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.56/76.73  # User time                : 3.062 s
% 4.56/76.73  # System time              : 0.127 s
% 4.56/76.73  # Total time               : 3.189 s
% 4.56/76.73  # Maximum resident set size: 181416 pages
% 4.58/96.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.58/96.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.52  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.52  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.53  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.58/96.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.53  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.53  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.54  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.54  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.56  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 4.58/96.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.64  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.64  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.58/96.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.58/96.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.65  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.65  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.58/96.66  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.67  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.58/96.67  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.67  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.67  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.67  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.58/96.67  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.67  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 4.58/96.67  eprover: No such file or directory
% 4.58/96.68  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 4.58/96.68  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------